armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan

About the Author

Trizz
Officially #10 on the AGM Top Fans List....Xinoph, Crackjg I'm gunning for your spots bwah ha ha ha HA!

Follow Me: www.twitter.com/ItzTrizz617

Still cocky, still arrogant, still with a complete disregard for AP writing style...its none other than Trizz

More By Trizz

Red Sox Offseason: Trizz(oh yea, that guy) digs in
7 votes, 3 comments
Where will Vick play, if anywhere?
11 votes, 4 comments
5 More Reasons to Stay Tuned Into the NBA Playoffs
13 votes, 9 comments
View All

Other recent voters

If you like the article, vote for it.
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Trizz vs. Jackie Robinson Day: 2009

by Trizz
created April 15, 2009, last edited April 16, 2009
14
Vote

As some of you old heads may remember, I did this piece last year on the gimmickizing of Jackie Robinson day. So since the MLB again wants to continue with a redundant tradition why not continue my own redundant tradition of writing this article with a little added commentary....this is Trizz vs. JR Day 2k9, enjoy

By no means do I mean to disrespect or go against Jackie and everything he has done over his life but I feel that the MLB is gimmickizing the whole thing. Yes I made up a word, if Roger Clemens can do it why can't I. So April 15th is not only the day lazy ass tax filers are screwed but its also Jackie Robinson Day. A day symbolizing when Jackie broke through to the majors and paved the way for many African American players--yes even Barry Bonds and other races alike. Last year in honor of the 60th anniversary, Ken Griffey Jr. requested he wore the number 42 in honor of Jackie and what was then a humble act by a class act player became a gimmick as everybody, primarily minority players wanted to copy Griff and wear 42.

Griff what have you done...damn you and your class acticity(yes another made up word)
Griff what have you done...damn you and your class acticity(yes another made up word)
Torii said it best the MLB are killing the whole meaning behind JR day
Torii said it best the MLB are killing the whole meaning behind JR day

So now this year, why not do it again for not a 75th or 100th...but a 61st anniversary because 62 is such a huge milestone. Now its presumed all black players must honor the man by wearing 42, what started as just a noble act has become a fad and as a fan I hate to see that happen. What's more aggravating (besides the whole David Ortiz wearing the jersey a week late, rain delay or not I just thought it was pretty tacky) is the teams without black players attempt to fit in by making all players wear it. While I agree its better than signing a token black guy it seems forced. But the sad part is if they don't go on with the fad they look disrespectful like a guy who insists on keeping his hat on during the national anthem.

So then suddenly, out comes polls of black players in the league and for one day people wonder why blacks have turned away from the sport. Why people rather be like LeBron James instead of Ryan Howard. Why Jimmy Rollins is the only black player for Team USA at the WBC and Jason Kiddis the closest thing to having a white person on the Redeem Team. Then they look at minority managers and are graded on their unofficial Rooney Rules. This year black baseball players is up to 10% a 14 year high compared to the record low 7% in 2008(I guess David Price is 2% himself) and they recieved an A for minority hirings for now theres 5 black managers...Jackie would be proud, I guess.

Torii Hunter said it best, they are killing the meaning of it. Only people I want to see wear 42 tomorrow is Griff if he wants to, the Dodgers and Mariano Rivera(who should've took the high road and changed his number in 97 but hey). I don't want something as significant as #42 become as pointless as K/9 statistic or as annoying as the pink hats (both are other issues for other posts). Next thing you know they will be selling #42 jerseys in preparation for JR day, further gimmickizing this day.

There are other ways to honor Jackie, a pre game ceremony, show a quick segment during the 7th inning stretch, had Griff not asked to wear the number, the MLB wouldn't have done just that so why act differently. The only thing worse than ignorance is fakeness(another made up word someone call Webster I'm on a roll here.)

The Dodgers should be the only team to have EVERY player wear #42...
The Dodgers should be the only team to have EVERY player wear #42...
Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
233 days ago
Score 0+-
Eh, I hear what you're saying but... give credit to baseball for at least trying. Yes, MLB screws most things up but let them gloriously screw up what they got right before the rest of America.


Jackie truly deserves a fitting tribute. A big, gregarious and bumbling tribute is still better than nothing at all.

I'd much rather see EVERY player wear 42 than a select, designated few.

Everyone has an inkling of who Jackie Robinson was - maybe not as much about the man as they should, but how many people can even name the first black NFL, NBA or NHL players? Or the first Hispanic, Asian, etc. players in ANY league?
Permalink | Reply
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
233 days ago
Score 1+-
Willie O'Ree


willie_oree3.jpg
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
233 days ago
Score 0+-
I'd give you 5 points for doing it again a week or a month from now without looking it up. Face it. Less than 1% of the Sports-lovin' population would be able to name any of the list I just presented.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
233 days ago
Score 0+-
Well actually he played for the Bruins and I kind of like the Bruins, and I once saw him throw out the first pitch at Fenway, so um, GFY.
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
233 days ago
Score 0+-
No, Good For You!!! Here's your 5 points, Admiral Diversity! Don't shove them all the way up your ass at the same time! =)
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
233 days ago
Score 1+-
I don't know about Admiral Diversity, I'd have no clue who he was if he didn't play for the Bruins.


And you missed a golden opportunity to point out the fact that the Bruins were the first NHL team to have a black player, whereas the Red Sox were the last MLB team to do the same. Not only that, O'Ree was a Bruin before Pumpsie Green was a Red Sock.


Big miss, my friend, big miss.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
233 days ago
Score 0+-
That one I looked up.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
233 days ago
Score 0+-
I also know that Woody Strode was one of the two first black players in the "modern" NFL, but I only know that because he became an actor and was in Spartacus, Once Upon a Time in the West, and The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance. He was also a football teammate of Mister Jackie Robinson at UCLA.
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
233 days ago
Score 0+-
You "miss" 100% of the "shots" you couldn't give a crap about shoving in other people's faces... At least I do.

My point was that MOST people don't even know that Jackie WASN'T the first black baseball player - neither was Moses Fleetwood Walker! How many people know the NFL had black players as far back as 1920?

But a little ignorance never hurt anyone, right???

Branch Rickey simply wanted to win baseball games. But Jackie changed America's collective consciousness. He changed an entire society. No small task.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
233 days ago
Score 0+-
I agree with your point man, and wasn't trying to shove anything in your face. Just pointing out some interesting facts.
Permalink
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
232 days ago
Score 0+-
Didn't look this up: Masonori Murakawa is the first asian baseball player. Played for the Dodgers in the mid 60s. So they did something groundbreaking and cool twice.
Permalink
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
232 days ago
Score 1+-
Ha ha ha. You can tell I didn't look that up. Got the name and the team wrong. It's Masanori Murakami and it was the Giants. Hoo boy! I think I'll take the rest of the day off!
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
233 days ago
Score 2+-
It has become a gimmick, but what in Major League Baseball isn't a gimmick? At least this year there won't be any controversy over who wears #42 and who doesn't. I thought letting players choose to wear it if they wanted to was a fine idea. But perhaps just a short ceremony before the game, and maybe a patch on the shoulder would be sufficient.
Permalink | Reply
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
233 days ago
Score 3+-
Who WOULDN'T want to wear #42? Jackie wasn't just a HOF ball player. He was a HOF human being.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
233 days ago
Score 1+-
Evidently, a great many players didn't want to wear the number, because when they couldv'e, they didn't.


You don't have to wear someone's number to appreciate him. Some might want to NOT wear the number as their own way of paying homage. Isn't that why numbers get retired?
Permalink
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
233 days ago
Score 7+-
I don't like the fact that Bud Selig mandated every one in uniform to wear #42 today.

However, I would like to honestly believe that every one in uniform would have proudly worn #42 by voluntary choice anyway. If it were me, I would want to wear #42. But is should still be a personal decision.

What sounds nicer? Every player wearing #42 because they were told to do so versus every player electing to wear Jackie's number because each wanted to?

IMO (and yes it is just an opinion), Bud Selig has turned a very meaningful day into some shlock marketing fest that feels as cheap as one of his ill fitting suits.

And kudos to Derek Jeter (yeah that guy...) for being the ONLY major leaguer to donate to the Jackie Robinson Foundation. I believe the scoop is available at F*SPN.
Permalink | Reply
Pittsburgh GunnyMajor Leaguer
232 days ago
Score 1+-
Bud Selig has turned a very meaningful day into some shlock marketing fest that feels as cheap as one of his ill fitting suits.


I could not agree more. Bud Selig has ruined MLB and I really do not watch it anymore.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
233 days ago
Score 1+-
If Tim Wakefield had pitched a no-hitter today, wouldn't it be weird if Cooperstown took and displayed his #42 jersey from the day?
Permalink | Reply
TrizzAll-American
232 days ago
Score 0+-
Top 2 stories...im Mr. Front Page lol
This user is a fan of Mr. Front Page
Permalink | Reply
LASportsblogAAA-er
232 days ago
Score 2+-
Armchair GM: Where Cockiness Happens (j/k Trizzy)
Permalink
Mvicks21JV Squad
232 days ago
Score 2+-
I think Branch Rickey should get more credit. Why not have a Branch Rickey Day and every player wear a bow tie. I understand that Robinson should be honored( although MLB does go overboard with it), but there would no Jackie without Rickey. Think about it...what if he signed another black player first. We could be honoring Larry Doby or some other player every year.
Permalink | Reply
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
232 days ago
Score 0+-
Rickey definitely deserves more credit for everything he did for the game. As Manny said above, almost everyone knows who Robinson is. But Branch Rickey is hardly a household name.
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
232 days ago
Score 0+-
Branch Rickey wasn't a pioneer as much as a guy who knew talent and wanted to win at any cost. People forget (or don't know) that Rickey had an opportunity long before Jackie to "break the color barrier" and not only didn't but vehemently opposed it. There's lots of evidence that Rickey was as racist as anyone in the 40's was but set those feelings aside when it came to winning...
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
232 days ago
Score 0+-
Abraham Lincoln once gave a speech about the dangers of whites marrying blacks, but I still think he was a pretty good President.


Rickey was a man who wanted to win, but the other 15 owners weren't exactly anti-winning. At the very least, give credit to Rickey for having the balls to be the first owner of an integrated team.
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
232 days ago
Score 0+-
I'm not discrediting him, I'm clarifying the glossed-over pages of history. The St. Louis Browns - long before the petite Eddie Gaedel and one armed Pete Gray - were going to sign a crap load of black players during WWII - "if they can fight for the American Way, they can Play the American game" -but the idea was shot down by Rickey and others.

The move to include talented players of all colors was inevitable. And it wasn't like Rickey was the first to consider it. He was smart enough to know it would take the right guy to do it.

If it wasn't for Kennesaw Mountain Landis, there would have never been a need for Negro Leagues.
Permalink
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free
Categories: Trizz fans | Opinions | Opinions by User Trizz | April 15, 2009 | April 2009

Don't Miss

Phillies World Series 2009: A Year Later, and They Still Don't Want Us
Sorry, But I'm Not Sorry
2009 NHL Preview
In Which Ricketts Wins World Series
2009 Week 3: Let’s Talk About Your Favorite NFL Team

In the News

Jake Delhomme has been sidelined with a broken finger.

Play the Quiz Game

How Many Home Runs Short was Fred McGriff from joining the 500 Club

New Articles

The 1976 Cincinnati Reds: One of Baseball's Greatest Teams
Thai Circle Takraw
Boat racing (Kaeng Ruer)
Kraabi Krabong! thai sport
Week 13: Bobby Bowden's Last Play

Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Article:Trizz_vs._Jackie_Robinson_Day:_2009"

This page was last modified 21:16, 15 April 2009. Content is available under the GFDL.

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise