armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan

About the Author

LouGehrig
I have been a Yankees fan for many years. Thanks to what has occurred during the last few years, I am beginning to wonder.

More By LouGehrig

How Can Fred McGriff Not Be Elected to the Hall of Fame?
3 votes, 1 comment
Ken Caminiti: National League's 1996 MVP
2 votes, 0 comments
Triple Crown Winner Lou Gehrig: No MVP
3 votes, 1 comment
View All

Other recent voters

If you like the article, vote for it.
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

The 1986 Boston Red Sox Really Were Losers

by LouGehrig
created July 23, 2009, last edited July 25, 2009
9
Vote

by Harold Friend

Dwight Evans expressed it perfectly. "I don't like to lose. I'm not going to say it's fun to be in a World Series because the ultimate is to be world champions."

One of Sports' Most Agonizing Defeats

The 1986 Boston Red Sox were within one strike of winning the World Series on three consecutive batters, and each time, the result was a single. Boston lost the game, which forced a Game 7. In the sixth inning of the deciding game, the Red Sox held a 3-0 lead, only to lose, 8-5. It was one of the most agonizing defeats in the history of sports,

Getting to the World Series Is Not Good Enough

Dwight Evans told the truth. It is ridiculous to state the obvious, which is that a team must get to the World Series before it can win the World Series, and then consider getting the chance to become World Champions as a great accomplishment. Getting to the World Series is merely the next to last step. The World Series loser is no more successful than the team with the worst record in the league. The World Series wasn't fun for Dwight Evans because he lost. Only winners have fun.

Marty Barrett, MVP

Second baseman Marty Barrett, whose name appeared on the scoreboard as the Series MVP during the bottom of the ninth inning in Game 6, tried to rationalize what had occurred. "I really thought we were going to win. They showed us a lot with their clutch hitting and good pitching. Both games were close. We thought we had them on the ropes when it was 3-0, but I guess it was just their year."

It is an argument that has no answer. Was Marty Barrett right? Was it clutch hitting and good pitching that resulted in the Red Sox defeat, or was it an inability to perform under pressure by the Red Sox that produced the clutch hits and good pitching?

Bruce Hurst Tired

Bruce Hurst, who had won Games 1 and 5, started Game 7 on three days rest, which was not unusual for a top starting pitcher in 1986. Hurst retired 16 of the first 17 batters he faced, but he tired in the sixth inning and admitted that he was unaware of it.

"I didn't recognize it as quickly as I should have. The same thing happened to me in California. My arm got tired before I realized it, and I started to get the ball up."

Calvin Schiraldi Loses

Hurst allowed three runs, which tied the game, and Red Sox manager John McNamara, who didn't have the sense to replace first baseman Bill Buckner for defensive purposes late in Game 6. brought in Calvin Schiraldi. The Red Sox immediately fell behind when the first batter Schiraldi faced hit a home run. The game was over.

Schiraldi picked up where Marty Barrett left off. "They did a super job coming back. They shouldn't have won, but they did. They have my congratulations." Shiraldi forgot to mention that they didn't need his congratulations. They had his pitches to hit.

Questioning John McNamara

Calvin Schiraldi was the Red Sox closer. In 1986, the term had not fully caught on, and a closer was often referred to as a "short man." When asked why he brought in his short man or closer so early, John McNamara, who was as responsible for the Red Sox loss as any of his pitchers, explained.

"We've done that before. Schiraldi is our short man. He got us here. We thought that was the spot for him. We had Roger Clemens to pitch in the ninth." Of course, there was no need for Roger to pitch in the ninth because the game was over.

Billy Buckner Was Proud

With the passage of time, Billy Buckner's blame has been de-emphasized, especially because he had injured legs and should never have been playing late in the game, but Billy Buckner didn't view winning the way Billy Martin or Bob Gibson viewed it.

"I'm proud of the fact the team made it this far. They outplayed us just slightly. We hit the ball a little better than they did, but their balls seemed to fall in." Billy, being outplayed slightly is all it takes to lose the World Series.

Rich Gedman's Perspective

Finally, contrast what Barrett, Hurst, McNamara, and Buckner had to say with that of catcher Rich Gedman when he was asked about the season in which the Red Sox won the pennant. "I guess if that's one consolation, I should be happy. But I'm not."

Reference:

By MICHAEL MARTINEZ. (1986, October 28). Red Sox Stunned By Lost Chances. New York Times (1857-Current file),D33. Retrieved July 23, 2009, from ProQuest Historical Newspapers The New York Times (1851 - 2006). (Document ID: 283982802).


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
128 days ago
Score 0+-
It's easy to question all this now. If Schiraldi had recorded his batters (and he did induce a playable ground ball, didn't he?)...if Buckner had made the play...if McNamara had made the substitution. The Sox could very well have lost anyway, and then there would be all new people to blame.
Permalink | Reply
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
128 days ago
Score 4+-
People forget, or rather don't even remember, that when Buckner missed the ball, the game had been tied already. Had Buckner fielded the ball properly, it would have merely extended the game.


Schiraldi had a very good season in '86, and was good in the ALCS (which was another choke job by the Angels). So either he choked in the clutch, or simply remembered who he was. The rest of his career is loaded with mediocrity.


If you look at all of those "Curse" moments in Red Sox history, one thing is common among all of them: a mediocre pitcher is on the mound. Schiraldi, Bob Stanley, Mike Torrez, Tim Wakefield, and so on.
Permalink | Reply
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
127 days ago
Score 0+-
You're right about BillyBuck. Bill Buckner deserved NONE of what he got.

Not only was it tied already but IT WAS GAME 6! If they took care of business early or in Game 7 it never would be remembered. Speaking of "remembered" --u-h-- How old were you in 1986? Two? Three years old? Not born yet?


Same thing for Leon Durham... Steve Bartman, Mitch Williams, Charlie Liedbrant, Don Denkinger, Merkel's boner, Paul Revere's ride, Jeffrey Maier, The Battle of Valley Forge, Derek Jeter's entire career: what's "remembered" isn't always what really happened.

Good stuff, but otherwise like a typical Red Sox fan: a mediocre pitcher is on the mound" - yeah, Tim Wakefield is the franchise's ALL-TIME winningest pitcher.
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #1
127 days ago
Score 0+-
Bob Stanley Cost the red sox game 6 and the series not buckner. Stanley came in with a one run lead he then proceeded to throw a wild pitch tying the game, Then Mookie Wilson hit that fateful ground ball that in hindsight I don't think either bob stanley who was about as fast as those motorized carts that old people use at the grocery store or bill bad knees buckner beats mookie wilson running as hard as he can to the bag. But who cares it made 2004 that much more fun. Although haring about this fairy tale "curse" throughout the 90's and early this decade was getting really really annoying.
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free
Categories: Opinions | Opinions by User LouGehrig | July 23, 2009 | July 2009 | MLB Opinions | Boston Red Sox Opinions | 1986 World Series Opinions | World Series Opinions | Dwight Evans Opinions | Marty Barrett Opinions | Billy Buckner Opinions

Don't Miss

Phillies World Series 2009: A Year Later, and They Still Don't Want Us
Sorry, But I'm Not Sorry
2009 NHL Preview
In Which Ricketts Wins World Series
2009 Week 3: Let’s Talk About Your Favorite NFL Team

In the News

Hey ArmchairGM users! Want to help the admins update this news section? Click here to help us out.

Comments of the Day

0 LaDanian Tomlinson (check the QB rating)
0 Only because the voters are facking stupid. "Numbers" are...

Take a Poll

Did the world series go on in 1941 or was it canceled because of the war?
No Yes

New Articles

How Can Fred McGriff Not Be Elected to the Hall of Fame?
Best African-American Quarterback Ever?
Ken Caminiti: National League's 1996 MVP
Winter Olympics 2010
Highlights from Dubai 7's

Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Article:The_1986_Boston_Red_Sox_Really_Were_Losers"

This page was last modified 15:49, 23 July 2009. Content is available under the GFDL.

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise