armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan

About the Author

InterMat
Hardly your run of the mill writer/journalist/ broadcaster whatever. I'm passionate about writing, traveling and sports in general. Wrestling's my thing, but I'll step outside here and there. I'm 29, love disc golf, darts, roller derby, announcing and broadcasting. I do a mean "Afroman" on karaoke as well.

More By InterMat

The Top 100 Recruits: A brief view of the Top Five
5 votes, 0 comments
The Jake Deitchler Blog: The Start of the Olympic Journey
2 votes, 0 comments
Final six Olympians crowned on Sunday at Trials
4 votes, 2 comments
View All

Other recent voters

If you like the article, vote for it.
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Still need some forward thinking regarding Title IX

by InterMat
created February 29, 2008, last edited February 10, 2009
7
Vote

Posted originally at my other blog: Common Sense Need Not Apply  

I recently stumbled across a study by the College Sports Council regarding the Title IX compliance regarding Prong One (Proportionality) at Historically Black Colleges and Universities.

USA Today broached the issue, as did the Chronicle of Higher Education, but there was one quote from Jocelyn Samuels, Vice President at the National Women's Law Center, that struck me as one of those "are you kidding?" type of things.

"The fact that so many in this universe of colleges are not meeting the proportionality standard is a red flag not of potential problems for men," says Jocelyn Samuels, a vice president of the National Women's Law Center, "but of the fact that women continue to be denied the benefits of athletic participation in the numbers you would expect."

With all due respect, Samuels comment doesn't speak with a common sense view. So a school with 65 percent female enrollment should have 65 percent of the athletic opportunities, right? That, in a nutshell, is what proportionality basically has been boiled down to in its truest and unjust form. The fact there are more women attending college makes things more difficult for athletic departments, especially at HBCUs, where enrollment for men continues to dwindle.

HBCUs athletic traditions center around football, halftime band displays and the core mission surrounding those programs. Adding sports to inflate numbers have occurred and sports have been placed where there was no local interest, in terms of high school teams participating, just to push up numbers.

How many high school bowling teams are in Virginia? Well, there's more women's college bowling teams in Virginia than there are high school bowling teams. Hampton University and Norfolk State have Division I women's bowling teams in a state that doesn't sponsor the sport on the high school level.

  You're telling me that's interest?

Women have more sports to choose from, have more scholarships in nearly every sport where there is a male equivalent (except lacrosse) and have larger rosters than men's programs. Football, obviously being the only men's only sport with gigantic roster, throws things at HBCU's out of proportion, but there's a deeper problem.

Opportunities are dwindling for men, and we're seeing men's enrollments dropping. If you're over 6-feet-tall and over 200 pounds, you have opportunities, but the rest of the dynamic of college sports is being trimmed, and you're seeing this predominantly in Olympic Sports.

Another thing to consider: Women competing on men's wrestling rosters in college are counted as men -- like Olympic silver medalist Patricia Miranda was at Stanford.

Another telling correlation can be recognized in the drop of male teachers in our schools at the elementary, middle/jr. high, and high school levels, as evidenced here from MSN.

So we're losing men's programs, college male enrollement is down, and now our next generation of mentors and coaches aren't teaching at the rates they used to.

Title IX compliance, in the eyes of some people, continues to be more about reparations from past discrimination than it is about fairness. People want to play. Students shouldn't be treated as numbers, they should be treated like human beings.

Some groups simply don't care.


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
620 days ago
Score 1+-
The stupidest thing about Title IX in my opinion - Women's teams can't use men to practice against.

Regardless of scholarships, opportunity to play, etc. - I forget what school it was but a NCAA women's basketball team got punished for using males to practice against because the rule says it limited opportunities for women.

These dudes were picked by the coach because they taller and more athletic. Obviously they weren't playing, but practicing against women which you'd think would be MORE beneficial for the women. But the rule says it's not fair.

Blanket rules serve too many wrong agendas.

Nothing is good for everything.
Permalink | Reply
Steel TownDraft Pick
620 days ago
Score 1+-
Awsome article, I wish I could vote for it 30 times.
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free
Categories: Opinions | Opinions by User InterMat | February 29, 2008 | February 2008 | Title IX Opinions | HBCU Opinions

Don't Miss

Phillies World Series 2009: A Year Later, and They Still Don't Want Us
Sorry, But I'm Not Sorry
2009 NHL Preview
In Which Ricketts Wins World Series
2009 Week 3: Let’s Talk About Your Favorite NFL Team

In the News

Stanford defeated No. 8 Oregon in an upset, 51-42. Running back Toby Gerhart rushed for a school-record 223 yards and three touchdowns, helping Stanford stop Oregon's seven-game win streak.

Comments of the Day

1 Pssst! Phillies "fans"... you lost. Get over it already. ...
0 why join in sports
0 i personally think this list has no validity. it does...

Take a Poll

As of 2009, who is the best third baseman in the game?
Alex Rodriguez Evan Longoria David Wright Ryan Zimmerman Other

New Articles

Bad Flashbacks: An Analysis of USC v ASU
What If Brad Lidge Had Started Game One?
Week 9 Postgame: Trick or Treat?
Dear FIFA, UEFA, & Football Fans... It is time.
Make it Number 27

Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Article:Still_need_some_forward_thinking_regarding_Title_IX"

This page was last modified 17:58, 29 February 2008. Content is available under the GFDL.

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise