armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan

About the Author

Ron Sen, MD
Busy, busy, busy, with family, work, and hobbies.

More By Ron Sen, MD

Reality TV: The NFL Draft
7 votes, 0 comments
Mind Numbing Baseball or Instant Classic?
8 votes, 10 comments
Low Blow for Powe
4 votes, 0 comments
View All

Other recent voters

If you like the article, vote for it.
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Sox and Steroids

by Ron Sen, MD
created August 05, 2009, last edited August 06, 2009
9
Vote

Did anyone doubt that Red Sox players would eventually appear on "The List"? We can diminish the 'cheating' aspect because we root for laundry, but our bitterness over a pair of Jason Giambi homers in the ALCS softens when we realize that Red Sox hitters had juiced, too.

We may never know who 'just did it' and who didn't, although we all harbored suspicions over bulked up cover boys and supercharged homer production and slugging percentage from guys who hadn't produced oversized numbers.

MLB and its players union never really wanted the genie let out of the bottle. Owners raked in the dough from fannies in the seats, players' salaries skyrocketed, and the game's popularity soared. When does exposing the man behind the curtain ever seem the thing to do?

High profile hearings embarrassing stars like Rafael Palmeiro and Mark McGwire put the Commissioner and his minions on notice that public airing of needle-stained laundry didn't play nearly as well as a bloody sock.

Sox fans snickered at A-Rod's outing and the recent double dip of Manny Ramirez and David Ortiz simply serves us the crow that we deserve. The inclusion of an Eric Gagne in the Mitchell Report didn't provide either red meat or a wake up call. But our fascination with Big Papi gets undermined by the realization that at least some of his production was tainted.

Of all baseball's cheaters, who has come off 'cleanest' and who's fared worst? The latter provides no challenge with Barry Bonds leading the parade, and Roger Clemens, never proven beyond all doubt, came a close second with his choir boy image dispelled. Andy Pettitte took the smallest hit, containing the damage with an apology and a "taking one for the team explanation."

So what should David Ortiz say and what will he say? Obviously, we don't know the facts, and some players probably have inadvertently taken banned substances. The old saying about it's easiest to remember the truth comes to mind. But even within the truth, Ortiz might be able to contain the damages. Or not. But whatever he says, I hope he touches on the three R's - respect for the game, remorse for his actions, and regret that they might adversely influence behavior of younger athletes.

Baseball could have handled this with blanket amnesty for players who simply admitted their mistake and acknowledged a subsequent "zero tolerance" policy. But both owners and players (and their attorneys) had too much hubris and too much money, willingly defrauding the public who simply believed the lie.


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
116 days ago
Score 0+-
I think the public may have believed the lie for a while, but that changed. I believe the public is far less willing to accept any pro athlete at face value. At least the owners can cop to a "don't ask, don't tell" rap and attempt to absolve themselves of any culpability. But they are enablers just as we fans are. As long as we care, we'll believe in the players. And what choice do we have? I like watching baseball and following the Phillies (even after the past couple of games).
Permalink | Reply
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
115 days ago
Score 1+-
Didn't Manny say, after testing positive this year, that he only took some prescription drug because his physician didn't know it was banned? So why did he test positive in '03, as well? And why is it nobody seems to be asking this question?
Permalink | Reply
CheezerAll-Star
114 days ago
Score 1+-
I think everyone pretty much assumes he's lying and has been juicing at least 2003-2009. I know I am.
Permalink
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free
Categories: Opinions | Opinions by User Ron Sen, MD | August 5, 2009 | August 2009

Don't Miss

Phillies World Series 2009: A Year Later, and They Still Don't Want Us
Sorry, But I'm Not Sorry
2009 NHL Preview
In Which Ricketts Wins World Series
2009 Week 3: Let’s Talk About Your Favorite NFL Team

In the News

Hey ArmchairGM users! Want to help the admins update this news section? Click here to help us out.

Comments of the Day

0 LaDanian Tomlinson (check the QB rating)
0 Only because the voters are facking stupid. "Numbers" are...

Play the Quiz Game

Which of colelge football teams did George Steinbrenner not serve as an assitant coach for?

New Articles

How Can Fred McGriff Not Be Elected to the Hall of Fame?
Best African-American Quarterback Ever?
Ken Caminiti: National League's 1996 MVP
Winter Olympics 2010
Highlights from Dubai 7's

Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Article:Sox_and_Steroids"

This page was last modified 03:03, 5 August 2009. Content is available under the GFDL.

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise