armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan

About the Author

Jakeblloyd

More By Jakeblloyd

Lasting memories from the 2008 sports year
3 votes, 1 comment
The last thing these Detroit Lions need is hope
12 votes, 7 comments
If only I could be Stephon Marbury
12 votes, 4 comments
View All

Other recent voters

If you like the article, vote for it.
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Parity a good thing for men's tennis

by Jakeblloyd
created January 27, 2008, last edited February 10, 2009
8
Vote

At 3:03 a.m., I passed out on the couch.

I couldn't make it to the 3:30 starting time. But that doesn't mean I wasn't excited about this men's Australian Open final. In fact, I was more pumped for the Novak Djokovic - Jo-Wilfried Tsonga matchup than for any grand slam final in recent memory.

For the first time in three years, one man was absent from the final: Roger Federer. And for the first time in three years, I didn't see a clear favorite. Djokovic was the seeded player — No. 3 — who knocked off Federer in straight sets in the semifinals. But Tsonga played the most dominant match of the tournament in dispatching of No. 2 Rafael Nadal in straight sets.

Plus, Tsonga has looks similar to a certain Muhammad Ali, a fact not lost upon his boisterous French fans, who like to shout out, "Go Ali!"

So I was not surprised when I suddenly awoke from my deep sleep at 6:14. Some old Super Bowl — I think SB XXIII featuring the 49ers and Bengals — was playing on the TV, but I was just alert enough to locate the remote, which was under the couch, and flip over to ESPN2.

... And it didn't take me long to wake up.

Djokovic and Tsonga were immersed in an emotion-filled, energized final. The crowd, quite decorous for most of the tournament's two weeks, was voluble, yelling out encouragement to their favorite, Tsonga, after each point. Djokovic's fans responded with chants of "Nole! Nole! Nole!" — the 20-year-old Serbian's nickname.

It was the fourth set, Tsonga having taken the first set before Djokovic won the second and third sets. And it would go down to the wire.

Not once during the drama-filled set did I find myself yearning for Federer or Nadal, who have dominated the grand slams the past few years. Watching Tsonga and Djokovic fight for their first grand slam title was good television, especially at 6:15 on a Sunday morning.

(No, I don't watch cartoons.)

I even found myself gaining a rooting interest in Tsonga only because I wanted to see more tennis. When Djokovic won a point on Tsonga's serve in the tiebreak, I pounded the pillow I was holding in frustration. When Djokovic took a commanding 6-2 lead, I gingerly started planning my sleeping plans.

Yes, I was disappointed that I didn't get a fifth set, that I didn't get to stay awake for another hour, but that didn't take away from how great the tennis was during the 45 minutes I was able to stay out of sleep mode.

And this could only be the beginning.

As good as Roger Federer is, the competition has caught up to him. At 20, Djokovic has loads of potential. As annoying as his several-bounce routine prior to big service points is, his talent and cool-customer demeanor are very similar to traits of the Great Federer.

Tsonga, 22, has just as bright of a future. Anyone who saw his match against Nadal knows what he's capable of.

Will either player be as consistently dominant as Federer?

C'mon, mate? Arya crazy?

But no longer can we pencil Federer in for three grand slam championships a year and Nadal for the French Open title.

As in other sports, parity is a good thing for men's tennis.

Federer is still the undisputed world's No. 1, but he's got some company at the top.


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
BigPPupMajor Leaguer
674 days ago
Score 0+-
Feder and Nadal lost but I wouldnt say that parity has emerged in mens tennis just yet.
Permalink | Reply
Bobbyjim45Draft Pick
673 days ago
Score 0+-
Even a blind squirrel finds a nut once in a while...
Permalink
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free
Categories: Opinions | Opinions by User Jakeblloyd | January 27, 2008 | January 2008 | Tennis Opinions

Don't Miss

Phillies World Series 2009: A Year Later, and They Still Don't Want Us
Sorry, But I'm Not Sorry
2009 NHL Preview
In Which Ricketts Wins World Series
2009 Week 3: Let’s Talk About Your Favorite NFL Team

In the News

Rumor: New Jersey Nets general manager Kiki Vandeweghe will coach the team for the rest of the season.

Comments of the Day

1 Thanks. I think he will make it, but not on the first try.
0 The question is... Why does Smith struggle when he is under cen...
0 My 9 year old daughter has a loose kneecap, it has sl...
0 hes not a quarterback so its warren moon randall cunningham o...
0 Hmmm... Who won a Super Bowl? Doug Williams.

Take a Poll

As of 2009, who is the best third baseman in the game?
Alex Rodriguez Evan Longoria David Wright Ryan Zimmerman Other

New Articles

Waivers, Trading Deadline, and the Integrity of the Game
From Class Act to No Class.
A-Rod Helps the New York Yankees Win the World Series
Alex Smith Carries Niners Past Jaguars
The Los Angeles Dodgers Dominated the Yankees in the 1963 World Series

Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Article:Parity_a_good_thing_for_men%27s_tennis"

This page was last modified 18:05, 27 January 2008. Content is available under the GFDL.

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise