armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan

About the Author

Warden

More By Warden

Coming To Life
7 votes, 30 comments
Memory's Wrecking Ball
4 votes, 1 comment
Week Two NFL Caravan
13 votes, 25 comments
View All

Other recent voters

If you like the article, vote for it.
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

One Eyed King

by Warden
created September 17, 2008, last edited September 30, 2008
6
Vote

Now, you might think someone would have better things to do with their time than defend the Dallas Cowboys' honor in what passes for the sporting press these days. Well, unfortunately, in my case you'd be dead wrong. Turning to Peter King's Tuesday Morning Quarterback column on SI.com, I should have known better than to expect a storyline involving something along the lines of the Cowboys winning the last MNF game played at Texas Stadium, the highest scoring game in the 98-game rivalry. Nah, that's too pedestrian an approach for the clever King; instead, he goes all Bizarro World and raves about how great the gritty Eagles looked while losing! It's a totally slanted article, but by now no one should be surprised by Peter King making excuses for Andy Reid. King starts with a pro-Philly agenda early and never lets up. Johnny Donovan, the excerpts please:

> "The Eagles were tremendous last night. All that stood between them and beating the best team in football on the road was a botched Donovan McNabb-to-Brian Westbrook handoff with nine minutes left at the Dallas 33, trying to expand on a three-point lead. That's a once- or twice-a-year event, that kind of stupid play, and it shouldn't take away from what the Eagles showed the country in a scintillating football game."

Yes, there was that fumbled exchange on the Eagles' third-to-last drive of the game. But Philly got the ball back 2 more times! The drive after the fumble the Eagles were forced to punt, and the next time they had the ball, McNabb was sacked twice as the Eagles ran out of downs. So the Eagles had TWO MORE CHANCES to scintillate America some more by driving for a winning score. I guess they had demonstrated their "tremendousness" enough already by that point; by then there was no reason to show everything in the arsenal to the largest cable TV audience since they began tracking such things.

An impartial writer might balance out his piece by including some of the botched plays by the Cowboys in the first half that all but gift-wrapped not one but two Eagles touchdowns. I don't know how "once or twice in a lifetime" those plays were, but they were major factors in the Eagles comeback nonetheless. An ill-advised pass by Romo led to an Asante Samuel INT, his return gave Philly the ball at the Cowboys 33 yard line; the next play was a make-believe pass interference call on CB Anthony Henry that set Philly up at the Dallas 1. Brian Westbrook scored on the next play. Then came the drop by Romo in his own end zone. That act of self-destruction was set up by another: a badly muffed kickoff return by Isaiah Stanback forced Dallas to start the drive on their own 5 yard line, a false start moved it back inside the 3, and then came Romo's fumble. That sequence gave Philly 14 points in 14 seconds -- suddenly turning a 14-6 deficit into a 21-14 lead -- which some might even call a once-in-a-generation happenstance.

Next, the deluded King lists three reasons why the Philadelphia Eagles just might prevail over the Cowboys and Giants after all in the tough NFC East division: 1, Philly can really play the run; 2, Donovan McNabb is back and better than ever; and 3, Brian Westbrook is Brian Westbrook. That's what I mean by having an agenda. Sure, all these things are true, and Philly will probably be in the division race all year, but was this the time and place to pontificate to his readers about it? The Cowboys won 41-37 in thrilling fashion, and yet in King's column we find no mention of the electrifying rookie Felix Jones, who set a Dallas franchise record for kickoff return yardage. No mention of Romo's performance, who by the way managed to outplay McNabb when it counted most -- 21-30 for 312, 3 TDs (123 QB rating) versus 25-37 and 281 and 1 TD (99 QB rating).

In the first half Eagles sold out to stop the run, pinching their LBs tight between the defensive ends. In the second half Marion Barber churned out enough first downs to seal the game, scored on a rushing TD, and also caught a 17-yard TD pass, but King never cares about numbers or facts when they don't work to prove a point he's intent on making:

> "I don't care about Westbrook's stats; don't even tell me what they were. The great thing about this guy is he can get splattered like a squirrel in the road by a Hummer on one play, then he's back to make a play the next. What must he feel like the day after a game? Remember Larry Brown, the old Redskins running back? You couldn't believe the abuse Brown took on Sundays, and then he'd be back, fresh, the next week, running over somebody."

Just a pointless anecdote by Uncle Peter. Westbrook for the record was 18-58 rushing in the game, Barber 18-63. And this is the time he picks to make his stretch of a case that with "LaDainian Tomlinson getting nicked, Westbrook, right now, is the best all-around back in football for my money. He's what Tiki Barber was for the Giants for the last three years of his career -- an indefatigable runner and receiver you could build an offense around." Westbrook is a dynamic player, but it's not like he was close to being the best player on the field Monday Night. So put away your hero worship, King, and instead maybe some insight into the game that was just played, if you even watched it. Predictably, Clueless Pete sets up the choice Andy Reid quote:

> "As Reid said after the game, the Eagles just looked tougher last night. "We're a tough-minded football team, and that's important, Reid said. "I'm proud of the guys, man.

That's not bias, though, to single out the Eagles supposed toughness in a game where TE Jason Witten separates a shoulder but misses just one series, when S Roy Williams fractures a forearm on a special tackle teams and is lost for a month. I'm sure Wade Phillips was just disgusted with his own team's effort on Monday night. King concludes with his pseudo justification for the Eagles losing and Dallas winning. No mention that the Cowboys defense clamped down, holding the Eagles to just 7 points after halftime. Or how, say, Marion Barber playing with bruised ribs gutted out some tough yardage down the stretch. No, it's a case of the Eagles sort of overlooking a specific part of the game that you just know Reid & Co. will fix by the time they meet Dallas again.

> "The Eagles lost this game because they couldn't get pressure on Tony Romo. Period. They've got the terminally underrated Trent Cole and Chris Clemons to fix that, and it must be better. But I wouldn't worry. Cole's not going to be as invisible as he was last night."

I searched that paragraph in vain for any praise or credit given to the Dallas O-Line -- superbly coached by Hudson Houck -- for keeping thosee mighty Eagles away from Romo and for giving up no sacks in 31 pass attempts.  But I guess Flozell Adams, Leonard Davis and Marc Columbo had nothing to do with Cole and Clemons looking invisible; they must have stopped themselves all night. Rest assured, if Dallas loses this week at Green Bay, you won't see Peter King writing about how noble they were in defeat.


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
Steel TownDraft Pick
432 days ago
Score 2+-
Well, this is the same Peter King that thinks Romo is better than Roethlisberger. Of course, the stats and performance on the field say otherwise. There is no stopping the hype machine so Peter King just hangs on for the ride. Why not talk about the Eagles? The Cryboys are old news.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #1
431 days ago
Score 0+-
How do the stats prove Romo is not better than Ben? Enlighten us. Cryboys are old news? Brilliant!
Permalink | Reply
Steel TownDraft Pick
431 days ago
Score 2+-
Cryboys as old news was sarcasm. They are one of the top teams so far this year.


No for your facking enlightenment. Why don't you go ahead and compare the QB ratings of the two. Then go ahead and count playoff victories. And then, just for good measure count the superbowl rings.
Permalink
Steel TownDraft Pick
431 days ago
Score 1+-
QB rating: Big Ben (136.3), Romo (113.1)

TDs: Big Ben (3), Romo (4) Interceptions: Big Ben (0), Romo (2) Playoff wins: Romo (0) NUFF SAID

Superbowl Wins: Big Ben (1), Romo (Obviously a big 0)
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
431 days ago
Score 2+-
Yawn
Permalink | Reply
APOSTROPHESoccer Kid
431 days ago
Score 3+-
Yawn

Yawn

Yawn

It must be contagious
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #1
431 days ago
Score 0+-
Hey Apostrophe, with your flimsy body of work, you have the nerve to criticize someone else. You're just another geek on his mommy's computer to me. You fit right in with the other dime a dozen, know-it-all 19-year-olds living in their parents' basement populating this site.
Permalink | Reply
JuTMSY4Legend
431 days ago
Score 3+-
Warden, your IP is showing... 72.229.239.160
Permalink
Steel TownDraft Pick
431 days ago
Score 2+-
You speak of what you don't know warden.
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #1
431 days ago
Score 0+-
Get a life, Just-Lame, or maybe a job. You're like a cockroach under my shoe. Yes, this is Warden the Great. You all should be taking notes when reading my stuff. You just might learn something. I'm used to gnats like you attacking me. It's called envy.
Permalink | Reply
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
431 days ago
Score 1+-
Yeah, blame it on "jealousy"!!! HA HA!!
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
431 days ago
Score 3+-
why so vicious? And actually, I'm one of the rare Financial services workers who...has a job...but thanks
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
431 days ago
Score 1+-
What do you expect from a guy who writes a column based on another sportswriter then says we should be taking notes? Peter King has his gnats too...

Because WE are jealous?

Or to reiterate... YAWN.
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #1
431 days ago
Score -3+-
Here's the solution for Stiles, Just-Lame, Amphibidick: Don't read my stuff when you see my byline, don't comment either. Go on with your shallow lives, I'm begging you all. I'll get over it that you're not fans, trust me!
Permalink | Reply
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
431 days ago
Score 2+-
Well that just guaranteed you got me as your new personal headache. A writer that tells me NOT to read his articles is just ASKING for himself to get a full time new subscriber.

Look, douche, if you want to criticize people for what they do, you better DAMN WELL be prepared to get a heavy dosage of your own.

Good luck being "Warden the Great", because I'm the baddest and most annoying gnat you ever tried to take a swat at.

You should take a lesson in learning how to "speak to your audience" - because we're the majority of people who even acknowledge your word regurgitations...
Permalink
Steel TownDraft Pick
431 days ago
Score 2+-
Whats wrong, did the pesky stats get in the way of your Romo fantasy.
Permalink | Reply
WardenVarsity
431 days ago
Score 0+-
Nothing's wrong, Steel Town. I'm not in front of a computer 24 hours a day. Okay, here's the numbers. Romo threw for 4211 yards, with 36 TDs & 19 INTs, for a 97.4 QB Rating; Ben threw for 3154 yards with 32 TDs and 11 TDs. So already it's more yardage, more TDs in Romo's favor. Romo averaged 8.1 yards an attempt, Ben 7.8. I mean, they're real close in my opinion. Yeah, you're right, Steel Town, those stats prove I have no case favoring Romo. My bad. All he has is a ring over Romo. That's big, of course, it's what all the league shoots for. Hopefully Romo will lead the Cowboys to one someday. I would take a playoff win first and then go from there!

You remember that Super Bowl, the one where the refs bailed out your team as usual with a good whistle the whole game. Is that pesky, my pointing an obvious fact out, that the Seahawks probably got jobbed out of a close game?

Now, Ben played great that year leading them to the 15-1, not so much in the Super Bowl itself. But it was a running team primarily then and still is. But Ben is a winning player that most teams would kill for. Believe me, you can't go wrong with either QB.
Permalink | Reply
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
431 days ago
Score 1+-
great point "Bore-den the Great"!
Permalink
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
431 days ago
Score 1+-
The refs bailed the Steelers out? Did the refs give up a 75-yard TD? Did the refs fall for a flea-flicker? Did the refs botch the clock management? Anyone who wants to take it away from the Steelers...the Seahawks never should have been there in the first place.
Permalink
WardenVarsity
431 days ago
Score 0+-
Sorry, left out Ben's QB rating in '07: better than Romo's at 104+. He made fewer mistakes than Romo in '07, Romo made a ton more big plays. Depends on how wide open the offense is, does it not?
Permalink | Reply
Steel TownDraft Pick
431 days ago
Score 0+-
Check this out:


http://sport...lid=tab2pos1

Romo didn't even come in second. You can talk about all the big plays you want. But in the end it's about winning football games. There are times where Ben drags the entire offense kicking and screaming into victory.
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
431 days ago
Score 0+-
Yep, it does not!
Permalink | Reply
WardenVarsity
431 days ago
Score 0+-
SJ, you said: "the Seahawks never should have been there in the first place." How is this different than saying "Anyone who want to take it away from the Steelers..." Why did Seattle not deserve to be in the SB? And I'm not the only one, far from it, who came away from watching that Bowl who thought there were 4 or 5 hideous calls. I stand by my original statement. Bring it on.
Permalink | Reply
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
431 days ago
Score 0+-
"Bring it on!" Bore-dem the Great has spoken! He wants to stand by his original statement!!!
Permalink
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
431 days ago
Score 1+-
Sorry Seattle fans....but they weren't the NFC's best team. That's why they didn't deserve to be there. And I will lean on an old AGM credo: "YOU LOST - DON'T BLAME THE REFS" Go ahead and stand by your original statement. Ben is better than Romo. The Steelers would have won the Super Bowl irrespective of whatever bad calls Holmgren wants to whine about. Pittsburgh won the game. That pretty much ends the argument.
Permalink
Steel TownDraft Pick
430 days ago
Score 2+-
While we are at it. Where was Romo the great his first two years. Oh, that's right, he was sitting behind Bledsoe and Henson, while Big Ben was going 15-1 in his debut season. Romo is what some would call a "Late Bloomer". Big Ben is what most would call a "winner".
Permalink | Reply
WardenVarsity
430 days ago
Score -1+-
Man, since the debating skills here are so overwhelming, I should just give up. To wit: "Ben is better than Romo." Deadly in its certainty. Thanks for that stirring argument. If it was your team getting the bad whistle all day, I'm sure Steelers fans would be proving their equanimity and good sportsmanship at every turn. Excuse me for my skepticism in that regard, judging from the low mental acumen I've seen from most Steelers fans I've had the misfortune to encounter in my 40 years of watching football. I now add you two putzes to that ignominious list.

Then it's the genius of "Where was Romo his first two years." To begin to explain why a free agent QB from division iia football might have to sit a while ... why bother? Oh boy, there was a poll where Romo didn't come in first. Why should I defer to someone else's opinion over my own? I would take Romo first among all those QB's, followed by Ben, then Rivers, then Cutler...

Stiles, you're so easy to ignore. But since it gives you some vicarious thrill to think that you're getting to me in some way, allow me to counter with the following non-sports question. Will your hero George "the Liberator" Bush's legacy be in any way shaped by the disastrous financial mess his Republican tax cutting and deficit raising policies have led to? After all, you said Bush would be judged favorably for his sagacious Middle East policy of preemptive invasion? Chew on that a while, you yuppie fraud.
Permalink | Reply
JuTMSY4Legend
430 days ago
Score 4+-
Excuse me for my skepticism in that regard, judging from the low mental acumen I've seen from most Steelers fans I've had the misfortune to encounter in my 40 years of watching football. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black...
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
430 days ago
Score 1+-
"Yuppie Fraud"!!!

Priceless!!! You got me pegged to a T!!! Wow, just write my biography for me, you are so dead on!

"Stiles, you're so easy to ignore." - It is so easy. Everything is easy for the "the Great".

"Bore-den the Great" stands by his golden-gilded, jealousy-birthing words!!! I am soooooooo jealous and flabergasted by his overwhelming awesomeness!

I am so honored that Bore-den asked me to answer a political question. Now can somebody translate it into my native Dontgivafuckian language?
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
430 days ago
Score 2+-
sure: "Republicans suck" I'm paraphrasing, but i think you get the idea
Permalink
Steel TownDraft Pick
430 days ago
Score 4+-
I can tell you why he sat. Because he wasn't good enough, that's why. It took him 3 years to learn the system and improve his mechanics. He has improved remarkably I'm sure. but, you can't coach calm nerves pal. Thus far Romo has shown he will always buckle under pressure. Be it a game ending Pick 6 or just an ill timed fumble. He can throw for all the yards and TDs he wants, but in the end he is like a running back that can't get the tough yards. He has shown in his short career (or should I say short time as a starter) that he will not succeed when it matters most. So, you can take butterfingers over all those other QBs if you want, I'll take the one with the proven track record.


The reason I pointed out that he was a bench warmer for two years was to point out that he has more years in than Ben, with less to show for it. You asked me to explain to you how stats and performance show that Ben is better than Romo. That's what I have done. I presented the stats that I felt proved my point. Most telling is the QB rating which as you stated yourself shows that Ben made better decisions with the ball. But, it's not just the infamous ill timed fumbles or just the lower QB rating or just the lack of post season victory (including a superbowl), it's all of those things together that make Ben better. You disagree? Fine. But I don't see how that makes me stupid. Frankly speaking, calling all Steelers fans stupid really just makes you look like an ignorant homer.

enjoy your weekend
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
430 days ago
Score 3+-
JuT, does this guy have brain damage or what? He seems to think he knows all about me, but I think he's talking about someone else who lives in his head.

And I agree. Yes, Republicans do suck - Almost as much as Democrats. But here's the million dollar question - why does he think I care about politics?? Is he SO in need of validation that he must conjure arguments he thinks he can win just so he won't be reminded how much of a loser he is???

I mean he's already pegged himself as a basker in reflected glory ("The Cowboys are good, therefore I am good").

Oh, nevermind... I just can't wait for him to write another article so I can "take notes" about how to take other writer's articles and quote them.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
430 days ago
Score 3+-
ST, its not Romo's fault he couldn't start, afterall, he had greats like Vinny Testeverde and Drew Bledsoe in front of him
Permalink
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
430 days ago
Score 4+-
Warden, I am proud to be on your ignominious list. Far and away, Cowboy fans are the most annoying of all NFL fans. Why? Because 90 percent of them are frontrunners. I suspect this might be the case with you. As for Steelers fans, I don't remember hearing a ton of whining that year that the league sent FOUR letters of apology to the team following losses that were caused by blown officials calls. FOUR! (Jut, surely you remember the Eagles game? :-) ) Steelers fans are just like any other teams' fans - they're great fans. Of course, I discount Cowboys fans, as they are, as noted previously, front runners.


As for Big Ben/Romo - 1 Super Bowl ring/zero, multiple playoff wins/zero, no placement fumbles/one (directly leading to the Cowboys loss?). Who's better? I am having trouble finding anything to push Romo over Ben. It's too bad - I liked Romo as a QB before this. Now I might have to reevaluate this.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
430 days ago
Score 0+-
no idea what you're talking about sj ; - )
Permalink
WardenVarsity
430 days ago
Score -4+-
"I presented the stats that I felt proved my point." And left out the ones that disproved it, Steel Town? And you prove my point(s) once again.

Wasn't it that famous Oxford monster back Jonathan "Big Game" Swift who said, "When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him." Don't you see how much you all represent this quote when all the mental midgets here insist on taking me on? I love the sheep or herd mentality! I thrive on it, absolutely live for confrontation! It's like the air I breathe. I couldn't wait to see what the simpletons would come up with today!!

Look, I can sit here and be modest and pretend everyone's opinions have equal weight. Who would I be fooling? Look back at all my pieces, go through the archives. Bottom line: I'm right far more than I'm wrong, I have a writing style that can't be duplicated. What can I say? Should I apologize for sticking up for myself?

I'm not an arrogant guy in real life, if anything I don't stick up for myself. But I am having fun with this, hope you guys are too. Except oh yeah: I really don't care what you all think. Later, losers.
Permalink | Reply
Steel TownDraft Pick
430 days ago
Score 2+-
'"I presented the stats that I felt proved my point." And left out the ones that disproved it, Steel Town? And you prove my point(s) once again.' - What, the yards and touchdowns. I addressed those also, when I stated that they don't matter if your not succeeding when it counts. So, once again you are...wait for it...WRONG. That might be hard for you to understand since you are right far more, but the truth hurts no matter how ignorant you are. For the record, you are the only one who thinks your writing style can't be duplicated. Nothing about it stands out. Go ahead and be the internet tough guy you think you are, but I think I know who the real loser is here.
Permalink
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
430 days ago
Score 2+-
Romo?
Permalink
KelsdadAll-Star
430 days ago
Score 4+-
Wow, and people say I'm a condescending asshole.
Permalink
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
430 days ago
Score 3+-
We never said asshole... :-)
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
430 days ago
Score 2+-
"I'm not an arrogant guy in real life," - the internet isn't real life, it's Make Believe Land!!!
Permalink
KelsdadAll-Star
430 days ago
Score 1+-
One person did, and I have yet to see anybody disagree :)
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
430 days ago
Score 1+-
in all fairness, he was talking about your response...
Permalink
KelsdadAll-Star
430 days ago
Score 1+-
You did too, but I couldn't find the comment.
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
430 days ago
Score 2+-
KD, I've called you an asshole, but never condescending... weird huh?
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
430 days ago
Score 1+-
its on a poll somewhere i think...so yeah, lost in the abyss, heh
Permalink
KelsdadAll-Star
430 days ago
Score 2+-
Thanks, Manny. Being called condescending really bothers me.
Permalink
KelsdadAll-Star
430 days ago
Score 2+-
That was a good one too, fogged my glasses...
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
430 days ago
Score 0+-
FP's also got one out there in a lockerroom "article" (what are they called really..."lockerrooms?")
Permalink
KelsdadAll-Star
430 days ago
Score 1+-
Yeah, but he doesn't count.
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
430 days ago
Score 3+-
"I have a writing style that can't be duplicated"

That's because no matter how many shits you take, every turd is unique.

"I really don't care what you all think." - The more you tell yourself that "Bore-den the Great", it still isn't coming true.


"I'm right far more than I'm wrong." - do you want a medal or a chest to pin it on?


Don't forget - you don't care what we think, so we MUST be jealous, right?!!! HA HA HA HA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!
Permalink | Reply
JuTMSY4Legend
430 days ago
Score 1+-
if I were right more than I'm wrong, I'd gamble a whole hell of a lot...
Permalink
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
430 days ago
Score 3+-
and you wouldn't be a Cowboy fan
Permalink
Steel TownDraft Pick
430 days ago
Score 3+-
For someone who doesn't care what people think you sure did send a few nasty messages to ASD.
Permalink | Reply
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
430 days ago
Score 1+-
He doesn't care what people think because he thinks for us. He thinks we are jealous of how awesome he is...
Permalink
AmphibiousSportsDuoVarsity
430 days ago
Score 3+-
I just asked if he'd be my valentine.
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
430 days ago
Score 0+-
and....?
Permalink
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free
Categories: Opinions | Opinions by User Warden | September 17, 2008 | September 2008

Don't Miss

Phillies World Series 2009: A Year Later, and They Still Don't Want Us
Sorry, But I'm Not Sorry
2009 NHL Preview
In Which Ricketts Wins World Series
2009 Week 3: Let’s Talk About Your Favorite NFL Team

In the News

The Detroit Red Wings defeated the San Jose Sharks 2-1 ending their winning streak at six.

Comments of the Day

0 +++++
0 Why will you get trashed for stating the obvious truth? &...
0 this is a really cool list. i like the idea of using ...

Take a Poll

What manager or coach was credited with kicking dirt onto Jocko Conlan's shoes at home plate?
Walter Alston Casey Stengel Leo Deroucher Billy Martin

New Articles

Allie Reynolds' Amazing 1952 World Series
Manning vs. Brady
Enough of the SHEEEEET Talk
I can't believe how close-minded people are regarding the Belichick call!
Giants Showing Interest in Uggla, Damon

Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Article:One_Eyed_King"

This page was last modified 22:20, 17 September 2008. Content is available under the GFDL.

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise