armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan

About the Author

Ron Sen, MD
Busy, busy, busy, with family, work, and hobbies.

More By Ron Sen, MD

Sox and Steroids
9 votes, 3 comments
Reality TV: The NFL Draft
7 votes, 0 comments
Mind Numbing Baseball or Instant Classic?
8 votes, 10 comments
View All

Other recent contributors

Make this page better by editing it.

Other recent voters

If you like the article, vote for it.
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Newspapers and Dinosaurs Going the Same Direction

by Ron Sen, MD
created April 06, 2009, last edited June 20, 2009
15
Vote

If you can't beat 'em, shut 'em down. That may be the motto of the Times, as The Boston Globe is on notice to shrink or die. If the Globe goes under, then who will assume the reporting and columnist mantle?

April baseball has different meanings to fans. Some see Opening Day as a reason to skip school, others see it as an annual renewal of the seasons, and many see it as the beginning leg of the journey that is a baseball season. April baseball often has a punitive flavor as MLB isn't smart enough to play the first few series in snow-free climates.

I have written that the Red Sox should be considered favorites to win their third title of the decade, but baseball's marathon has little tolerance for error. Three factors often determine the outcome over the long season, 1) injuries, 2) performance in one-run games, and 3) performance variation.

Every team has injuries. Last season the Sox lost Josh Beckett, David Ortiz, and Daisuke Matsuzaka for various periods. The Yankees were without Chien-Ming Wang and Philip Hughes for extended time, and the Rays lost Evan Longoria, Carl Crawford, and Troy Percival.

Whether through luck or pluck, the ability to win close games often determines champions from also-rans. Last season Tampa went 29-18 in one-run games, and the Sox were 22-23, a six game swing in a division the Rays captured by two games. The Rays also bested the Sox 10-8 head-to-head in the regular season, another reason why they came out on top and went into the postseason with home field advantage, which they used to get to the World Series

What do I mean by performance variation? Examples illustrate the incredible overachievement that can happen for a player. Mark Belanger won eight Gold Gloves for the Orioles, but hit only .228 over 18 seasons. Yet he hit .287 in 1969 for a team that went to the World Series. Dwight Evans had a predilection for higher production every other year early in his career. Like Belanger he also won eight Gold Gloves. George Scott, "the Boomer", hit .303 in the Sox American League pennant season of 1967, and followed it up with a .171 season in 1968. Ironically, Scott also won eight Gold Gloves. For a .268 career hitter to hit almost a hundred points under his average is remarkable, yet shows that anything can happen in baseball.

So, while we often talk as though we 'know' what will happen, actual events may be far less certain than we expect, with the prospect of injury, illness, and randomness contributing to wide statistical variation accounting for erratic individual performance and winning percentage in close games.

So with the newspapers going the direction of dinosaurs, let the bloggers assume our opportunity to step in when the print media disappears locally. Play ball!


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
Ron Sen, MDRed-Shirting
265 days ago
Score 4+-
Sorry...forgot to log in when writing. Jeez I'll never get to varsity this way...
Permalink | Reply
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
265 days ago
Score 2+-
Eh, besides having first dibs on the cheerleaders (have you seen AGM's cheerleaders?), it's not worth much... Fixed it for you, Doc.
Permalink
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
265 days ago
Score 5+-
I subscribe to the Chicago Tribune. Always have. And as long as it remains alive, I always will. What would I read if the frigging IP went down? On a somewhat related dinosaur issue, I've gotten into listening to vinyl instead of digital. Just listened to Jimi Hendrix and Buddy Guy over the weekend. Even on a crap set up like mine (waiting for the kids to get a little older first), the sound of vinyl is indeed sweet!
Permalink | Reply
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
265 days ago
Score 1+-
Awww... vinyl!

Analog is warm/soft/smooth/rounded and digital is cold/hard/stiff/square. Most people will never care to notice (or care about) the difference.

I work with a lot of music and I use both (convenience=digital; let's see you jog with a turntable!) but I often say that it's subtle but so is the difference a cigarette and a cigar to most people... the more you know the medium, the more you see the entire spectrum.

It's the difference between a Ford and a Ferrari... after all, they both get you there, right?

My Dad has an old reel-to-reel 8 track recorder and has recordings from the 60's and 70's on it. When you listen to them you can smell the cigarettes and spilled beer in the room... you can hear the musicians body movements and positionings as they are playing their instruments... subtleties...

Analog might be a dinosaur to the mass population but it ain't going anywhere.
Permalink
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
265 days ago
Score 4+-
I jog with the an ipod shuffle. But there is a huge difference between "having on music" versus "enjoying and appreciating music".

It really is pretty neat to have digital compact devices such as ipods but there is nothing - absolutely nothing - better than throwing on a classic vinyl lp and letting'er rip.

Great to see vinyl sales picking up again.
Permalink
False ProphetAll-Star
265 days ago
Score 2+-
I don't know Tyrone, maybe it's just that I'm part of a different generation (read one that did not grow up with vinyl) but I love being able to make a playlist consisting of 50-60 different tunes from various artists/time periods/genres, dock my iphone in the speaker, and listen to the variety of tunes, styles, and speeds while I'm working on something.

Plus, digital players really brings out the different layers of each song, and the quality is always the same.

Once again, I didn't grow up to vinyl, so I never really developed an appreciation for it.
Permalink
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
265 days ago
Score 1+-
I can see both sides of this. It is nice to get your playlists going on something that isn't much larger than a credit card. Of course, part of the charm of records was getting the record home and putting it on the turntable, then sitting down with the lyrics, photos and liner notes while the music played.


To me, records are just more personal. But that could just be me romanticizing things. I embrace the digital age for the reasons that FP states - it is great. Now my problem is having tons of music to listen to and not enough time to listen. The dangers of easier availability, I guess. There are worse fates, I suppose...
Permalink
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
265 days ago
Score 1+-
Oh don't get me wrong, digital definitely has a few advantages, especially for playlists and single tracks But my preference for vinyl (especially older classics recorded on analog) is to appreciate an album from beginning to end. Not sure when you last heard a favorite album on vinyl but do yourself a favor and check it out. You might be surprised by the sound difference.
Permalink
False ProphetAll-Star
265 days ago
Score 1+-
TB like I said, it's probably a generational thing. Hell, I'm willing to bet in 30 years, if I post on a sports forum like this and talk about the wonders of the ipod/digital music, some teenager will read my post, read it again, read it one more time to make sure what he saw was accurate, laugh, and then ask me what the hell I'm smoking.
Permalink
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
265 days ago
Score 1+-
Just imagine what technology and mass communication vehicles we'll have in 30 years...
Permalink
CheezerAll-Star
265 days ago
Score 1+-
I missed out on another conversation.

My youngest is 6 and wants an I-pod touch. I tell him not to worry. By the time he becomes a high schooler and we consider getting an I-pod of some sort for him, he'll just jack his earphones into the 'net. Then I tell him to go play with his Bokugon and stop worrying about an I-pod (sheesh).

I agree that there is something about spinning an album that has a nice feel to it. However, it is emotional. For pure sound quality, nothing beats a CD. The Signal-to-Noise ratio for a CD is about 93-96dB, mp3: ~82-83dB, Cassette: ~70dB and vinyl: ~ 60dB. For the record, I listen to all of them.

As for the evolution of technology, let me put it visual entertainment terms. We recently went digital (late, I know) and now my kids want to go Blue Ray. I tell them that he next TV I get will have holograms.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
265 days ago
Score 0+-
If the Boston Globe dies, I won't much care. The Herald has a better sports page anyway, and that's the only part of a newspaper I'd actually pick up and read.
Permalink | Reply
TrizzAll-American
265 days ago
Score 2+-
Agree I'm a Herald guy anyway...hell i'll grab a metro if im on the subway the Globe is for New Englanders who are ALMOST Bostonians...Blogs > Columns...everything else in the newspaper is regurgitated AP news feeds anyway
Permalink
False ProphetAll-Star
265 days ago
Score 0+-
Trizz speaks the truth. Newspapers are going down the drain because they're regurgitating the AP news feed from last night. If I want to read about the big headlines, I have the internet. The paper is for interesting series and local news.
Permalink
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
265 days ago
Score 1+-
I'm guessing the papers have little choice but to regurgitate the AP. Otherwise, they would have to pay their writers salaries, expenses and benefits. With the AP feed, they can just pay a set fee and take what they like, no fuss, no muss.


It is a shame to see newspapers going down the drain.
Permalink
False ProphetAll-Star
265 days ago
Score 0+-
but my point is that it's a self-fulfilling prophecy. They switch to the AP so fewer people subscribe so they have to fire more writers so fewer subscribe, etc.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
265 days ago
Score 1+-
The Metro is actually a solid paper. A USA Today for Boston. It's short and sweet.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
265 days ago
Score 0+-
I like to find the typos in the metro...I average about 4 per page... and this is speaking as someone who types many...many...typos
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
265 days ago
Score 1+-
Next time I ride the T, I'm going to bring a red pen and correct the Metro typos before I leave the paper on the seat.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
265 days ago
Score 1+-
Did you see the edition with Ariana Huffington as Guest Editor? I think it was a few weeks ago... When does Matt Drudge get his shot?
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
265 days ago
Score 0+-
HAHAHA no, I only take the T once in awhile. Although if I'm ever a famous writer, or famous anything, I'd call the Metro and offer to write and/or edit columns for free.
Permalink
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
265 days ago
Score 0+-
The 1968 is sort of an abbeartion (sp?). In the AL, only Yaz batted over .300 for the year, so Scott's low average, while being very low, is probably reflective of the league's cumulative average. But this aside, the points you make are good ones. Winning one run games is good prep for the playoffs, as, theoretically, only the best teams with the best pitchers are still around.


And speaking of 1968, how the heck did Bob Gibson manage to lose 9 games with a 1.12 ERA??? One run games...?
Permalink | Reply
Ron Sen, MDRed-Shirting
265 days ago
Score 2+-
I think Gibson lost SEVEN games 1-0...and he also had one 'blow out' where he pitched less than 2 innings and gave up five runs (I think). Heck, I'm old. That was a long time ago.
Permalink | Reply
Tmil42AAA-er
265 days ago
Score 4+-
Dinosaurs are made up.


-Carl Everett.


I'd try to come up with something more clever, but I've got a case of the Mondays.
Permalink | Reply
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
265 days ago
Score 2+-
Yeah, uh...I'm going to need you to, uh....jump to conclusions! And please don't forget the TPS sheet.
Permalink
SSreportersLegend
265 days ago
Score 2+-
Newspapers are dying for many reasons:

1. In a world where instant gratification is the goal, if I'm in Boston and the Monday Night Football game ends late, I won't be able to read it until Wednesday. The "newspaper" has nothing new that hasn't broken on the internet or on the local news channel.


2. 30% of newspaper is advertising. When every other page is filled with talk about a sale at JC Penney's, I can't read the newspaper.


3. Journalists have gotten lazy. Admit it, journalism has become so bad and they know it. They have stopped caring about their work and putting up some of the worst pieces I've ever seen. It's riddled with spelling mistakes, typos, and horrible grammar. That technology part comes in as a negative because they assume that their writing is fine as long as there isn't a red line under a specific word or a green line over a sentence fragment. They're also reporting on fluff pieces that aren't hard hitting at all. It's become filtered news dressed up as "solid journalism". I don't give a crap about what dress Michelle Obama is wearing, I want to know about the story behind what Madoff did instead of skid along the surface. Not many journalists and columnists still care and respect their own work, they respect the check they get from their boss.


I LOVE blogging about sports and chatting with other sports fans because it's my passion. I don't get paid to write or have access to the locker rooms.

I just write as a FAN.
Permalink | Reply
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
265 days ago
Score 0+-
Is it the journalists or the editors dropping the ball?
Permalink
Steel TownDraft Pick
265 days ago
Score 1+-
1. Agreed about the instant gratification. If I want breaking news, I am not turning to the paper. But, I have also NEVER had to wait till Weds to read about the Monday night game.


2. 30% of the Pittsburgh papers are not advertising. I don't know about your local papers.
3. Most of this last statement is nothing more than your opinion without any support. It's the standard "newspapers are dying" garbage. Yes newpaper readership is going down hill. They must evolve and frankly they are. You are kidding yourself if you think most of the blogosphere has less typos and better writing than the newspaper. It may not be the news you want to read about, and that's fine. But don't pretend like the newspaper is full of fluff and stories about what Michelle Obama is wearing. Newspapers simply report on the facts, it's up to you to form opinions and write Blogs (editorials). I'll take my newspaper over TV news anyday.

The newspapers simply have to adjust to their new roles.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
265 days ago
Score 2+-
I read the sports section in the Boston Herald whenever there's a big sports story, not for the breaking news, but for the opinions of educated and experienced columnists.


I agree with ST, the argument "Journalists have gotten lazy" is very broad and difficult to prove. Perhaps newspaper journalists have always been the way they are now, but in 2009 there is more competition to cull the herd. In 1910, there were 2,600 daily newspapers in the US. In 2000, there were 1,500. TV and radio took out the newspaper as a source of news, the internet is killing it as a source of opinion. But I don't think the newspapers have gotten worse than they were, unless it's been due to a brain drain of journalists going into other media instead of newspapers.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
265 days ago
Score 1+-
The phrase "Newspapers are dying" is a bit of a misnomer. Newspapers have been steadily regressing for decades. The last things they had - their opinions and credibility - are now very available on TV thanks to cable news, and the internet. Not all will die. But those that survive will have to evolve.


Or maybe the government will bail them out.
Permalink | Reply
JuTMSY4Legend
265 days ago
Score 2+-
sorta already are with the non-profit avenue being proposed... the word "Pravda" comes to mind...
Permalink
CheezerAll-Star
265 days ago
Score 2+-
Why not socialize the news as well...
Permalink
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
265 days ago
Score 2+-
BBC... CBC... USBC???
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
265 days ago
Score 0+-
NPR
Permalink
Oh No RomoDraft Pick
265 days ago
Score 2+-
PBS
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
265 days ago
Score 1+-
Are newspapers dying or has marketing and advertising become smarter?
Permalink | Reply
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
265 days ago
Score 0+-
Interesting question. Anyone here buy something recent because of a newspaper ad?
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
265 days ago
Score 0+-
Only if it included a coupon or I found out about some sort of deal through the ad.
Permalink
Pittsburgh GunnyMajor Leaguer
265 days ago
Score 1+-
I quit reading newspapers in 1987.
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free
Categories: Opinions | Opinions by User Ron Sen, MD | April 6, 2009 | April 2009

Don't Miss

Games on Holidays: Yay or Nay?
Phillies World Series 2009: A Year Later, and They Still Don't Want Us
Sorry, But I'm Not Sorry
2009 NHL Preview
In Which Ricketts Wins World Series

In the News

Hey ArmchairGM users! Want to help the admins update this news section? Click here to help us out.

Comments of the Day

2 In related news, the Indianapolis Colts were named Bitch-Ass Pus...
2 Amir, you should suggest that to Congress which seems to ...
1 Agreed. That was pretty weak. How nice to dump the game i...
1 It is pretty simple. If more people felt the same as V...
1 Perfectly funny and right on the money

Take a Poll

Who were the greatest righthanders and lefthanders strike out pitchers in the Major Leagues.
Ryan/Koufax R Johnson/Ryan Ryan/W Johnson Steve C/W Johnson

New Articles

The Yankees' Raid Kansas City
Ghillie suit
Celek/Selleck Combo a Hit Among Philadelphia-Area Senior Citizens
Kentucky Middle School Football Association 2010 FBU All-American Bowl Selection
The 1962 Giants Were Better, but the Yankees Had Kansas City

Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Article:Newspapers_and_Dinosaurs_Going_the_Same_Direction"

This page was last modified 00:00, 7 April 2009. Content is available under the GFDL.

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise