armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan

About the Author

Crackajg
The Resume

More By Crackajg

Fantasy Football 2009's Comatose Sleepers
13 votes, 7 comments
The Freudian Fumble Quiz: What Kind of Fantasy Football Personality Do You Have?
17 votes, 11 comments
Seventh Heaven: The Top Seven Fantasy Rookie Running Backs of 2009
5 votes, 0 comments
View All

Other recent contributors

Make this page better by editing it.

Other recent voters

If you like the article, vote for it.
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

NFL History 101: Top Running Backs

by Crackajg
created May 13, 2008, last edited July 29, 2009
36
Vote

In yet another new feature, Sport Crack presents NFL History 101, in which I will discuss the history of the game… whether that be the top skill positions, top games, top anything. It’s my mission to bring you a history lesson that you most certainly will not fall asleep through. At least I hope not...

Anyway, first up: NFL History 101: Top Running Backs.

<cue dramatic NFL history music>

It’s gone by many names in it’s storied history. The running back. The tailback. The fullback. The halfback. Each one exhibit’s a certain mystique. Each one suggests that the player it is the title of is a game changer, a skilled athlete who can take punishment like no other position in sports.

To run the ball into a group of rabid behemoths 20-30 times a game takes a certain kind of player. Hell, it takes a certain kind of person. Many say that the quarterback is the heart of the team, but I say it’s the one who takes a beating play in and play out. I say it’s the one who is the target of a kill the man with the ball mentality of the opposing defense for about a third of the entire game.

There have been many men who have graced us with their athleticism and toughness in the storied history of the NFL. So many that it’s almost a travesty to try and classify each one into a list. It just doesn’t make any sense to try and rank them from best to almost best when each one had their own strengths and their own ways in which they entertained us through the various mediums we enjoyed them with.

How do you measure receiving yards versus career yards per game? What about the amount of touchdowns one scored? If you favor one, your limiting the other and it finally dawned on me that there was only one way to do this. To shit with rankings, let’s just take a look at the best running backs.

So in no particular order, here is a brief profile of the top running backs the NFL has ever seen. There’s no sense trying to rank them because it would do them an injustice. Until someone comes up with a formula to put all of their careers on a level playing field (which I‘m pretty sure will never happen…), it’s just no use. Stop trying to rank them! Just appreciate what they each did individually for the game of football!

As with everything I write, feel free to agree or disagree vehemently in the comments. It’s why I do it.


Jerome Bettis

Jerome Bettis, or “The Bus” as he was formally known as will go down in NFL history as a touchdown machine. His running style exhibited the traits of a bus in more ways than one… he could either run through you like road kill, or he could turn on a higher gear and run right by you. In 13 years (3 of which were with the Rams [and 2 of which of those were when the Rams were still in L.A.]) he racked up 13,662 yards and bowled his way through the goal line for 91 touchdowns. Nearly half those years he was awarded a trip to the Pro Bowl and he is fifth all time in career rushing yards and tied for tenth for all time touchdowns. To think that all that time he had asthma… amazing.

Career highlights: 6-time Pro Bowler & 2-time first-team All-Pro (13 year NFL career)


Walter Payton

Nicknamed “Sweetness” in college, Walter Payton would go on to have one of the finest careers the NFL had ever seen. Rushing for 16,726 yards and an astonishing 110 touchdown’s, Payton’s career is easily one of the best ever. Coach Mike Ditka even went so far as to say that Payton was the greatest football player he had ever seen, which is no small feat. Why the man was nicknamed Sweetness is up for debate. Some have said it was acronym for how he ran the ball (which was extremely aggressive). Others have said it stemmed from his easy going personality and still others have said it was because of the ease he played the game with. No matter what the case, The Sweetness will go down as one of the best rushers the game of football has ever seen.

Career highlights: 9-time Pro Bowler & 5-time first-team All-Pro (13 year NFL career)


Barry Sanders

Arguably one of the most thrilling, electric runners of all time, Barry Sanders was generally regarded as a human highlight reel. No matter where he touched the ball, or the situation of the defenders in his proximity, he was always a threat to bring it in for six. His 15,269 and 99 touchdowns is all the more impressive when you take into account that he never really had a capable offensive unit around him (not to mention his offensive lines…). Although his retirement before the 1999 season shocked the entire football world, his career stats and classy reputation put him into the conversation of best backs to have ever played the game.

Career highlights: 10-time Pro Bowler & 6-time first-team All-Pro (10 year NFL career)


Marshall Faulk

Perhaps the best “complete” back of all time, Marshall Faulk brought an entirely different dynamic to the running back position. He could kill you by rushing the ball but he could also kill you catching the ball out of the backfield. Not only do his 12,279 career yards with 100 rushing touchdowns put him on the map for one of the best backs, his 6,875 receiving yards with 36 touchdown’s finish the conversation. While not the best running back of all time, a strong case can be put up for Faulk to have been the most complete all around running back the NFL has or ever will see.

Career highlights: 7-time Pro Bowler & 3-time first-team All-Pro (12 year NFL career)


Jim Brown

Just nine years in the league and Jim Brown is proclaimed by many more knowledgeable than I as the best back to ever play the game. Sure, we can compare stats, but by pure athleticism and dominance, Brown makes a strong case as the best back to have played the professional game. In his mere nine years in the NFL, Brown rushed for 12,312 and 106 touchdowns. Not to mention, he was named to the Pro Bowl in all nine of his NFL seasons. His dominance, at a time when many NFL legends were born builds him a strong case for best ever. If he is or not is of no concern, because all that I need to know is that I was born 25 years too early, fore I never got to witness the force that was Jim Brown.

Career highlights: 9-time Pro Bowler & 8-time first-team All-Pro (9 year NFL career)


Curtis Martin

Curtis Martin’s career is often look at how he the player was looked at when he was playing. Sure, he was a great running back -- but look a little closer and you might just find a little more. 14,101 yards and 90 touchdowns are offset only by some of his inconsistent years. Not to mention he had perhaps one of the best rookie seasons of any running back in the history of the league (1,487 yards and 14 touchdowns on 368 attempts). No matter what the case against Curtis Martin, he had himself a fantastic career and was a class act similar to Barry Sanders. He went about his business and did what he could to win. Because of this, he’s one of the best in my opinion.

Career highlights: 5-time Pro Bowler & 1-time first-team All-Pro (11 year NFL career)


Emmitt Smith

Regardless of the comparisons between he and Barry Sanders, and his new position as wordsmith on ESPN, Emmitt Smith had a fantastic career. While some will say he had the best career ever, it was certainly in part to the talent he had around him. None the less, Smith had skills, and those skills, surrounded by supreme talent or not, rushed for 18,355 yards and 164 touchdowns (most all time in both categories). Both of these accomplishments will be the mark to beat in the NFL for many years to come.

Career highlights: 8-time Pro Bowler & 4-time first-team All-Pro (15 year NFL career)


Marcus Allen

Yes, he played 16 years, but instead of knocking him for it -- why not give him a hand? The man had less than 100 attempts only twice in his sixteen year career and took an absolute beating en route to 12,243 yards and 123 touchdowns (second all time). A Marshall Faulk before their was one, Marcus Allen caught 587passes for 5,411 yards and 21 touchdowns. In conjunction with his rushing stats (which may be a bit low in the yards per game category) expose Allen as one of the most skillful, tough players to have ever played the game.

Career highlights: 6-time Pro Bowler & 2-time first-team All-Pro (16 year NFL career)


Eric Dickerson

A running back mercenary for hire if you will, Dickerson played for four different teams in his twelve year career. Not one to have scenery alter his play, Dickerson would rush for 13,259 yards and 90 touchdowns. When he retired, he was second all time in rushing yards behind Walter Payton. Unfortunately for him (but fortunately for us) the NFL was in an influx for talented all time rushers, with Jerome Bettis, Curtis Martin, Barry Sanders and Emmit Smith eventually passing him. Dickerson’s 90.8 yards per game remains one of the best all time averages in NFL history.

Career highlights: 6-time Pro Bowler & 5-time first-team All-Pro (12 year NFL career)


Franco Harris

12,120 and 91 touchdowns? A nine time Pro Bowler in thirteen seasons? A focal point in one of the best offenses who have ever played? Franco Harris is a legend in the NFL, never mind his lore in Pittsburgh. I’m not even from Pittsburgh and I get jitters watching him tear it up in the old school games with the Steelers. Maybe he was overshadowed by a bunch of other players on the same team, but Franco Harris had one hell of a career.

Career highlights: 9-time Pro Bowler & 1-time first-team All-Pro


John Riggins

Known as “The Diesel” to teammates and fans, John Riggins is arguably the best Redskins running back of all time. His pure grit and toughness led him to a respectable 11,352 yards and 104 touchdowns (sixth all time). In his fourteen year career, Riggins carried the ball nearly 3,000 times -- an amazing accomplishment considering his reckless abandon running style.

Career highlights: 1-time Pro Bowler & 1-time first-team All-Pro (14 year NFL career)


LaDainian Tomlinson

About to enter his eighth NFL season, L.T. is in position to strike as perhaps the greatest running back we have every seen. Already third on the list of career rushing touchdowns (with 115), Tomlinson is equally as dangerous on the ground as well. He has a 4.5 rushing average for his career and if he can hold up a mere two more years, he could very well jump into the Top 10 rushing yards of all time. While it may strike some as surprising to already name someone still playing as one of the best of all time, L.T. has shown that even if he retires tomorrow, he could be put into the conversation with ease. The reason I included him is because he is my generations premier back -- we are going to be talking about him 10, 20 years from now. So boys and girls who are under the age of 25 like me -- enjoy this man make history while you still can.

Career highlights: 5-time Pro Bowler & 3-time first-team All-Pro (7 year NFL career… and still going!)


Other notable backs: O.J. Simpson, Tony Dorsett, Thurman Thomas, Gale Sayers, Earl Campbell

Again, this is not the end all be all list. If you feel that someone was left off of my list, you’re probably right! But state why in the comments, it’s why this site exist! And who do you think is THE best all time? Let the debates begin!!

(And what kind of writer would I be if I didn’t source the absolutely amazing http://pro-football-reference.com -- if you’re at all interested in football history, than go there. You will not leave.)


In your opinion, who's the best RB of all time?
Loading...
Jim Brown
Emmitt Smith
Barry Sanders
Marshall Faulk
Walter Payton

Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
KelsdadAll-Star
565 days ago
Score 8+-
Good work, Crack, hard to argue with anyone on the list.
Permalink | Reply
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
565 days ago
Score 4+-
Nice to see two Steelers guys there. I'm especially glad to see a list eschew rankings and simply talk about great running backs. Without the rankings, all we're left to talk about are the backs and their accomplishments. So many to talk about...and I think you hit all the right names. Well done.
Permalink | Reply
Tej8722JV Squad
565 days ago
Score 4+-
Beauty, well done without the rankings clouding it up.
Permalink | Reply
Steel TownDraft Pick
564 days ago
Score 4+-
Great article. Glad to see Bettis and Martin on there. There are usually the honorable mention guys. I couldn't agree more with your assessment of Tomlinson. I tell my friends all the time, "quit whining and watch this guy. We are watching the next great back".
Permalink | Reply
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
564 days ago
Score 3+-
I think if I would want to see an honorable mention added, it would be Earl Campbell. I wish I had a better memory of him. But the NFL Films clips do a good job of telling his story.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
564 days ago
Score 2+-
What's fascinating about this is the "best back debate"

Barry and Jim had the talent

Faulk and Payton have the championships

and Emmitt has the record (and a few rings himself)

If you looked at pure numbers, how could you not go smith?

But if you looked a little deeper its practically too close to call
Permalink | Reply
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
564 days ago
Score 5+-
Best back - where's Harris in that discussion? I believe at the time of his retirement, he was second in NFL history in yards, had 4 super bowl rings and held the record for yards gained in a super bowl game. These achievements may have been eclipsed since then...but at that time, he contributed mightily to what is arguably one of the top NFL dynasties.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
564 days ago
Score 1+-
Franco Who? ; - )
Permalink
Steel TownDraft Pick
564 days ago
Score 2+-
BOOOOOOOOOOOO He didn't become Franco Who until he went to Seattle.
Permalink
ShrubberyVarsity Captain
564 days ago
Score 0+-
It's not that close...look at yards per carry. Only Jim Brown and Barry Sanders averaged 5+ yds/carry for their career. Mercury Morris and Bo Jackson also had ypc above 5 but had half the touches Brown & Sanders did. Brown & Saanders are the best RB's ever, and frankly it's not that close. tomlinson has a shot to reach their stratosphere though.
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #1
386 days ago
Score 0+-
no ist not too close to call imean bary had stats with o help all these backs had decent teams...i mean he had great stats from the lions ball club with no o line....if u look at films it was mostly him with them yards
Permalink
BigPPupMajor Leaguer
564 days ago
Score 4+-
Great list, glad to see the ballsy move adding Martin and Bettis, not sure I agree with it, but I like it.
Permalink | Reply
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
564 days ago
Score 2+-
I like it too - and I am getting tired of hearing Mike Greenberg refer to Bettis as an 'accumulator' of yards. As though all it took for him to reach that number was to have been on the field. The guy worked for those yards!
Permalink
BigPPupMajor Leaguer
564 days ago
Score 4+-
As much as anyone Bettis earned his yards by being a physical runner. I give him credit for that.
Permalink
CheezerAll-Star
564 days ago
Score 6+-
Great Summary! I agree completely with leaving the rankings out. That just confuses the issue.

One thing I notice is that other than Jim Brown, all the running backs are from the 70's or more modern times. That discounts 50 years of football. Unfortunately, I cannot think of any memorable backs from earlier eras. Maybe it's because the modern players get a lot more carries (with the longer seasons and better training techniques) than the old timers did.

It's so hard to compare across eras. Especially when you factor in the rule changes of 1978.
Permalink | Reply
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
564 days ago
Score 4+-
Cheezer, I thought the same thing and looked up a few names...Bronko Nagurski, Jim Thorpe, Paul Hornung, Red Grange...The players are legends, but the numbers don't support their inclusion on a list like this. Hornung was just over 3,000 yards for his career and Nagurski was at about 2,700. Now Green Bay's Jim Taylor could make a case: 1,474 yards and 19 TDs in 1962. Not bad. I apologize to all for making so many comments - I can't help it. I just love conversations like this. Crackajg - again, nice job. Very thought provoking.
Permalink
CheezerAll-Star
564 days ago
Score 3+-
I did the same thing SJ.

My comment is why don't the numbers support them? What makes the modern era running back so much better?

For consideration:
*Longer seasons
Better weight training, etc.
*Year long training techniques
*Better supplements
*Looser passing rules open the field.

Anything else?
Permalink
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
564 days ago
Score 2+-
I am with you - I don't necessarily think that the modern back is better...I just meant that when you say 12,000 yards or 16,000 yards, 3,000 doesn't sound like so much. Perhaps this is a cop-out - I was just looking at it from a pure number perspective. It's just a different game now. But I agree totally that there needs to be a way to recognize the older players for their accomplishments. There's a reason these names are part of the die-hard football fan's vocabulary. I think that as long as old farts like me bring the names up from time to time, their names will remain relevant.
Permalink
CrackajgDraft Pick
564 days ago
Score 2+-
I shall get researching for the next article in this series: Best Running Backs Before 1980... or something like that. What year do you guys think should be the cutoff point?
Permalink
CheezerAll-Star
564 days ago
Score 0+-
Further research. Check this page. Look at the increase in yardage numbers starting basically with Jim Brown.

It looks like carries shows a similar change at about the same time. Maybe there was a philosophy change starting about the Steve Van Buren era that switched from platooning to a featured back.
Permalink
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
564 days ago
Score 0+-
Well...I wouldn't want to be heavy handed...but since you asked...I think the 70s are represented pretty well in this list. Perhaps best RBs from 1920-1960? That's about the same timeframe as this list - esentially 1970-2008 (with the exception of Jim Brown, of course). That could be very interesting indeed.
Permalink
CheezerAll-Star
564 days ago
Score 0+-
I don't mind being heavy handed :-) Especially since you asked. In 1978, the NFL changed the passing rules to make pass interference more strict. This opened up the passing game and consequently made defense adjust by putting more people in coverage. This led to fewer men in the box and improved rushing numbers. (That's my theory and I'm sticking to it.)

You may want to use that as the dividing line. Other than that, maybe you can find something on rules changes or season length that you may want to use as the dividing line.

If you use 1980, I think you'll find that your top backs still include Brown (of course). But also Harris, Campbell and OJ Simpson (maybe Payton) from the 70's (that's 4/10). It will probably add Steve Van Buren and maybe Jim Taylor and Gale Sayers. Maybe Leroy Kelly.

Hard telling where to draw the line. Good luck.
Permalink
False ProphetAll-Star
564 days ago
Score 3+-
Look at this list, it will tell you something that no one in football wants to hear. A great RB almost always is between the tackles type of runner.

There are 4 speed backs (Faulk, Sanders, Allen, and Simpson), and the 2 that were truly flashy, outside runners and pass catchers (Faulk and Allen) were both able to run between the tackles when they needed to.

Harris, Bettis, Martin, Thomas, Payton, Riggins, and Brown all fit the "boring", between the tackles type of runner without a lot of speed, but a lot of strength.

Tomlinson, Dickerson, and Smith are hybrids, but they all fit more within the power back mold than the flashy mold. Smith and Tomlinson especially have/had speed, but they use it to get through the second level. 10 out of the 14 backs listed are more between the tackles rbs.

This is why Reggie Bush should have been forseen as a bust, and Addai/Maroney/MJD, who all are more traditional runners, including MJD (who runs outside and inside) have had better careers this far, and have a brighter future in terms of their potential.
Permalink | Reply
Steel TownDraft Pick
564 days ago
Score 2+-
And this is why Rashard Mendenhall will be better than Run DMC.


Note: feel free to ignore this statement as it was clearly made out of a "homer bias".
Permalink
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
564 days ago
Score 3+-
I'm okay with hearing that. It's true. If you can't kill the clock, it's going to be tougher to close out the close games. New England was able to run an offense that countered the RB-focused mentality...but that is a pretty rare way for a team to go. More often than not, you need a power RB. I was wondering what other people thought of Bush. I thought he was overhyped and therefore could never be as good as his press would have us believe. Might be a bit early to truly call him a bust...but he'll never be able to match the hype.
Permalink
False ProphetAll-Star
564 days ago
Score 2+-
the pats have a power RB in Maroney. The issue for a lot of the year was Morris was out of commission, and Maroney was still not that healthy. They were a pass focused team, but they could but the ball on the ground late in the season when they needed to. Bush will be a bust. He will never be a RB that you can start on his own. Without a complementary power back, he's not very good.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
564 days ago
Score 0+-
Anyone remember me calling Bush a glorified Brian Westbrook... Yes, you can all admire me now...
Permalink
False ProphetAll-Star
564 days ago
Score 0+-
Only BigPPup and KD were here during that draft Justin
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #2
564 days ago
Score 0+-
Personally, I think a back who averages over 1500 yards a year for his entire career is the winner. No one is within 200 yards of him except Jim Brown. And this is from a forever Bills fan who thinks Thurman Thomas did everything except walk on water. (Fun fact...Thurman Thomas was the starter at Oklahoma State when Barry Sanders was there. Thurman Thomas kept Barry Sanders on the bench for 2 years until he graduated.) People can say what they want. Barry's the best. I think your article is awesome thouugh just for the sheer fact that it takes you back down memory lane. Good writing.
Permalink | Reply
Jacjj5JV Squad
564 days ago
Score 2+-
Sorry. Didn't know I wasn't logged in when I wrote earlier. Personally, I think a back who averages over 1500 yards a year for his entire career is the winner. No one is within 200 yards of him except Jim Brown. And this is from a forever Bills fan who thinks Thurman Thomas did everything except walk on water. (Fun fact...Thurman Thomas was the starter at Oklahoma State when Barry Sanders was there. Thurman Thomas kept Barry Sanders on the bench for 2 years until he graduated.) People can say what they want. Barry's the best. I think your article is awesome thouugh just for the sheer fact that it takes you back down memory lane. Good writing.
Permalink | Reply
Jacjj5JV Squad
564 days ago
Score 0+-
Another thing. Barry also average 99.79 rushing yards every game he played. Some say math isn't everything, but....
Permalink | Reply
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
564 days ago
Score 2+-

[edit] MARION MOTLEY!!!!

Permalink | Reply
Davis21wylieMVP
564 days ago
Score 2+-
Best big back ever.
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
564 days ago
Score 2+-
They changed a lot of rules because of him.
Permalink
ShrubberyVarsity Captain
564 days ago
Score 3+-
Nice call!
Permalink
T RozJV Squad
564 days ago
Score 4+-
OJ as only an honorable mention is surprising. 2003 yards in 14 games, with 6 yards per carry, and for a Buffalo team that was so horrible he was doing this against 8 in the box every play. Gale Sayers is also missing, unless longevity was a part of the criteria.
Permalink | Reply
False ProphetAll-Star
564 days ago
Score 2+-
Sanders is the objective best back. Personally, if I were constructing a team though, I would take Faulk as my RB. The possibilities he opens up would make me giddy as a coach.
Permalink | Reply
Pwinter713Varsity
564 days ago
Score 6+-
OJ was asked to compile a list of the best waiters in LA....he said he'd take a stab at it.
Permalink | Reply
ShrubberyVarsity Captain
564 days ago
Score 1+-
The only RB's in NFL history to average 5+ yards per carry and 95+ yards per game...Jim Brown and Barry Sanders. They are #1 & 1a and in my opinion the drop off to #2 is steeper than most people think. Brown & Sanders are among the best ever at any position, right up there with Butkus, Lawrence Taylor, Jerry Rice, Reggie White, Deacon Jones, Anthony Munoz, Joe Montana, Elway, Unitas, Ronnie Lott. It would be difficult to say anyone else on this RB list is as good at what they did as the true deities of their positions. I take HUGE issue with putting Bettis on this list and leaving out Marcus Allen, Curtis Martin, Edgerin James, Roger Craig, or putting Thurman Thomas in the "other notable".
Permalink | Reply
ShrubberyVarsity Captain
564 days ago
Score 0+-
Oops, saw Curtis Martin & Marcus Allen up there...my apologies.
Permalink
ShrubberyVarsity Captain
564 days ago
Score 0+-
But once again, where are Roger Craig, Edgerin James, or even Terrell Davis, Sean Alexander, Tiki Barber, or the mercurial Bo Jackson.
Permalink
Steel TownDraft Pick
564 days ago
Score 0+-
Do any of those guys have as many yards or touchdowns as Bettis? Seriously, Davis, Barber and Jackson? There careers were to short for someone not named Barry. Alexander doesn't look like he is in it for the long haul and edge couldn't do it outside of Indy.
Permalink
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
564 days ago
Score 0+-
Why would anyone take exception to Bettis being on this list? Bettis was a top 5 back for 10 years. Unfortunately for them, Davis and Jackson are simply great backs (a la Billy Sims and Joe Cribbs) who had exciting, and potentially great, but short careers. Too short for a list like this. If Jackson should be on the list, why not Barry Word or Ickey Woods??
Permalink
ShrubberyVarsity Captain
564 days ago
Score 0+-
Davis had a better four year run than all but four RB's in NFL history and set a record with seven straight 100+ yard post season games, Jackson averaged 5.5 yards per carry, and Alexander has a 4.3 yds/carry career average compared to 3.9 for Bettis. Bettis' numbers aree a function of longevity, not dominance.
Permalink
ShrubberyVarsity Captain
564 days ago
Score 0+-
Gale Sayers only had a functional career of four years like Davis & Jackson but he's on the list.
Permalink
ShrubberyVarsity Captain
564 days ago
Score -1+-
Plus Davis was named to the NFL 1990's All Decade Team along side Emmitt Smitth, Barry Sanders, and Thurman Thomas. Where was Bettis...oh that's right, no where.
Permalink
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
564 days ago
Score 2+-
Where was Bettis? Writing his HOF acceptance speech.
Permalink
ShrubberyVarsity Captain
564 days ago
Score 0+-
He ain't in yet and if he gets in I'll still contend he was functonally not better than either Davis, Jackson, Edgerin, or Alexander.
Permalink
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
564 days ago
Score 2+-
We'll have to agree to disagree then. I think he's better than all of them. And a shoo-in for HOF induction. And I don't mean to disrespect these backs - or to dis Cribbs, Sims or Word for that matter. This is a list of all-time backs...not "backs that were good for 4-5 years"
Permalink
KelsdadAll-Star
564 days ago
Score 2+-
After reading through the list, then seeing everyone's suggestions, I can go back and take out a few guys, specifically Riggins and Tomlinson (only because he's still active).

Sayers had a short career. So did Chuck Foreman. Floyd Little played most of his career in the AFL.

It's all apples and oranges, and has made for a great debate.

And for the four and a half years he played, Sayers was the best.
Permalink
ShrubberyVarsity Captain
564 days ago
Score -1+-
Which is why it's borderline criminal not include Edgerin James, Roger Craig, or Shaun Alexander on this list. I'll cede the point, albeit reluctantly, about Davis & Jackson. But Edge & Alexander will make it into the Hall too, if there's any justice or cognitive thought left on the voting panel.
Permalink
ShrubberyVarsity Captain
564 days ago
Score 0+-
I have quite a few friends who've been floyd Little fans for years. He's been called by a few old schoolers the first Barry Sanders, only faster. Had Little played for a decent team on the east coast he would've been in Canton a long time ago.
Permalink
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
564 days ago
Score 0+-
If I am remembering this correctly, Floyd Little is the answer to a good trivia question. What running back was the last to lead his conference in rushing - in a non-strike year - with less than 1,000 yards? I think this is correct...
Permalink
ShrubberyVarsity Captain
564 days ago
Score 2+-
Don't forget about Paul Hornung, Jim Taylor, Larry Czonka, and as Manny said, Marion Motley.
Permalink | Reply
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
564 days ago
Score 0+-
Paul Hornung and Jim Taylor were mentioned in an earlier set of comments. Czonka? Can't second that. Three seasons over 1,000 yards and 64 career TDs? Very good numbers from a very good back. One of the all-time best?
Permalink
ShrubberyVarsity Captain
564 days ago
Score 0+-
Czonka was the best pure FB ever but I see your point. Even Davis had 60+ rushing TDs.
Permalink
The oldest manVarsity
564 days ago
Score 5+-
JIM BROWN are the only two words you need to read. Eric D. was one of the most dangerous to ever carry the ball. Stats will tell you Sanders but Brown did things running I have never seen until Eric came out of SMU. Brown could and did go over you, though you and around you and Eric could do the same and was faster than Brown. All these running backs are great and different but for a money back when the game was on the line and you needed to get it into the endzone give it to Jim Brown or Eric Dickerson and the job will get done. You could stop the others but these two were about near impossible to stop as anyone to ever carry the horsehide. With one exception being someone very few of you have ever heard of that one indivdual was truly the greatest player of them all and he could and did it all JIM THORPE. Look up some of his stats and if he had been born 15 later some of the records would still be standing today.
Permalink | Reply
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
564 days ago
Score 0+-
Believe it or not, Thorpe was mentioned earlier in the comments. I'm afraid his official stats don't say much, but his legend is indisputable. He was voted the best athlete of the first half of the 20th century and he won the 1912 decathalon. That's enough in my mind for him to be mentioned here.
Permalink
Yakob878MVP
564 days ago
Score 2+-
sayers over martin
Permalink | Reply
Ccampbell34All-American
564 days ago
Score 1+-
Fred Taylor is going to finish his career in the top 15 all time rushers but will never be mentioned in this debate let alone a pro bowl spot. Kind of funny how that works.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #3
564 days ago
Score 1+-
Brown was around just before I could see him, but ask the old-timers, he was the best. He was actually a modern athlete with strength and speed beyond many of the posers on this list. Given the weight training, etc. he'd be far better than anyone on the list, including Sanders, who'd resemble his baby brother. Leaving Simpson off the list must be due to the fact that he's a miserable human, because he was the second best to ever carry the ball. He had sprinter's speed(on a 4x100 meter record team), elusiveness, acceleration and power. His contemporaries on this list would consider it laughable that they are rated his equal or superior on any ranking list.1st team all-pro 1972-1976, NFL player of the year 1972,1973, and 1975.
Permalink | Reply
Rough Hog 68JV Squad
564 days ago
Score 1+-
1. Jim Brown

2. Walter Payton

3. Earl Campbell
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #4
563 days ago
Score 0+-
Curtis Martin is probally one of the most under-rated players in football. He was never shown any respect by anyone yet he was one of the greatest of all-time.
Permalink | Reply
Smmonroe2Varsity Captain
563 days ago
Score 0+-
Great picks, i agree with all of them
Permalink | Reply
Wojcicki00Varsity
563 days ago
Score 0+-
Very good article...I would add Westbrook to the list of honorable mention as well. He's always putting up fantastic numbers, can run well, and catch well too. i have no idea though how he stands career number wise
Permalink | Reply
Xman2008Varsity
563 days ago
Score 0+-
Excellent article. Can't disagree with any of the top picks, esp since you took pains to not rank them, just list them.

I have a soft spot in my heart for Roger Craig, but if I look at this objectively, his career was not quite that long, and not quite that productive overall.
BUT...
any guy who can slice his arm open, have it stitched up on the sidelines (on camera, no less), then go back out there and play, they're okay in my book.

I met Walter Payton on a flight from Chicago to Seattle once. Kind of a smallish guy (this was in his later years, so his illness may have had something to do with it), but what I remember most was that he was in first class, but spent most of the time back in coach, just walking the aisles and chatting with the folks back there, just like it was no big deal. Classy, very classy.
Permalink | Reply
OvertheedgeVarsity
562 days ago
Score 3+-
barry sanders is number one
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #5
562 days ago
Score 0+-
I'm not making the case for him as the best of all time, but I find it amazing how underrated Emmitt Smith is at times. I know he was surrounded by talent, but people act like using your blockers and having great vision and patience aren't great traits that are NOT possessed by all running backs. One need merely watch Larry Johnson of the Kansas City Chiefs to see athletic talent wasted by horrible field vision and an inability to maximize use of blockers. Emmitt Smith may not have had all the physical tools of these other backs, but I'd say that his mental approach to the game is hard to match. He was also a lot stronger than people remember, if you go back and watch his tackle-breaking runs.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #6
562 days ago
Score 3+-
In the "what might have been" category: Bo Jackson.
Permalink | Reply
SbianchiSoccer Kid
561 days ago
Score 0+-
Great List!!!! Nice work
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #7
512 days ago
Score 0+-
lets go jags
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #7
512 days ago
Score 0+-
DAVID GARRARD RULZ
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #8
321 days ago
Score 0+-
were is gale sayers
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #9
310 days ago
Score 0+-
no disrespect to barry sanders, one of the most electrifying backs in history, but he could not hold jimmy brown jock strap. if you look at what jim brown has done in his career, in a short career(9 seasons), its unbelievable. he set the standard for so many years that so many backs tried to get and fell short and alot of those backs were better than barry was. they all fell short until the great walter payton, may he rest in peace.
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free
Categories: Opinions | Opinions by User Crackajg | May 13, 2008 | May 2008 | NFL Opinions | History of the NFL Opinions | Running backs Opinions | Sport Crack Opinions | Crackajg Opinions

Don't Miss

Phillies World Series 2009: A Year Later, and They Still Don't Want Us
Sorry, But I'm Not Sorry
2009 NHL Preview
In Which Ricketts Wins World Series
2009 Week 3: Let’s Talk About Your Favorite NFL Team

In the News

Hey ArmchairGM users! Want to help the admins update this news section? Click here to help us out.

Comments of the Day

0 LaDanian Tomlinson (check the QB rating)
0 Only because the voters are facking stupid. "Numbers" are...

Take a Poll

Who were the greatest righthanders and lefthanders strike out pitchers in the Major Leagues.
Ryan/Koufax R Johnson/Ryan Ryan/W Johnson Steve C/W Johnson

New Articles

How Can Fred McGriff Not Be Elected to the Hall of Fame?
Best African-American Quarterback Ever?
Ken Caminiti: National League's 1996 MVP
Winter Olympics 2010
Highlights from Dubai 7's

Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Article:NFL_History_101:_Top_Running_Backs"

This page was last modified 18:39, 13 May 2008. Content is available under the GFDL.

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise