armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan

About the Author

Crackajg
The Resume

More By Crackajg

Fantasy Football 2009's Comatose Sleepers
13 votes, 7 comments
The Freudian Fumble Quiz: What Kind of Fantasy Football Personality Do You Have?
17 votes, 11 comments
Seventh Heaven: The Top Seven Fantasy Rookie Running Backs of 2009
5 votes, 0 comments
View All

Other recent voters

If you like the article, vote for it.
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

NFL Draft Positional Breakdown: Running backs

by Crackajg
created April 23, 2008, last edited June 03, 2008
13
Vote

Yes, that’s right, it’s yet another NFL Draft article from yours truly. But since we’re less than a week away from the actual thing and with the AGM Mock Draft going on as we speak, I figured it would be okay.

Like last time, the following rankings are not the order I think that they players will be drafted, but rather how successful an NFL career they will have and how talented they are. Up today, it’s everyone’s favorite skill position: Running backs!


1. Darren McFadden

No surprises here, McFadden is number one and rightfully so. He’s one of the most hyped backs to come out of college since Reggie Bush and he’s been compared multiple times to Adrian Peterson because of his strong running style that is complimented by speed. Can we just completely stop comparing players coming out of college to pro players? They are each their own person with their own skill sets -- and comparing them to people before they’ve even played on the pro level has never made much sense to me. After they’ve played a couple of pro games? Fine, but until then, let’s just say Darren McFadden is the most similar to Darren McFadden.

2007 stats: 304 rushes for 1,725 yards, 15 TD’s, 21 receptions for 164 yards, 1 TD


2. Jonathan Stewart

There are some people who have been saying that Jonathan Stewart is going to be better than Darren McFadden. While this may be true, I think these people are just trying to create controversy. Unlike the differing opinions on the Brohm/Ryan duo, there really isn’t much solid evidence to back up that Stewart will be better than McFadden other than the fact that he had similar stats last year. But then again, Stewart ran for Oregon -- McFadden for Arkansas in the uber-competitive SEC.

2007 stats: 280 rushes for 1,722 yards, 11 TD’s, 22 receptions for 145 yards, 2 TD’s


3. Rashard Mendenhall

With all the McFadden/Peterson comparisons, I’m surprised than more people are not comparing Rashard Mendenhall to Adrian Peterson as well. He has the same combo of power and speed that makes people salivate over him and he has great hands out of the backfield. As with everything, we will have to wait and see.

2007 stats: 262 rushes for 1,681 yards, 17 TD’s, 34 receptions for 318 yards, 2 TD’s


4. Ray Rice

Breaking 2,000 yards in a season is no small feat -- but having almost 400 rushes certainly helps. Ray Rice was the focal point of the Rutgers offense last year and it shows in his statistics. Rice could have been a great pick last year if he came out and he only improved his game this year. The one thing all of those carries does tell us about Rice is that he can be the workhouse starting running back many current teams so desperately need.

2007 stats: 380 attempts for 2,012 yards, 24 TD’s, 25 receptions for 239 yards, 1 TD


5. Felix Jones

Had Jones not started behind Darren McFadden the whole season and instead was the starter for a different team, he very well could have been the second or even first running back taken. A lot of people are excited about Jones’ potential and with good reason -- with barely 130 carries he made every carry worthwhile, averaging 8.7 yards per rush.

2007 stats: 133 rushes for 1,162 yards, 11 TD’s, 16 receptions for 176 yards


Honorable mentions: Steve Slaton, Chris Johnson, Kevin Smith, Mike Hart


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
Behbigben15All-Star
584 days ago
Score 3+-
Nice list, I hope McFadden goes on to have a nice NFL career, I'll be rooting for him.
Permalink | Reply
Yakob878MVP
584 days ago
Score 1+-
same here as long as he stays out of the afc east meaning if he was not drafted by the pats
Permalink | Reply
CrackajgDraft Pick
584 days ago
Score 1+-
He'll go to the Raiders, don't worry. Then again, it's the NFL Draft so you never know -- I'd rather have the Jets get McFadden than Gholston, personally.
Permalink
KelsdadAll-Star
584 days ago
Score 2+-
If both Chris Long and McFadden are still on the board at #5, I think the Raiders take Long, which leaves McFadden to the Jets, Jets, Jets....
Image:jetslogo.jpg This user is a New York Jets fan.
Permalink | Reply
DrpatriotAll-American
583 days ago
Score 0+-
The Raiders pick at #4, not #5.
Permalink
Yakob878MVP
584 days ago
Score 1+-
a nice compliment to Thomas Jones there. You know what pisses me off more than all of these nfl draft articles is two potenial top five players have the same last name in long. I always have to stop and think about whitch one ios witch
Permalink | Reply
CrackajgDraft Pick
584 days ago
Score 2+-
Which Long will have the longer career? I'm going to go with Long.
Permalink
Yakob878MVP
584 days ago
Score 1+-
good question
Permalink | Reply
IbeargRed-Shirting
584 days ago
Score 3+-
you mention Ray Rice as a workhorse back... i wonder if NFL coaches/franchises are going to start to figure out that running backs shouldn't carry the ball 350-400+ times in a season if they want their investments to be worth something in the future. (kinda like in baseball they figured out pitchers shouldn't pitch more then 30 extra innings in a year then the previous year) I also wonder why Felix Jones chose to leave when he could have uped his stock significantly by being a feature back this year... i guess the coaching change probably had something to do with it, but he probably cost himself some money.
Permalink | Reply
CrackajgDraft Pick
584 days ago
Score 1+-
Agreed and agreed. With the NFL's move towards more two back sets, the little backs like Rice and Jones are a lot more valuable than they once were as well.
Permalink
Simms1156Div-I Stud
584 days ago
Score 2+-
I cant really complain about the list but I personally would have put Mendenhall ahead of Stewart because I think he has the better NFL potential. I also think that in honorable mention should be Michael Hart, he is the type of guy who will be a good NFL back, hes not going to wow anybody but he will be consistent and wont put the ball on the ground which is very important.
Permalink | Reply
CrackajgDraft Pick
583 days ago
Score 0+-
Great points. Added Mike Hart to the honorable mentions.
Permalink
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free
Categories: New York Jets fans | Opinions | Opinions by User Crackajg | April 23, 2008 | April 2008 | NFL Opinions | NFL Draft Opinions | NCAA Football Opinions | Running backs Opinions

Don't Miss

Phillies World Series 2009: A Year Later, and They Still Don't Want Us
Sorry, But I'm Not Sorry
2009 NHL Preview
In Which Ricketts Wins World Series
2009 Week 3: Let’s Talk About Your Favorite NFL Team

In the News

Hey ArmchairGM users! Want to help the admins update this news section? Click here to help us out.

Comments of the Day

0 LaDanian Tomlinson (check the QB rating)
0 Only because the voters are facking stupid. "Numbers" are...

Play the Picture Game

Best HR Robbing Catch

New Articles

How Can Fred McGriff Not Be Elected to the Hall of Fame?
Best African-American Quarterback Ever?
Ken Caminiti: National League's 1996 MVP
Winter Olympics 2010
Highlights from Dubai 7's

Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Article:NFL_Draft_Positional_Breakdown:_Running_backs"

This page was last modified 14:24, 24 April 2008. Content is available under the GFDL.

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise