armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan

About the Author

AmphibiousSportsDuo

More By AmphibiousSportsDuo

NFL Week 4: The Numbers
4 votes, 0 comments
Who are these Carolina Panthers?
10 votes, 5 comments
Black QBs in the NFL: An Assessment
17 votes, 40 comments
View All

Other recent voters

If you like the article, vote for it.
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Man with Ascot causes BCS shakeup

by AmphibiousSportsDuo
created September 26, 2008, last edited February 10, 2009
11
Vote

Oregon State safety Greg Laybourn's late interception of USC QB Mark Sanchez led to the Beavers lone 2nd-half score, but it was enough to hold off the consensus number one. Laybourn, who appeared to be wearing an ascot picked off the pass at the USC 30 and ran the ball down to the two yard-line. Oregon State scored on the next play to make the score 27-14 and following a quick USC TD drive, the Beavers recovered the onside kick and secured victory.

The original title for this post, was going to be, "Man in Ascot Deals Death Blow to USC's National Championship Hopes," but the Trojans are not done. With eight of the current top ten teams calling either the SEC or the Big XII home, there's a real possibility of all of them ending up with at least one loss. USC's schedule had already come under fire (a discussion for another day), but if all of the top teams lose, USC could be right back in the mix.

First things first, if a school from the SEC goes undefeated, they're in the big game. Same goes for any team from the Big XII. If a Big Ten school goes undefeated, they will be in, unless there are undefeated teams from both the SEC and the Big XII, in which case they'll be bridesmaids (sound familiar Penn State fans?). If any of these scenarios play out, USC will be stuck once again in a bowl they feel they're better than.

If the SEC champion has only one loss, they're in, unless the BIG conferences each feature an undefeated team. If the Big XII champion has only one loss, they will be in, if there are no undefeated teams, or the SEC champion is the only undefeated team. If either Big Ten team loses only one game, they will have to hope that every team has two losses, because none of them will get the nod over USC.

USC's best hope for another shot at the championship lies, ironically in games they've never had to play, conference championship games. If a two loss team can knock off either an undefeated team or a one loss team, USC may be able to creep back into the picture. Even if there are other one loss teams, but they do not play for the conference title (think Auburn), USC stands a chance. With USC still likely to win the conference, voters will justify that a conference winner carries more weight than a team that couldn't even win their division.

One interesting scenario that could play out, would be Ohio State running the table, and finishing with only one loss. This would assume that they would beat both Wisconsin, Illinois, and Penn State. Three quality wins versus one for USC. As much as it pains me, there is no way the voters would put Ohio State into the National Championship. The only match-up that would appeal to me as a Buckeye fan would be a rematch with the Trojans. Would a full-time Terelle Pryor and Beanie Wells make a difference? Based on Jacquizz Rodgers performance, a good running back could go a long way (/slight case of denial).

Regardless of what happens over the next few months, the Trojans are relegated to scoreboard watching and trying to get up for each game hoping for a second chance. As it stands now, potentially the best team in the nation stands on the outside looking in, and if at the end of the year, their ring fingers remain bare, it'll be due to their inability to get excited for a game against a conference opponent on national TV, a 5'6" 180-pound freshman running back, and a man with an ascot.


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
410 days ago
Score 4+-
What are you? The haberdashery police? Are you sure it wasn't a cravat or a jabot?
Permalink | Reply
Oh No RomoDraft Pick
409 days ago
Score 2+-
This is no time to be talking about Monty Python.
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
409 days ago
Score 1+-
who?
Permalink
Behbigben15All-Star
409 days ago
Score 0+-
How about some visual evidence??
Permalink | Reply
AmphibiousSportsDuoVarsity
409 days ago
Score 0+-
[| This picture isn't great, but you can see the side.]
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
409 days ago
Score 3+-
If any of these scenarios play out, USC will be stuck once again in a bowl they feel they're better than.

I love that quote (quotation for the British douche around here ; - ))

Anyway, its true...but, if its so true, then why don't they just win all their games, like a potential compadre from the SEC or Big XII? I'm sorry, but if you can't win out in a conference against the likes of Oregon State, a weakened Cal and rebuilding UCLA, what makes you think you can contend with the Best of LSU, Georgia or Florida?

talk about entitlement...
Permalink | Reply
AmphibiousSportsDuoVarsity
409 days ago
Score 0+-
are you mocking my 2 AM grammar?
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
409 days ago
Score 0+-
The thing is, when USC does play those kinds of teams, they typically do well. They've had trouble executing in "easy" games that they seemingly don't take too seriously until it's too late.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
409 days ago
Score 1+-
Which to me is a sign that their so-called "coach" sucks.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
409 days ago
Score 0+-
One thing USC has going for them is that this is an early loss. They'll feel the pain in the polls on Sunday, and might even drop out of the top 10. But they'll move up a spot every time another top team falls (and they all will lose a game).


The polls move teams down too much when they lose, and move them up too easily as others lose. In other words, the poll voters have very short memories.
Permalink | Reply
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
409 days ago
Score 0+-
move teams down too FAR when they lose^
Permalink
AmphibiousSportsDuoVarsity
409 days ago
Score 0+-
I wouldn't expect them to fall below Texas Tech, who has a bye this week. With another top ten team guaranteed a loss this weekend, I can't imagine them dropping out of the top ten. It's not like they're Ohio State after all.
Permalink
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free
Categories: Opinions | Opinions by User AmphibiousSportsDuo | September 26, 2008 | September 2008 | College Football Opinions | BCS Opinions | USC Opinions

Don't Miss

Phillies World Series 2009: A Year Later, and They Still Don't Want Us
Sorry, But I'm Not Sorry
2009 NHL Preview
In Which Ricketts Wins World Series
2009 Week 3: Let’s Talk About Your Favorite NFL Team

In the News

The Boston Celtics defeated the New Jersey Nets, 86-76 on Saturday. The Nets are now 0-7 - their worst start in franchise history.

Play the Picture Game

Better Tongue

New Articles

Bad Flashbacks: An Analsis of USC v ASU
What If Brad Lidge Had Started Game One?
Week 9 Postgame: Trick or Treat?
Dear FIFA, UEFA, & Football Fans... It is time.
Make it Number 27

Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Article:Man_with_Ascot_causes_BCS_shakeup"

This page was last modified 06:56, 26 September 2008. Content is available under the GFDL.

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise