armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan

About the Author

Crackajg
The Resume

More By Crackajg

Fantasy Football 2009's Comatose Sleepers
13 votes, 7 comments
The Freudian Fumble Quiz: What Kind of Fantasy Football Personality Do You Have?
17 votes, 11 comments
Seventh Heaven: The Top Seven Fantasy Rookie Running Backs of 2009
5 votes, 0 comments
View All

Other recent voters

If you like the article, vote for it.
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

ImmersedFan GM: Could a fan run franchise really work?

by Crackajg
created March 19, 2008, last edited February 10, 2009
21
Vote

If you’ve ever been to a bar or public place during a thrilling sports event, you know the atmosphere. It is sports fandom at it’s purest. Whether it’s complete strangers, common acquaintances or best friends -- there’s nothing like sharing a great sporting moment with those who love a team as much as you do. It is an unspeakable connection that not many things can even begin to touch. It has made grown men and self professed toughs hug and giggle like little school girls. It can bring down race, gender and difference barriers so effortlessly it sometimes makes us wonder why we think we’re all so different in the first place.

It’s impossible to explain to someone who’s never really come to love a sports team what it’s really like or what being a true fan is really about. Fans live and die with their teams -- their attitude often fluctuating on the recent wins and losses that they acquire or the anguish that is felt when their team falls just short of a championship. Some fans anguish is more extreme than others, obviously, but at it’s most basic form and to the average fan -- the extremes of winning big and losing bad are easily recalled.

From the moment sports were born they were a catalyst for the everyman to become a fan, and doing so had many advantages. Whether it was to take their mind off the real world, to feed their need for competition, plain old enjoyment or a combination of the bunch -- no matter what, it became a part of life itself. Your hometown baseball team’s fate had as much say about your daily mood than the inner workings of your automobile. So what if your car broke down in the rain, the Sox just won a key series against the Yanks in September. It isn’t just a thing to watch on T.V. or an excuse to throw back beers on weeknights -- it’s a part of your life.

That’s it. If you understand, you understand and if you don’t, you don’t.

Why the idea of a fan led franchise hasn’t been thought up before in America is beyond me. I’ve honestly, never even thought of it. But if you take a minute and think of it, it’s a brilliant idea. Who better to run a professional sports team than those who live and die with their every move? Why not put the fate of a franchise into it’s fans hands so they have only their selves to blame if they mess it up?

Most GM’s (while not all, mind you) have finance in mind when running a team. Sure they might be a fair-weather fan, but since when have you seen a hardcore fan of a particular team become the GM? Sure, Marc Cuban comes to mind -- but other than that, I got no one. Does that mean that they don’t exist? Absolutely not. Does it mean we need some? Absolutely yes.

Someone who runs a particular team should have more than just dumping salary or selling tickets in mind when trading, drafting or signing players. They should worry less about how the local fans will react to the team’s moves and more about how their moves will effect their own life. If the fans run the team, only the most logical and best-for-the-team moves will be made.

Again, if those moves don’t work -- they will have no one to blame but themselves. No more FireCoachSoandSo dot com‘s, no more excuses, no more blame. How could this not be good for sports? With all the things happening in regards to steroid scandals and spying cases, how could a logical step backward, to a simpler time be so bad? Even if it doesn’t work at first, why shouldn’t those who pay the taxes for a particular team, overpay to see them live and even buy papers and magazines to read about them not have a say in how they’re run?



Over the years money has become more important in sports than the actual outcomes of games. Players care more about their signing bonus than they’re own record. Not a contract year? Time to relax. Money talks, and we all know this -- but it’s now the focal point of the conversation for a thing that was once just all about competition. It was all about winning. It was all about your team winning the title and that was that. What would true fans choose between: the basketball arena grossing an extra 4 million or the basketball team adding a championship banner to the said arena. I think you know the answer.

Even if you disagree with this whole thing, please, just do me a favor. Stop and think about something for me. Stop and think about why you watch sports in the first place, why you love your favorite teams, why you would jump for joy if someone told you they had 50 yard line tickets to the next local pro football game. Literally, jump up and down for joy. What harm could it do to let the people who are so emotionally involved in a team that a loss can make a normally horrible Monday morning absolutely abysmal, run the show?

If you’ve agreed with this piece and you think it would be a good idea for fans to run what they love, head over to Project Franchise -- and before you start to make judgements, I thought to do this article all by my lonesome after reading about the whole thing on their website. It’s not a shameless whore like plug by them and more of a shameless whore like plug by me -- who's not affiliated with them in any way. So if you’ve ever thought you could do better and believe that the blue collared fan would fare better than the current money hungry GM’s -- do yourself a favor and head over to the Project Franchise site and read what it’s all about. Hell, you may even be a part of a revolution.


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
Cougar2000All-American
621 days ago
Score 4+-
It actually does work. There's this little football team in Wisconsin called the Green Bay Packers, which is owned by the entire city of Green Bay. Your idea does carry some major merit, however.
Permalink | Reply
KelsdadAll-Star
621 days ago
Score -2+-
Nope
Permalink | Reply
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
621 days ago
Score 1+-
For fack's sake minus troll, if you disagree with a comment at least show some balls and comment WHY.
Permalink
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
621 days ago
Score 0+-
LOL - that was to the anon who minused Kelsdad and NOT Kelsdad. Put down the knife.... Put down the knife....
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
621 days ago
Score 2+-
why? If a user can't put thought into a comment, why should another?
Permalink
DeutscherRed-Shirting
621 days ago
Score 0+-
At one point in time every single team in the CFL was a community owned team, most still are. The board of governers made up of people from the community, they hire and fire the GMs and whoever. That is great, Stupid asshole fans callling the shots is stupid. Not a chance.
Permalink | Reply
Oh No RomoDraft Pick
621 days ago
Score 2+-
A franchise is a big responsibility. You have to feed it everyday, clean it and pick up its crap in the yard. Are you sure you're up for that?
Permalink | Reply
CrackajgDraft Pick
620 days ago
Score 0+-
Let's see how I do with my baby that's coming in a week or so -- if I can feed her, clean up after her and clean up the crap in the diaper, I should have a pretty good shot at doing the same for a professional franchise. :P
Permalink
IbeargRed-Shirting
621 days ago
Score 1+-
i could be wrong but the idea of project franchise is to actually buy a team... when you buy a team you can make whatever decisions you want. If you don't care about making that extra money then fine who cares you own the team. If you're only GM however you have an owner to answer to. He pays the players so if he wants to recoup those expenses well sucks for the fans, but that's his choice. So if the fans want to own and run the team it could possibly work, there'll still be vast disagreement between what should be done and certain fans will still not be made. Trading will also be harder as an opposing gm is not going to want to propose a trade to the masses of owners of a potential team as it will not be hard for the player on his team he's offering in the trade to find out about the offer.
Permalink | Reply
IbeargRed-Shirting
621 days ago
Score 0+-
certain fans will still not be happy*
Permalink | Reply
ProjectFranchise.OrgWaterboy
621 days ago
Score 0+-
Our thought is that sports have been run the same way since the beginning, with fans being told to sit down (in your $125 seat) and leave the decisions to the professionals. (Matt Millen, Isiah Thomas, etc.) Why not try something new, with a minor league club, all anyone has to lose is $5. That's probably less than 1% of what we each spend on one of our favorite teams, and they don't care what we say...Thanks for the support CrackaJG. For more detailed info about what ProjectFranchise.org is all about read, http://www.a...ct_Franchise
Permalink | Reply
Ccampbell34All-American
620 days ago
Score 1+-
The Schamburg Flyers, flyersbaseball.com, tried this and it didnt work, they went from best team in league while being run by management to worst team in second half while being run by fans
Permalink
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
621 days ago
Score 1+-
Die hard fans >>>> James Dolan
Permalink | Reply
J-DawgVarsity Captain
620 days ago
Score 1+-
I disagree with fans calling all the shots, but this article does have some valid points. I think sports teams should be run like a business; have one main CEO(GM) and have all the stockholders(fans). This way the GM can make all the moves, but if he makes an especially stupid one, the fans can overrule him. I think that this would give fans an extra sense of pride knowing that they helped contribute to their teams success(or in the case of the Toronto Maple Leafs...failure)
Permalink | Reply
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
620 days ago
Score 0+-
Uhhh, so how "stupid" does a "move" have to be in order for a GM to be vetoed? Congress should be taking notes here.
Permalink
J-DawgVarsity Captain
620 days ago
Score 0+-
Like maybe Bowie-over-Jordan stupid...or something of that nature.
Permalink
ProjectFranchise.OrgWaterboy
620 days ago
Score 0+-
Thats an interesting point, but then how long would you wait to evaluate. If you give the GM a couple years to see if his moves pan out, then the damage is already done and a team is ruined for years. If you can axe a GM immediately after a move fans disagree with, he is just going to make the most popular move anyway. I say cut out the middle man. As a side note, the regular fan voting would help generate significant ad revenue that would be pumped back into the team. This would give the ProjectFranchise.org team something no other minor league club.
Permalink
Ccampbell34All-American
620 days ago
Score 0+-
http://www.flyersbaseball.com/ it doesnt work at least where its been tried
Permalink | Reply
Ccampbell34All-American
620 days ago
Score 0+-
This minor league team let fans vote on every decision, and fans took it as a joke and the team was the worst in the league after clinching a seed in the championship game the first half, players played out of position etc.
Permalink
DRE-LOAAA-er
620 days ago
Score 0+-
I think that me and other Knicks fans on this site should rise as one, overthrow James Dolan from his unearned throne and start fixing this franchise. Who's with me?
Permalink | Reply
CrackajgDraft Pick
620 days ago
Score 0+-
A basketball d'etat!!
Permalink
What Would Oakley Do?Varsity
620 days ago
Score 3+-
I would have to say that the odds are actually in favor of a season-ticket holding fan of a big market team being more qualified than a retired athlete like Isiah Thomas. Now, I'm a big Knicks fan. Let's just put that out in the open.

And, I would say that most season-ticket holders (which I am not, though I usually get to a little less than half of the home games) at the Garden are well-educated and have a far more relevant resume and are far better equipped intellectually to understand the vagaries of a salary cap and a luxury tax. Most grown-up fans work in the business world in some capacity. Whether they run a family deli or are a financial analyst at one of the many places doing better than Bear Stearns, they will have an understanding of what it takes to run something with a purpose and with accountabilty. They will likely have an undergraduate if not a graduate education and will be used to having the livelihood of themselves and their loved ones hanging in the balance of the decisions that they make. Meanwhile, there are former players (Zeke, I'm looking at you) who breezed through a few semesters of undergrad and have never put in a day's work of mental labor. They are gifted beyond comprehension physically and they may know how to recognize such traits in others but THEY DO NOT KNOW HOW TO RUN A FRANCHISE, which is made up of so many moving parts and contains more people in the marketing department than the layup department. Players know there sport. They know the game and oftentimes that is all they know. That's not there fault. In fact, it is there honor. That they were so talented that they didn't need to get an education. But this is the achilles heel when it comes to managing a ballclub.

Sports like baseball and football seem to have caught on to this. There are more math-geeks in baseball front offices than Hall of Fame players and the NFL has been following suite even though Matt Millen has managed to keep his job for so long.

Yet, for some reason the NBA has resisted this revelation. Resisted the reality that running a franchise is so very, very complicated these days. And, that most poorly educated former players don't have the necessary experience and skill set for the task. So, yeah, I think that there are a lot of "fans" out there sitting

And, yes, this is a long way to say that Isiah Thomas shouldn't be a Team President. Or a General Manager. Or, even allowed to balance his own check book.
Permalink | Reply
ProjectFranchise.OrgWaterboy
620 days ago
Score 0+-
Well said WWOD
Permalink
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free
Categories: Opinions | Opinions by User Crackajg | March 19, 2008 | March 2008 | Crackajg Opinions | Sports Opinions | Project Franchise Opinions | Fans Opinions

Don't Miss

Phillies World Series 2009: A Year Later, and They Still Don't Want Us
Sorry, But I'm Not Sorry
2009 NHL Preview
In Which Ricketts Wins World Series
2009 Week 3: Let’s Talk About Your Favorite NFL Team

In the News

Hey ArmchairGM users! Want to help the admins update this news section? Click here to help us out.

Comments of the Day

0 Fred McGriff was better than Tony Perez.

Play the Picture Game

Stupidest Baseball Injuries

New Articles

The Los Angeles Dodgers Dominated the Yankees in the 1963 World Series
How Can Fred McGriff Not Be Elected to the Hall of Fame?
Best African-American Quarterback Ever?
Ken Caminiti: National League's 1996 MVP
Winter Olympics 2010

Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Article:ImmersedFan_GM:_Could_a_fan_run_franchise_really_work%3F"

This page was last modified 12:27, 19 March 2008. Content is available under the GFDL.

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise