armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan

About the Author

Other recent voters

If you like the article, vote for it.
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

How to Discern the Bruins Diehard from the Bandwagonner

by Rawbeezeitz
created April 28, 2009, last edited December 02, 2009
10
Vote

A good team in Boston has risen from the muck of mediocrity, to the light of day. As is normally the case when this happens, the bandwagonners, front-runners, pink-hats, and fair-weathered fans come out of the woodwork. Here’s a quick guide for those navigating the Hub of Hockey, how to spot these folks, who only help teams by dumping money into them. And how to spot the people who were there when the going was tough.


Most of this is how to spot the true fans, and find the frauds through process of elimination.


The Bruins actually did something to make this all easier. They modified their logo. They went from a flat “B“, to a stylized version. Personally, I like the new “B” because it sort of goes along with the unspoken theme of a New Brand of Bruin. But if someone is wearing apparel with the old “B,” you can bet they’ve been a fan for longer than 5 months.



vs.



Or have they? The Bruins have a third kind of supporter: The Prodigal Fan. Those who left the flock, then returned. Are these those fair-weathered fans dusting off their Andy Moog sweaters, disguised as loyal diehards? Sort of, I guess. But it’s a tad more complex than a group of people who stopped following a team that was losing.


The NHL Lockout was the last straw for many of these guys. That coupled with the ownership of the Bruins utterly refusing to spend money to retain their own talent, let alone go out and get new players. Joe Thornton, Sergei Samsonov, Bill Guerin, Andrew Raycroft, all recent cast-offs because they got too good. This can be more than frustrating. The team developed talent, and wasn’t horrible, but they refused to get better. The team was one of the most profitable in the League, but refused to spend. The loyal cadre of Bruins fans who still went to games eventually became fed up. The Lockout was the perfect time to exit.


These fans do not deserve the label “diehard,” but they aren’t on the opposite extreme, either. They didn’t follow another hockey team, and when the Bruins showed some life last year in the playoffs, they started to come back. They’re jilted lovers, hesitant to be friends with their ex, and they kind of act that way. One redeemable quality, and a good way to detect the true Prodigal Fan, is a sense of contrition, and the willingness to freely and openly admit to their straying.


Milan Lucic is an interesting issue. While many diehards love the way he plays hockey, many pink hats of the female persuasion simply love him. He’s growing into the Dustin Pedroia of the Bruins. Milan Lucic t-shirts, jerseys, and hats could mean anything. Unless, of course, they have the #62 (his original digits) on it.


An obscure way to spot a diehard is to utter the phrase “Too many men on the ice.” If the test subject cringes a bit, he/she is a diehard. I can’t explain why this test works. It’s a secret. And it's painful to discuss.


A hatred for anything French sounding, even going so far as to call Patrice Bergeron “Patrick Burger On.”


Hating the Colorado Avalanche is a good indicator of a longtime fan. Why? Because the Aves were once the Nordiques.



A good name to drop is Jeremy Jacobs, the Ebenezer Scrooge of the Bruins. New fans can learn about the players and coaches, but the owner’s name is hardly ever dropped on TV and only occasionally on the radio. If they don’t know who Jacobs is, they’re not a fan. PERIOD. No owner is more well-known amongst its true fan base. If Jacobs ever went to a Bruins game, it’d be a security risk.



If they know who Jacobs is AND LIKE HIM, then they’re Mr. Jacobs’ son or daughter and should be held for ransom.


If they accidentally call the the Garden by an old name, i.e. “Fleet Center” or even “Shawmut Center,” they've been fans for awhile.


They wish the Whalers were back just so they could have another team to hate. And they LOVE the Whaler’s theme song.



They can at least hum the Bruins’ theme song from the WSBK days.



If they guess that any Dropkick Murphy’s song is the Bruins’ theme song, slap them as hard as humanly possible.


They don’t think the B’s will win it all, or if they do, phrases like “Bruins in 6” are said with a shocking, unreal tone of voice, as if the predictor were saying “I can fly.” Or are said as a question. “I think the Bruins will win it all?”


A penchant for wearing black (and not knowing what “penchant” means), particularly leather.


If a Bruins fan doesn’t like Zdeno Chara, or admits to a period of not liking him, they’re a diehard. Chara’s a bastard, and spent 4 years with the Senators, being a bastard to everyone in the Northeast Division. Many Bruins fans still detest him, or feel uncomfortable cheering for him.



A diehard Bruins fan typically has a nemesis on the team, a player they can’t stand to see on the ice. P.J. Axelsson might be the most popular nemesis. Mine is Shane Hnidy, who’s a tough player, just not a smart one. He’s a defenseman who struggles with the basic tasks of being an NHL defenseman. He can’t keep the puck in the zone to save his life, he never gets back to prevent breakaways, he gives up possession in his own zone. I roll my eyes when he’s on the ice.


So these are just some of the ways to discern a true diehard from the inevitable wave of pink-hats and frontrunners. Then again, what’s wrong with pink-hats? Who doesn’t think it’s hot to see a cute girl wearing their favorite team’s jersey? Hockey sweaters aren’t conducive to accentuating the female form, but if worn properly, perhaps with an elastic (that’s New Englander for rubber band) around the waist to make it tight, it can be a wicked hot outfit. After all, you can’t tuck in your Bruins jersey...


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
CheezerAll-Star
287 days ago
Score 3+-
I used to cringe when someone said, "Too many men on the ice." Now I do a little happy dance. I believe the word is "jig".
Permalink | Reply
JuTMSY4Legend
287 days ago
Score 1+-
I definitely cringe when I hear "too many men on the ice" Mostly when thinking of Jack Parker...bastard...
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
287 days ago
Score 3+-
That phrase does many many cringe, I should clarify that someone who claims to be a Bruins fan and does't cringe probably isn't a real fan.
Permalink
TrizzAll-American
287 days ago
Score 1+-
While i never been a fan of a sport that puts players in timeout...i guess im a bandwagoner cuz i only been following the B's for about the past year and a half
Permalink | Reply
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
287 days ago
Score 0+-
That's borderline, I think. If you'd become a fan this year, then it'd be a clear-cut case.
Permalink
DeutscherRed-Shirting
287 days ago
Score 2+-
Really? I find the penalty box is one aspect of hockey that makes it a true team sport. There you sit all alone while your mates have to work together to kill off your penalty.
Permalink
Steel TownDraft Pick
287 days ago
Score 3+-
I feel bandwagoners are a lot like draft picks. You really don't know what they are until 3 or 4 years down the road. It is then that you will know how they react in the face of adversity. We all had to start being a fan at sometime, right?
Permalink | Reply
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
287 days ago
Score 1+-
Very true. And bandwagoners aren't bandwagoners unless it's trendy to like the team. Right now, the Bruins are on the brink of being trendy. But it's still all about the Celtics and Sox.
Permalink
Davis21wylieMVP
287 days ago
Score 2+-
And the Patriots. Or are we not trendy anymore? I can't keep up.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
287 days ago
Score 3+-
In April? Not really.
Permalink
Davis21wylieMVP
287 days ago
Score 2+-
But the Draft!

Eh, I guess I was the only one who cared.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
287 days ago
Score 1+-
No way dude...I love the Draft I love me some Maclin too...
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
287 days ago
Score 2+-
Exactly, D21, real fans cared, but the trendy ones didn't sit around watching ESPN2 all day Sunday watching the draft.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
287 days ago
Score 0+-
How could I miss the opportunity to see LJ Smith Part 2 get drafted (Cornelius Ingram) But honestly, I find it hard to believe anyone is hanging on every work of McShay, Kiper or Mayock. Its something you turn on and do something else during...even during the first round...
Permalink
Steel TownDraft Pick
287 days ago
Score 1+-
I consider myself a real fan Rawb and I didn't watch the draft at all. The newspaper is perfect for draft coverage in my mind. It gives the writers time to research your teams selections and give you a nice overview on Sunday and monday morning. I might be enticed to watch the draft if the Steelers had a top 10 pick. But even a top ten pick could be a few hours wasted.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
287 days ago
Score 1+-
real fans cared,


I didn't say real fans watched the whole thing, just that they cared, and the trendy fans CERTAINLY didn't watch any of the draft, or care about it.
Permalink
Davis21wylieMVP
287 days ago
Score 0+-
Yeah, I mean, I watched the NBA Playoffs and Sox-Yanks all weekend, but I still made sure to follow the draft on the internet.
Permalink
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
287 days ago
Score 6+-
For the survival of the league, doesn't hockey need all the fans (diehard or not) it can acquire?
Permalink | Reply
CheezerAll-Star
287 days ago
Score 7+-
Stop being sensical. There is no room for such logic on the internet.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
287 days ago
Score 5+-
Frontrunners and bandwagoners are GREAT! You can't tell me that the NHL won't be thrilled if the Rangers win tonight and New York, Chicago, SoCal, and Boston all have teams in the 2nd round.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
287 days ago
Score 4+-
Please, I want NY out...

I think any Hockey fan has to be drooling over a possible Ovie-Cindy matchup

What will the refs do with their whistles?
Permalink
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
287 days ago
Score 6+-
And ruin the Sean Avery Reality Show?
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
287 days ago
Score 3+-
I was disappointed Phaneuf was out last night...if anything the NHL needs more Elisha Cuthbert action shots...
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
287 days ago
Score 2+-
I actually want to play the Rangers in the 2nd round, they look so vulnerable.
Permalink
Davis21wylieMVP
287 days ago
Score 4+-
For me, the lockout is definitely it. I've been merely a casual NHL fan since then, and to be honest, I've barely jumped back on the bandwagon even now. I used to be the biggest hockey fan, and I'll go through periods where I at least care somewhat, but mostly it's limited to the Stanley Cup Finals and the occasional peek-in on the Bruins if they're doing well. I just can't get past the lost season. I often wonder, what's the point in investing yourself when they can take it away just like that over money? It was different for baseball because I was too young in 1994 to understand -- the Red Sox were there, and then they were gone a bit longer than usual, and then they came back again. But to be an adult, and to be without hockey for what, 18 months? And the whole time saying, "Fine. Fuck the NHL. If they don't need me, I don't need them."? It's tough to come back from that, man. It's like I feel obligated to root for the Bruins now, but inside I sometimes couldn't care less.
Permalink | Reply
CheezerAll-Star
287 days ago
Score 3+-
Funny. That's exactly how I feel about Baseball.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
287 days ago
Score 2+-
The players being able to play in Europe kind of pissed me off too. They were on strike, yet they were playing hockey. We just couldn't watch it. So the fans were the ones that got fucked.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
287 days ago
Score 1+-
I was only 9 during the '94 strike, and pretty much had the same reaction as D21. It was just a longer off-season.
Permalink
Davis21wylieMVP
287 days ago
Score 4+-
I think there's a hierarchy of work-stoppages in sports, from most forgivable to borderline unforgivable:

1. Season canceled due to global economic problems (Arena Football 2009) - Can't really blame anybody, tough times all around.

2. Mildly shortened season (MLB 1995) due to labor conflict - Barely mattered, except that the season started a month late.

3. Half-season due to labor conflict, with playoffs (NHL 1995, NBA 1999) - Can actually make things more exciting than usual, because the regular season isn't a marathon anymore, it's a sprint.

4. Half-season due to labor conflict, no playoffs (MLB 1994) - Only redeeming feature is you can leave the results open-ended, play the "What If?" game. So it's basically like college football is every season.

5. No season due to labor conflict (NHL 2005) - Unforgivable.
Permalink
CheezerAll-Star
287 days ago
Score 0+-
They canceled the series in '94.
Permalink
Davis21wylieMVP
287 days ago
Score 1+-
I know. That would fit under the "Half-season due to labor conflict, no playoffs" category.
Permalink
Davis21wylieMVP
287 days ago
Score 0+-
Granted, it was more than a half-season, but if we're breaking it down into "full season" or "half season", partial seasons (missing 50 games) are half in my mind.
Permalink
CheezerAll-Star
287 days ago
Score 2+-
Except you say that a half season can actually make things more exciting because the regular season becomes a sprint.

The 1994 MLB season was a marathon that ran into a wall.

You notice I don't disagree with what you say about Hockey, but I became a playoff Wings fan in the early 90's and I remain so to this date.

What baseball did is just as unforgivable to me.
Permalink
CheezerAll-Star
287 days ago
Score 2+-
I equated the wrong statement. I still think that canceled playoffs is just as unforgivable as a canceled season.
Permalink
Davis21wylieMVP
287 days ago
Score 2+-
No doubt the gap between #3 & #4 is huge when compared to the gap between #4 & #5, but I feel like #4 is superior because they at least played some games in 1994. Something is better than nothing. And like I said, it's not like we got less of a resolution to MLB '94 than we do every single year in college football. Maybe they should have held an AP poll to determine the World Series winner?
Permalink
CheezerAll-Star
287 days ago
Score 3+-
This user needs to read better before commenting.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
287 days ago
Score 2+-
I think a lot of factors go into it. I too was royally pissed by the NHL Lockout, but I don't really like basketball, so what choice did I have for a winter sport? Curling's not on TV that much.


But if I liked basketball, or if the C's had been watchable, I may have lost a lot of my love for hockey.


Age, how much you care about a sport, why you care about a sport, et cetera play big parts.


Personally, I was mad at the baseball strike until my father got sick and passed on, put things in perspective. Being mad at ballplayers didn't make much sense. And I actually became a bigger baseball fan after the strike in '95 because it was a consistency in life that I really needed. I guess my point is that sports mean different things to us, and when they go on strike/lockout, we'll all react differently.
Permalink
CheezerAll-Star
287 days ago
Score 2+-
I'm not to belittling your comment Rawb. I couldn't resist the urge to link this. You sound like Terence Mann
Permalink
Davis21wylieMVP
287 days ago
Score 2+-
That's true. I suppose a lot of my feelings come from the NHL being a vastly different league now from the way it was when I grew up. I mean, shootouts? Points for losses?

Re:Cheezer, don't sweat it man, my comment/list wasn't exactly the most coherent thing I've ever written, so it's no biggie.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
287 days ago
Score 1+-
Cheezer: hilarious!


D21: Yeah, I like the rule changes, but I've always liked watching European rules hockey in the Olympics, so it's like the NHL finally woke up to the way the game should be played. Then again, if MLB came back in 1995 and banned the double play or something, I'd be pissed.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
287 days ago
Score 1+-
Jim Rice and Cal Ripken Jr. wouldn't be pissed if they would have eliminated it...
Permalink
Davis21wylieMVP
287 days ago
Score 1+-
LOL, as Simmons would say, Jim Ed was a mortal lock for a 6-4-3 with a runner on 1st & 1 out.
Permalink
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
287 days ago
Score 3+-
Is it just me or does that dude in the Bruins jersey holding the sign above his head look a little like Bill Cowher?
Permalink | Reply
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
287 days ago
Score 2+-
Same jaw.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
287 days ago
Score 2+-
black and gold doesn't hurt the similarities either.
Permalink
DeutscherRed-Shirting
287 days ago
Score 3+-
All this talk about losing love for hockey makes me sad. I actually welcomed the lockout and the changes it brought. The clutch and grab era had gone on for too long with no salary cap the Oilers and other small market teams where doomed to always be on the outside looking in. It was awful, my hope for the NHL just slipped away till one day I was watching a WHL game and someone mentioned the NHL and I replied "oh I don't even watch that anymore". I was done,out, never to look back till the lockout where I gave the NHL one more chance to win me back.
Permalink | Reply
Steel TownDraft Pick
287 days ago
Score 3+-
I have to say the lockout was painful but the results were fantastic. I'm also a fan of the shootout which is very unpopular.
Permalink
CheezerAll-Star
287 days ago
Score 1+-
Love the shoot-out.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
287 days ago
Score 1+-
shootout = terrible
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
287 days ago
Score 3+-
I just wish the shootout was different, make it best of 5 goals, not just 3. Or make it 2 shooters vs. goalie+defenseman
Permalink
Davis21wylieMVP
287 days ago
Score 3+-
I feel like the lockout was the final nail in the coffin, the culmination of Bettman's cash-grab southern overexpansion/franchise relocation, the neutral-zone trap, the odd clutch-n-grab, scoring numbers flatlining (Jagr won the Ross one year with <100 points), goalies who resembled the Michelin Man, etc. There's no doubt that the game now is more watchable than it was right before the lockout, but the fact that they did it by adding gimmicks like the shootout shouts volumes about Bettman's ongoing boneheaded quick-fix mentality, and where the game will inevitably go as long as he's commissioner.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
287 days ago
Score 1+-
Nope...

nbajam.jpg

That's the nail in the coffin
Permalink
DeutscherRed-Shirting
287 days ago
Score 2+-
Davis I agree with you 100% on Bettman, mans an idiot get rid of him already. I also feel not too much love towards the shootout but I also don't hate them...Hmm. Anyways a lot of the watchability of the "new" NHL is the refs actually calling interference now. Its wonderful and has created a new hockey player that has to actually skate to knock a player off the puck instead of clutch,grab,slash,hook,slash,grab,clutch. Its nice to see guys like Peca (douche) go obsolete cause guess what everyone has to play defence now.This actual enforcement of the rules doesn't feel like a gimmick maybe more like its about damm time.
Permalink
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
287 days ago
Score 4+-
This might be the most commented upon article focused on hockey that I have seen here in quite sometime. Anyone else remember that glorious "hockey is a hobby" post?
Permalink | Reply
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
287 days ago
Score 1+-
HAHAHAHAHA that was classic, what was the name of that user? He had like two names.
Permalink
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
287 days ago
Score 3+-
Barronandtheroc http://armch...ARBAGE_SPORT..
Permalink
DeutscherRed-Shirting
287 days ago
Score 2+-
you beat me by 13 seconds.
Permalink
SSreportersLegend
287 days ago
Score 3+-
I kinda miss them. An online sports community always needs at least 1 user (or users or whatever they were) to go against all logic and sense to form an "opinion" on a sport they don't like.
Permalink
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
285 days ago
Score 0+-
No worries. I can help fill that void a bit!
Permalink
DeutscherRed-Shirting
287 days ago
Score 2+-
http://armch...ARBAGE_SPORT..


good times good times.
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free
Categories: Braying Ass fans | Opinions | Opinions by User Rawbeezeitz | April 28, 2009 | April 2009 | NHL Opinions | Boston Bruins Opinions

Don't Miss

Manny Stiles presents Sports Augury - Super Bowl XLIV Edition
The New York Yankees' Worst Performance?
Baltimore and the Orioles Stopped Roger Maris
NHL Power Rankings: Week 18
Saints, Colts Set for Super Bowl in Miami

In the News

Hey ArmchairGM users! Want to help the admins update this news section? Click here to help us out.

Comments of the Day

0 where"s micheal vick

Play the Picture Game

Best HR Robbing Catch

New Articles

What to do now that Football is Over?
How the New York Yankees Bought Their No-Hitters
The Saints are now the Super Saints
The New York Yankees' Blackest Day in 40 Years
The Baseball Demise of Elston Gene Howard

Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Article:How_to_Discern_the_Bruins_Diehard_from_the_Bandwagonner"

This page was last modified 16:26, 28 April 2009. Content is available under the GFDL.

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise