armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan

About the Author

Taytay 24
I like sports.

More By Taytay 24

A high school coach who gets it
14 votes, 18 comments
College football: What might have been
9 votes, 35 comments
Sleight of hand
5 votes, 4 comments
View All

Other recent contributors

Make this page better by editing it.

Other recent voters

If you like the article, vote for it.
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Baseball v Cricket

by Taytay 24
created March 27, 2007, last edited November 15, 2009
17
Vote

I love this time of year and what it brings to the senses: the crack of the bat, sunlight in your eyes, the smell of the grass.

Baseball? No, cricket. Opening day is almost here, but down in the Caribbean, sixteen countries are vying for the Cricket World Cup. These two games share a common origin, but each have developed a following in different parts of the world. Typically, baseball fans know little of cricket and think their game is superior, and vice versa. You can read Wikipedia's comparison between cricket and baseball for all the details, but we are here today to decide once and for all which game is better. There are ten categories worth ten points each, plus a bonus category worth up to five points. Play ball.

Best current player

Image:Baseball_8.jpg You could easily substitute one of a handful of other players here, but Albert Pujols serves as a good representative. He has a career .332 batting average and has 250 home runs in six seasons. In his career, he has been named Rookie of the Year and MVP, and last year won the World Series with the St Louis Cardinals.

Image:Cricket_9.jpg Ricky Ponting is currently the number one ranked batsman in the world, so this choice is a little easier to make. He has a 59.29 batting average (his average runs scored per batting appearance) and 58.95 strike rate (runs per 100 balls). If you look at just the past five years, his batting average jumps to 74. Putting it bluntly: he already ranks as the number three batsman of all time.

Best historical player

Image:Baseball_9.jpg Most of Babe Ruth's records have fallen to various players over time, but none of them had the complete package the Babe did. He is known for his batting, but remember, he was a pretty good pitcher in his time with the Red Sox as well.

Image:Cricket_10.jpg 99.94. Any cricket fan in the world recognizes that number as Don Bradman's career batting average. Second place is a full twenty runs less; the rest of the pack tops out at 61. And these aren't just the Australians—we're talking worldwide, all-time players. Statistical analysis by Charles Davis in The Best of the Best reveals Bradman as the most dominant player in any major sport. He says by comparison, a baseball player would need a career .392 average to equal Sir Don's dominance.

Best rivalry

Image:Baseball_9.jpg Yankees/Red Sox: Love 'em or hate 'em, this is the best rivalry in the game. This intense rivalry stems from proximity, civic pride, divisional competition and the Curse of the Bambino. Fairly lopsided in the Yankees favor, but intense nonetheless, and more competitive of late.

Image:Cricket_9.jpg Australia/England: This rivalry dates to 1882, when Australia beat England on an English pitch for the first time, shocking the hosts and creating the legend of the ashes. It wouldn't be the last time. This rivalry is also rather lopsided, but both sides, and much of the cricket world, closely follow the Ashes Series.

Best venue

Image:Baseball_9.jpg This is another one that is up for debate, but I'll go with Wrigley Field. It's got ivy, day games and tons of history.

Image:Cricket_8.jpg Lords is considered the home of cricket. Many of cricket's greatest moments, particularly in the Ashes Series, took place here. It might be iconic, but I don't care for the look of the Media Centre.

Game length

Image:Baseball_9.jpg Three hours is a fairly standard time for the completion of a game in most major sports, and baseball fits the bill.

Image:Cricket_6.jpg There are variations of the game, but the most popular is test cricket, which lasts for five days. Even one day cricket lasts (surprise!) a day, or about six hours of playing time, plus lunch and tea breaks. Only the new (and often maligned) Twenty20 fits within the three hour window.

Outcomes

Image:Baseball_9.jpg You win. Or you lose. Short of a rainout, that's it.

Image:Cricket_4.jpg You win. Or you lose. Or, if you score the same number of runs, you could tie, although this is very unlikely. Or you could draw (which is different than a tie) if the game is not complete after the alloted time has expired. Yes, it is possible to play a game for five days and basically get no result.

Popularity

Image:Baseball_5.jpg Despite last year's World Baseball Classic, baseball is primarily limited to the US, the Caribbean, and parts of East Asia. And the WBC had to get a little creative to find sixteen teams—even Australia qualified.

Image:Cricket_6.jpg Cricket's strongest players are mostly within England and the Commonwealth. According to the International Cricket Council, there are ten full members, 32 associate members (cricket firmly established) and 55 affiliate members (cricket is played). By the way, the US is an associate member, but did not qualify for the Cricket World Cup.

Sportsmanship

Image:Baseball_5.jpg Baseball is notorious for the phrase 'if you aren't cheating, you aren't trying'. Corked bats, pine tar and of course steroids are all issues in the game today. Players and managers arguing with umps is also common, and a player would never correct a call to his own detriment. The redeeming factor is the unwritten code of respect that requires teams to stop stealing bases with a big lead or not show up a pitcher after a home run.

Image:Cricket_9.jpg Cricket players often police themselves during a game and arguing calls is rare. About the worst you get is sledging, the cricket equivalent of 'we need a pitcher, not a belly itcher'.

Trophy

Image:Baseball_3.jpg World Series Trophy — My little league trophies were cooler than this.

Image:Cricket_9.jpg The Ashes — Now this little urn tells a story, and you can read a little about it here.

Uniforms

Image:Baseball_9.jpg Personally, I like the simplicity of the home whites/road grays. But I hate the softball team look of the alternate colored jerseys.

Image:Cricket_8.jpg Test cricket looks great with the whites. One Day and Twenty20 looks ridiculous with the pajamas.

Bonus: Kooky Traditions

Image:Baseball_3.jpg More than a few baseball players don't step on lines, always step on bases or some variation when running onto the field.

Image:Cricket_5.jpg Cricket has the Nelson, representing a run score of 111. Named for Lord Horatio Nelson, supposedly for a missing eye, arm and leg, the score is thought to be unlucky. Umpires are often seen standing on one leg while a batter is on this score.

Well, the numbers don't lie: Cricket wins 83-78. Neither game is flawless, but you can't go wrong with either one. The good news is this: you don't have to choose. So enjoy the start of the baseball season, but make an effort to catch some of the Cricket World Cup action over the next few weeks, even if they are playing in their pajamas.

Also published at 110 Percent.


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
977 days ago
Score 1+-
Horatio Nelson was only missing an arm and an eye. He was a Navy Admiral and won some pretty Historically IMPORTANT naval battles. Not THAT unlucky, he also stole his superior officer's wife.
Permalink | Reply
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
977 days ago
Score 1+-
But most importantly, for everyone to know, his last words were not "kiss me hardy"! That's General Ignorance of the non-sporting kind. (They were "drink drink, kiss kiss, rub rub", or something like that...)
Permalink
Taytay 24All-American
977 days ago
Score 1+-
Correct, but 111 is still named in his honor, even if erroneously.
Permalink
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
977 days ago
Score 1+-
Cricket has loads more Kooky Traditions! Formal breaks for lunch and tea! (No other game in the world stops to eat). The "taking guard" doesn't happen in baseball. The coin toss (something baseball doesn't have)... Cricket it way better than baseball. Still, good to hear from another cricket fan!
Permalink | Reply
TartanVarsity Captain
977 days ago
Score 0+-
Blasphemy
Permalink
Taytay 24All-American
977 days ago
Score 1+-
Of course it does, as does baseball, but I had to be selective here. I find the one leg thing facinating.
Permalink
Taytay 24All-American
977 days ago
Score 0+-
Plus, tea and lunch breaks are a simple result of playing a game for eight hours a day. Not really kooky—a guy's got to eat.
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
977 days ago
Score 1+-
Little known fact - Grasshoppers have twice the nutrition of a cricket. But crickets DO taste better than a baseball.
Permalink | Reply
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
977 days ago
Score 1+-
We'll take your word for it Manny...
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #1
977 days ago
Score -3+-
Cricket has not fully evolved. It is an extremely crude game for unsophisticated fans. I can guarantee you a mlb player could easily hit a ball in cricket. I can also guarantee you that a cricket player would not be able to hit a baseball.
Permalink | Reply
Taytay 24All-American
977 days ago
Score 1+-
Not sure what you are basing your guarantees on. A fast bowl travels just as fast as a MLB fastball and a spin bowler can do mad things with the ball. A ball coming off the pitch is much harder to read than a baseball pitch that stays in the air. I haven't had much practice and am certainly no major leaguer, but I had a great deal of difficulty hitting a cricket bowl, and I was being bowled at by kids, not Shane Warne. Plus, cricket bats are more difficult to handle because of the weight distribution. I'm sure there are many MLB players who could succeed at cricket, but don't be naive (or is it arrogance?) enough to think it couldn't go the other way. Ponting could be an All Star if he played baseball. As for cricket's evolution, crudeness and it's unsophisticated fans—please. Cricket has been around for hundreds of years, virtually unchanged for over two hundred. The game is quite refined and the average cricket fan is much more knowledgeable of the game than the average attendant at a baseball game. You don't have to like the game, but give it a chance before you speak of things you aren't familiar with.
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #2
425 days ago
Score 1+-
Right, I feel we need to clear a few things up here.

First of all, your statement that cricket is "a crude game for unsophisticated fans is frankly ludicrous. References to 'cricket' have been found as far back as the mid sixteenth century with international matches recorded as early as the early 1800's.

Whilst the 'world series' of baseball is contested between the two best domestic sides from the USA, the cricket world cup is played by national sides from all corners of the globe. Cricket is appreciated by people all over the world and therefore has a far more widespread fan base than just one or two countries.

It takes patience and a great deal of concentration to fully appreciate a five day test match, and it can be frustrating at times, but the sheer emotional highs and lows and the way a match constantly swings throughout it's duration are unlike anything seen in baseball or even, for that matter, the shorter form of the game. It takes a sophisticated person to appreciate these qualities, as opposed to the 'wham, bam, thank you mam' nature of baseball.

The power and natural ability needed to smash a baseball into the stands is clerly great, but when a batsman carefully plays his way to a high scoring innings it is a reflection not only on his pure ability but also on his patience, his concentration and, above all, his character. A batter in baseball can only score four runs at most in one go, but a skilled batsman can almost win a match on his own by offering a stubborn resistance and skilfully crafting an innings. Brian Lara, a west indian batsman, once scored 501 runs in one innings of an english county championship match.

Not to say that there are no examples of pure explosive ability in cricket. Right handed batsman Kevin pietersen has, on several occasions, turned around and hit the ball for six left handed and batsman have been known to hit the ball in excess of 120 yards.

A baseball swing is similar to a hook/pull shot in cricket so cricketers would most likely be able adapt to some extent (some more so than others) but batting in cricket involves a wide variety of shots, most of which bare no similarity to anything seen in baseball. I think baseball players would struggle when asked to react to each individual ball and then select and execute an appropriate shot. Contrary to your belief, as a keen cricketer, I believe the vast majority of baseball players would struggle to survive against someone bowling at around 70mph, let alone speeds of over 90mph which international fast bowlers can reach.

Don't get me wrong, I'm sure most cricketers would struggle if presented with a top pitcher throwing curves, sliders etc. but good fast bowlers can make the ball move two or three feet from side to side and spinners can make a ball move even further as it bounces-just watch Shane Warne at his best. Great bowlers can be almost unplayable for the world's best batsmen on their day, let alone someone who has never held a cricket bat.

Look, I'm not here to knock baseball, it is a fine sport in it's own right but you must appreciate the fact that there are so many subtleties and skills that are not necessarily obvious to those who do not have a full understanding of the game.
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #3
177 days ago
Score 0+-
I have to say that this is pretty funny to read. Did you see the YouTube video of Manny Ramirez trying to hit a cricket ball? I'd bet any amount of money that KP would be hitting a baseball waaaay better than that. I also cannot resist saying that MR had been taking PEDs as well - they obviously didn't work.
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #4
970 days ago
Score 0+-
Cricket's most popular version is the one-day game, not test. That's for the purists. And,oh, cricket is way way way better.
Permalink | Reply
Taytay 24All-American
963 days ago
Score 0+-
I address all three forms of the game here. But, yes, I am a purist and prefer test.
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #5
964 days ago
Score 0+-
id like to see a baseball player try to bowl in cricket HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
Permalink | Reply
Taytay 24All-American
963 days ago
Score 0+-
It's not harder to learn than any other skill.
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #3
177 days ago
Score 1+-
Nice article and it's a pleasure to read something by someone who clearly appreciates both sports. I have read a lot of why x game is better than y game on the net and they are almost always written by someone who knows and loves one of the two and knows almost nothing about the other. I am English but I know a lot about baseball and follow it closely and the more I learn about baseball the more I enjoy it. Baseball and cricket are kissing cousins. We should be appreciating these two great games and reserve our criticisms for football (either sort).
Permalink
Taytay 24All-American
177 days ago
Score 0+-
AF3: sign up! Thoughtful sports fans are always appreciated!
Permalink
RohandevganAll-American
830 days ago
Score 1+-
i think baseball is a lot easier than cricket. people who know cricket and baseball will understand my next few points.

1. Baseballers use gloves to field wheras cricketers use bare hands (ex wk) 2. in cricket full tosses are bad balls and are dispatched all over the place, in baseball every ball is a waist high or slightly lower full toss.

3. cricket u get one chance when ure out baseball has three strikes and then maybe u can also come back after few innings
Permalink | Reply
RomiezzoLegend
830 days ago
Score 1+-
Good article, but what about the India/Pakistan rivalry? I think that's pretty big as well as the England/Australia one.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #6
677 days ago
Score 1+-
Baseball has a better running game with the diamond bases, runners stealing bases, home runs & double plays. Cricket's running game is rather boring running back and forth between the wickets. Cricket has better batting game with shots played anywhere within a 360 degree playing field, 4 or 6 run scoring shots & variety in bowling deliveries. Baseball batters can only hit the ball in front of them or down the foul line on a smaller playing field. Baseball pitching has less variety than cricket.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #7
600 days ago
Score 0+-
Pretty sure that Ponting isn't #1, Tendulkar or Dravid must have him. Sure, his average is higher, but that doesn't say much about a player except that his team mates can't score, or that he has to contribute in all partnerships. Most ppl will agree that Tendulkar has Ponting for technique and skill (Not that Ponting is bad, I just think Tendla is better)
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #8
320 days ago
Score 0+-
Cricket surely requires much more skill than baseball because of the wide variety of balls bowled by the bowler and in addition to the high speeds of the ball, the bounce also has to be accounted for when offering a shot. Also, spinners can do magic with the ball, spinning into or outwards from the batsman. (see shane warne or murali or ajanta mendis on youtube) But I agree,baseball does require a fitness levels a little above criket, however, cricket fielders catch the ball without a glove and are also very very fit (Jhonty Rhodes)
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #9
214 days ago
Score 0+-
i agree with romiezzo
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #10
159 days ago
Score 0+-
.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #10
159 days ago
Score 0+-
Anonymous Fanatic #8: did you see "baseball does require a fitness levels a little above criket,". you must be out of your mind. tell me, howmuch running does a baseball player do in a game? or howmuch fielding or work time does a baseball player put in each game? of course you have to have a lot of muscle to hit to 400ft home runs, but their ability to last long out on the field cant compare to cricketers.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #11
50 days ago
Score 0+-
Lets get the best of baseball and the best of cricket and let them play eachother at the others game, if anything it will be interesting and fun to watch! Give The Baseball team some time to learn Cricket and Cricket team to learn baseball, then let the games begin!
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Categories: Opinions | Opinions by User Taytay 24 | March 27, 2007 | Baseball Opinions | Cricket Opinions | 110 Percent Opinions

Don't Miss

Phillies World Series 2009: A Year Later, and They Still Don't Want Us
Sorry, But I'm Not Sorry
2009 NHL Preview
In Which Ricketts Wins World Series
2009 Week 3: Let’s Talk About Your Favorite NFL Team

In the News

Hey ArmchairGM users! Want to help the admins update this news section? Click here to help us out.

Comments of the Day

0 LaDanian Tomlinson (check the QB rating)
0 Only because the voters are facking stupid. "Numbers" are...

Play the Quiz Game

in 1983 Dave Winfield hit & killed a seagull with a thrown baseball. In what city did this occur?

New Articles

How Can Fred McGriff Not Be Elected to the Hall of Fame?
Best African-American Quarterback Ever?
Ken Caminiti: National League's 1996 MVP
Winter Olympics 2010
Highlights from Dubai 7's

Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Article:Baseball_v_Cricket"

This page was last modified 07:06, 1 May 2008. Content is available under the GFDL.

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise