armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan

About the Author

Niteowl049
Baseball fan following baseball since 1955. Have been fortunate enough to have seen Ted Williams, Mickey Mantle, Roger Maris, Johnny Bench, Roberto Clemente and Dale Murphy play baseball in Kansas City and Houston. Served in Army in Hawaii and Vietnam with 25th Infantry Division.

More By Niteowl049

Baseball Notebook: Barry "Balco" Bonds 756th Home Run Ball in Hall of Fame
26 votes, 54 comments
Baseball Notebook: Ken Griffey Jr. Hits Walkoff Homer
14 votes, 8 comments
White Sox Sweep Cubs
12 votes, 4 comments
View All

Other recent voters

If you like the article, vote for it.
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Baseball Notebook: Player's Union Doesn't Get it on Bonds Rejection

by Niteowl049
created May 07, 2008, last edited February 10, 2009
12
Vote

The player's union is alleging that Barry Bonds has not been signed because the owners conspired together to not sign him. Personally I think it is a case of nobody wanting to sign a player who has burned too many bridges behind him. His agent Jeff Borris says that he hasn't received an offer of any amount since Bonds became eligible to be signed as a free agent.

I doubt that the owners would combine forces to keep Bonds out of baseball after the owners were forced to pay $280 million in 1990 for collusion. Bonds has simply worn out his welcome in major league baseball. There has not been a sinister plot to keep him out of baseball. Bonds is not a team player and that as much as anything has kept him from being signed.

Anytime a player like Bonds expects and gets special treatment there is going to be resentment from the other players. Another reason is that teams don't even want to talk money with Bonds and his agent because his asking price will be a lot more than he is worth unless Bonds is so desperate to get his 3000th hit he would ask for a paltry sum to play in 2008 at some point in the season.

Bonds may help a team as a designated hitter but he is subject to injuries that would not even let him play in the American League if he can't bat. If a National League team were to sign him I would be in complete shock since his fielding has been progressively worse every year and he doesn't have the wheels to run down fly balls unless they are hit directly to him or in his immediate vicinity.

Another major reason a team would not want to sign Bonds is the perception that he has used steroids which is 99.9 percent certain and by signing him they are condoning his using steroids. There may be a team that is desperate to sign Bonds but I can't see that happening. If they do buyer beware. The main selling point Bonds has is his .480 on base percentage of last season. For a team having trouble scoring runs he could make a difference. The season is close to 25 percent over and I think the teams are finding out major league baseball can survive without Bonds.


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
TrizzAll-American
552 days ago
Score 1+-
Forget what happened at the Derby....THIS is how you beat a dead horse the MLBPA wont rest until Bonds is signed
Permalink | Reply
Niteowl049AAA-er
552 days ago
Score 0+-
Why isn't MLBPA worried about other players not signed for 2008 season? What about Sammy Sosa, Mike Piazza and Kenny Lofton? I agree they are not going to give up till the season is over.
Permalink | Reply
TrizzAll-American
552 days ago
Score 2+-
Actually they are looking at Bonds, Lofton, Piazza, Sosa, Clemens, Mesa and Wells
Permalink
Niteowl049AAA-er
552 days ago
Score 0+-
So far they haven't actually filed a grievance but that is probably the next step.
Permalink | Reply
Niteowl049AAA-er
552 days ago
Score 0+-
Lofton and maybe Piazza are the only ones I would sign if I was an owner.
Permalink | Reply
TrizzAll-American
552 days ago
Score 2+-
Piazza would be best servedon a team like the Reds or the Pirates who have young guys that could use a veteran catcher
Permalink
Steel TownDraft Pick
552 days ago
Score 2+-
Does he have a pulse and has he played on a .500+ team before? Send him to Pittsburgh.
Permalink
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
552 days ago
Score 3+-
Do they even require a pulse in Pittsburgh anymore?
Permalink
Niteowl049AAA-er
552 days ago
Score 0+-
Was really surprised Piazza wasn't signed and also Sosa considering Sosa had 92 RBI's but he slumped after the All Star game having over 60 RBI's at the break.
Permalink | Reply
Xman2008Varsity
552 days ago
Score 1+-
Both Clemens and Bonds have legal issues hanging over them, so as an owner, I wouldn't even go near them. They are also both past their prime (WAY past).
AS for the other three, Piazza and Sosa would best be served in the AL, as a DH. Lofton can still play the field, but I would look at him as a corner fielder, rather than a center fielder.
Permalink | Reply
OvertheedgeVarsity
552 days ago
Score 1+-
nobody wants bonds because nobody wants the image he brings with him, no fan base would be happy with the signing, and why pay some old dude when they could call up a young player to get experience who would actually see more playing time than bonds could physically do
Permalink | Reply
Niteowl049AAA-er
552 days ago
Score 0+-
I agree with Xman and Overtheedge that nobody wants to pay overage guys the kind of money they want. I heard Sosa wanted $9 million after making $500,000 last season so you can imagine what Bonds would want.
Permalink | Reply
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
552 days ago
Score 2+-
Bonds always has been his own worst enemy. If he really wanted to play, he'd make that known and drop his asking price. I think that a mil or two is about right, based on the production you'd likely get. Load it with incentives and let him earn his pay. The MLBPA would never back that, now would they? Collusion...please. Common sense.
Permalink
Niteowl049AAA-er
551 days ago
Score 0+-
SJ...I agree that Bonds should earn his pay if signed. I still wouldn't be surprised to see the Yankees sign him since they have more money than they have sense but his .480 on base percentage has to be awful enticing to a lot of teams.
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free
Categories: Opinions | Opinions by User Niteowl049 | May 7, 2008 | May 2008 | MLB Opinions

Don't Miss

Phillies World Series 2009: A Year Later, and They Still Don't Want Us
Sorry, But I'm Not Sorry
2009 NHL Preview
In Which Ricketts Wins World Series
2009 Week 3: Let’s Talk About Your Favorite NFL Team

In the News

The battle between Adidas and the University of Central Florida over the brand of shoes Michael Jordan's son will wear has cost the school any future sponsorship with Adidas. Ring, ring. That must be Nike on the phone.

Comments of the Day

1 Pssst! Phillies "fans"... you lost. Get over it already. ...
0 why join in sports

Play the Picture Game

Best HR Robbing Catch

New Articles

Bad Flashbacks: An Analysis of USC v ASU
What If Brad Lidge Had Started Game One?
Week 9 Postgame: Trick or Treat?
Dear FIFA, UEFA, & Football Fans... It is time.
Make it Number 27

Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Article:Baseball_Notebook:_Player%27s_Union_Doesn%27t_Get_it_on_Bonds_Rejection"

This page was last modified 17:01, 7 May 2008. Content is available under the GFDL.

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise