armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan

About the Author

Panda Team
I'm mostly a football (soccer) fan, but last season I started playing fantasy NFL and really enjoyed it. If there's anything football-related you want me to write about, ask. And hey - if you work for some US publication and want a soccer writer, my rates are very reasonable... :)

More By Panda Team

Premiership INSANIA!!
3 votes, 3 comments
Premiership Preview - Chelsea
5 votes, 1 comment
Premiership Preview - Arsenal
12 votes, 6 comments
View All

Other recent voters

If you like the article, vote for it.
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Avram Grant is Barry Switzer - on Chelsea's problems

by Panda Team
created February 28, 2008, last edited February 10, 2009
9
Vote

The papers today are suggesting that Frank Rijkaard might be interested in the Chelsea job in the not-entirely-unexpected event of it becoming available, and the press have turned on Avram Grant now after their Carling Cup final defeat to Tottingham. So what's up at Chelsea and do they really have problems and aren't they alright really and how come they're not top when they're INSANELY RICH?

I think they've got genuine problems. To put that in prespective, there's only so far they can fall - their squad is one of the five best in the league in terms of talent and their players are strong-minded and used to winning titles. If I was suddenly made manager tomorrow they'd still be too good for teams like Wigan and Derby and Birmingham and Fulham.

In American Football (and, to be honest, I've no idea whether to write this for a UK or US audience, so you're both going to have to bear with me for the bits you already know, apologies) in the 90s the Dallas Cowboys had an amazing team built by a Head Coach called Jimmy Johnson, but after back-to-back superbowls JJ and the owner (er...who also has the intiials JJ), fell out. Johnson was sacked and a new man called Barry Switzer was put in charge. Reputedly, several senior players had no respect for Switzer, and he certainly never renewed the team and would never coach again in the NFL. Yet his Cowboys went 12-4 twice and won a superbowl, simply because of the abundant talent on the roster (after which they fell to 10-6 and then 6-10). The simliarities with Avram Grant are striking. Grant's CV doesn't warrant the job he now holds - previous roles were at Maccabi Haifa and the Israeli national job - and he's been put in place partly thanks to his good relationship with the club's heirarchy.

Chelsea's previous manager, Jose Mourinho, instilled an extraordinary tactical discipline in the side (partly by consistently substituting players who ignored instructions), and while it wasn't pretty to watch, it did mean that they were superbly effective in shutting opponents down (as when they beat Barcelona in the Champions League, and in last year's FA Cup Final which they won on pens after refusing ever to send more than 3 men ahead of the ball). They very rarely lost after getting a lead, as Chelsea did on Sunday. Under Grant, a manager tasked with making them more attacking, this discipline is gradually ebbing away. It's evident in the fact that Belletti is playing regularly (when he simply cannot defend, and can't be trusted one-on-one with any half-decent winger), and it was evident in the Carling Cup final on Sunday when Drogba failed to track Woodgate properly when he headed the winner. Chelsea's midfield used to play a ferocious high-energy pressing game when opponents got near their box, but it's slipping now. Makelele's legs have gone, and though Mikel is far more talented (and very strong on the ball) he's indisciplined and makes bad decisions. Add Ballack's occasional misdemeanors to the nasty streaks of Terry and Essien and Chelsea have also got too much volatility in the side, meaning that they will have problems with suspensions. Besides that, Robben was one of the most explosive and effective attackers in the league and Malouda has not been an adequate replacement (he looks fairly lightweight, and while his movement is good he rarely beats his man with the ball). Terry is paying now for his macho insistence on playing with minor injuries by getting lots more injuries, Ashely Cole is a shadow of his old Arsenal self and Man Utd and Arsenal have both found consistent, effective, settled sides. Grant's early results were good, but against a soft schedule that included Hull City and Rosenborg and most of the bottom half of the Prem - in games against Man Utd and Arsenal they've been comfortably beaten (more so than the score indicates). Despite all this, individual talent like Drogba and Anelka and Lampard and Joe Cole will win them games, but if they're anywhere near the final reckoning for the Prem or the Champions League this season I will be very surprised.

Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
A QQVarsity
622 days ago
Score 0+-
Yes i agree with you Panda Team, Grant is just a shadow of what Mourinho was.

See in a game there are rwo halves they say that the first half is called the "players half" so the players that have talent,stamina,strength and better mentality will of course take the lead, as seen because chelsea took the lead in the first half from a freekick taken by Drogba.

but the second half is called the "managers half" meaning the manager who viws the game fully and throughly and can change his tactic so he can win the game is better,no doubtly Ramos is a much more Experienced Coach so he was able to change his teams tactic and players in order to win the game,as grant couldnt....
Permalink | Reply
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
622 days ago
Score 0+-
Grant hasn't done badly at all. He's not lost or gained ground on the leaders since Mourinho departed.
Permalink | Reply
SSreportersLegend
622 days ago
Score 0+-
I think the problem is that. They haven't gained any ground and are still in danged of slipping out of the top 4. Also, Avram has beaten 0 of the big 3 in Arsenal, Liverpool, and Man Utd.
Permalink
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
622 days ago
Score 0+-
I don't think so though. Chelsea have a game in hand on the others in the top 4. If they win that, they're only 6 points behind Arsenal, and 3 from Manchester United. They're looking up, not down. Liverpool may not even make the Champions' League if they're not careful.
Permalink
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
622 days ago
Score 0+-
Chelsea have fewer goals than any of the top 6. That's their problem.
Permalink
Panda TeamWaterboy
622 days ago
Score 0+-
Alex; I agree that Chelsea haven't bombed in the league since Grant took over, but a) if you look at their schedule it's been pretty soft - Grant's best result has been beating Valencia away, and that club were clearly not in great shape as the manager went about a week after, b) I think that if you watch the way they play now it's nothing like as tight and effective as under Mourinho, when they VERY rarely lost leads and when they just ground away, and c) quite a few of their results have been deceptive - even on the highlights of their game vs the ferociously average Birmingham a couple of weeks ago Brum got plenty of chances and were unlucky to lose (as Liverpool were to draw). So I think their present wobble has been coming for a while - the sheer talent of players like Drogba (the Prem's most effective lone striker and an absolute beast), Anelka and Lampard will cover their problems in a good proportion of their games, but over a full season, and in the games against the very best I don't think it's going to be enough.
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free
Categories: Opinions | Opinions by User Panda Team | February 28, 2008 | February 2008 | Chelsea Opinions | Soccer Opinions | Barry switzer Opinions | Avram grant Opinions | EPL Opinions | Premiership Opinions

Don't Miss

Phillies World Series 2009: A Year Later, and They Still Don't Want Us
Sorry, But I'm Not Sorry
2009 NHL Preview
In Which Ricketts Wins World Series
2009 Week 3: Let’s Talk About Your Favorite NFL Team

In the News

Hey ArmchairGM users! Want to help the admins update this news section? Click here to help us out.

Comments of the Day

0 Because snooker is a sport... And sports are facking AWESOM...
0 i personally think this list has no validity. it does...
0 I don"t think money is the object here. Even if he...

Take a Poll

Did the world series go on in 1941 or was it canceled because of the war?
No Yes

New Articles

Week 10 Postgame: "Don't Want No Drama!"
The Silver Lining of a Gold Glove
From Ninth to First: What If the Red Sox Had Tony Conigliaro in October?
Baseball & Basketball losing it!
Whether James will leave the Cleveland Cavaliers or not?

Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Article:Avram_Grant_is_Barry_Switzer_-_on_Chelsea%27s_problems"

This page was last modified 10:37, 28 February 2008. Content is available under the GFDL.

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise