armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan

About the Author

Crackajg
The Resume

More By Crackajg

Fantasy Football 2009's Comatose Sleepers
13 votes, 7 comments
The Freudian Fumble Quiz: What Kind of Fantasy Football Personality Do You Have?
17 votes, 11 comments
Seventh Heaven: The Top Seven Fantasy Rookie Running Backs of 2009
5 votes, 0 comments
View All

Other recent contributors

Make this page better by editing it.

Other recent voters

If you like the article, vote for it.
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

A look back at the 2002 NFL Draft

by Crackajg
created May 04, 2008, last edited November 28, 2009
20
Vote

After writing my recent article about grading NFL team’s first few draft picks my thoughts were triggered by a statement by our very own, Afraid of Ed Hochuli:

This is why I don't think grades should happen until a few years down the road.

He was referring to how we give grades out on draft picks, but have absolutely no idea how they’ll turn out. Sure, we can predict what they’ll do. We can watch as much game tape and read as much stats as we want, but all we’re really doing is making an educated guess. We’re Nostradamusing the NFL Draft. Sometimes we’re right (See: Peyton Manning) and sometimes we are terribly, terribly wrong (See: Ryan Leaf).

So, I figured why not go back a couple of years and grade the drafts? I mean, I have a kid -- so my social life is effectively over, why not put my free time to good use?! I didn’t want to go back too long... about 5 years or so ago so that we have a better handle on where those picks are right now, in what should be the prime of their careers. More importantly, we can get a handle on how teams did selecting players and what those players contributed to the teams future.

Please note that although I will take into account how a player contributed to the team that drafted him, I will also take into account how that player did on other teams as well. The draft is all about scouting after all and the grades that follow are essentially a scouting mark based on the team's total number of picks and their overall performance.

First off, let’s get into some explanations of some statistics you‘ll be seeing (as if you couldn‘t figure it out on your own…):

Number of Pro Bowlers selected: Self-explanatory

Number of quality players selected: While I’m not going to completely define a ‘quality player’ or give term qualifying stats, let’s just say a quality player is someone who has had a fairly successful career since 2002 and is generally regarded as a good draft choice.

Number of busts (a.k.a. disappointments… let’s be nice): Selections within the first two rounds that a team wasted because they did not pan out at all for one reason or another.

Number of draft choices still actively playing in the NFL: The number of players selected that are still in the NFL and played in at least four games during the 2007 season.

Number of those choices still with the team that drafted them: Number of active draft choices who are still with the team that drafted them.

Number of quality late round picks: The number of players who are still doing or have made significant contributions and were selected in Round 4 or later.

Grades will take into account the preceding statistics as well as the intangibles, a la if the draft class had players who were key in a playoff or title run and the like. Since there was so much info I decided to break this up into three parts. Part one is the breakdown of the first ten teams’ drafts who selected in Round 1. Part two will be the next ten and part three will be, you guessed it, the final twelve teams. I wanted to do it all in one shot but it would have been way too big and I’m only human. As always, enjoy and feel free to discuss at length in the comments. Oh, and a special thanks to AOEH for giving me the idea for this in the first place.

First up, April 27th, 2002. The date of the 2002 NFL Draft and more importantly, the Houston Texans birthday!


Houston Texans: David Carr (QB), Jabar Gaffney (WR), Chester Pitts (OG), Fred Weary (OG), Charles Hill (DT), Jonathan Wells (RB), Jarrod Baxter (FB), Ramon Walker (S), Demarcus Faggins (CB), Howard Green (DT), Greg White (DE), Ahmad Miller (DT)

Number of Pro Bowlers: 0

Number of quality players selected: 5 (David Carr, Jabar Gaffney, Chester Pitts, Fred Weary, Demarcus Faggins)

Number of disappointments: 0

Number of draft choices still actively playing in the NFL: 5

Number of those players still with Houston: 3 (Chester Pitts, Fred Weary, Demarcus Faggins)

Number of quality late round picks: 1 (Sixth rounder: Demarcus Faggins)


Breakdown: 2002 was the Houston Texans inaugural year in the NFL and because of this they got the first pick in each of the first six rounds (not to mention some other picks thrown in for good measure). While 5 of their 12 selections went on to have successful careers, David Carr was not the QB they thought he would be when they drafted him. While he wasn’t a bust by any means, the Texans would go on and neglect to get him any offensive line help and he would be sacked 249 times in his 5 year stint with the Texans. But for 2002, their draft went quite well and three of the five quality selections they took are still with the team.


David 'I've been sacked more times than I've thrown a completion' Carr is labeled as a bust by some, but if he'd had a decent O-Line, who knows what he could have done.
David 'I've been sacked more times than I've thrown a completion' Carr is labeled as a bust by some, but if he'd had a decent O-Line, who knows what he could have done.


Grade: C +


Carolina Panthers: Julius Peppers (DE), Deshaun Foster (RB), Will Witherspoon (LB), Dante Wesley (CB), Randy Fasani (QB), Kyle Johnson (FB), Keith Heinrich (TE), Pete Campion (OG), Brad Franklin (CB)

Number of Pro Bowlers: 1 (Julius Peppers)

Number of quality players selected: 3 (Julius Peppers, Deshaun Foster, Will Witherspoon)

Number of disappointments: 0

Number of draft choices still actively playing in the NFL: 3

Number of those players still with Carolina: 1 (Julius Peppers)

Number of quality late round picks: 0

Breakdown: The Panthers hit a home run with their first round selection of Julius Peppers. Generally regarded as a “freak” because of his combination of strength, speed and his incredibly long arms, Peppers would go on to have a Pro Bowl career for the Panthers. Carolina’s next two selections, Deshaun Foster and Will Witherspoon would both play key roles in the Panthers 2003 championship push. Unfortunately, the Panthers lost the Super Bowl that year to the New England Patriots, but that doesn’t make their first three picks in the 2002 Draft any less impressive.

Grade: A -


Detroit Lions: Joey Harrington (QB), Kalimba Edwards (DE), Andre Goodman (CB), John Taylor (DE), John Owens (TE), Chris Cash (CB), Luke Staley (RB), Matt Murphy (TE), Victor Rogers (OT)

Number of Pro Bowlers: 0

Number of quality players selected: 3 (Joey Harrington, Kalimba Edwards, Andre Goodman)

Number of disappointments: 0

Number of draft choices still actively playing in the NFL: 4

Number of those players still with Detroit: 0

Number of quality late round picks: 1 (Fifth rounder: John Owens)

Breakdown: Joey Harrington’s four years in Detroit were marred by mediocrity. At times, he looked he may be the man to save Lions football, yet at other times he looked like he belonged in Arena football. However he at least showed he had potential and is still in the league, albeit with a career high 77.2 QB rating (2007 with the Falcons). Second round selection Kalimba Edwards, while not a blue chip or anything, did make contributions on defense. The rest of their selections, save for Andre Goodman, didn’t quite pan out in the long run.

Grade: D +


Buffalo Bills: Mike Williams (OT), Josh Reed (WR), Ryan Denney (DE), Coy Wire (SS), Justin Bannan (DT), Kevin Thomas (CB), Mike Pullico ( C ), Rodney Wright (WR), Jarrett Ferguson (RB), Dominique Stevenson (LB)

Number of Pro Bowlers: 0

Number of quality players selected: 1 (Josh Reed)

Number of disappointments : 1 (Mike Williams)

Number of draft choices still actively playing in the NFL: 5

Number of those players still with Buffalo: 3 (Josh Reed, Ryan Denney, Coy Wire)

Number of quality late round picks: 3 (Third rounder: Coy Wire, Fifth rounder: Justin Bannan, Seventh rounder: Mike Pullico)

Breakdown: First round selection Mike Williams just did not work out at all. While generally a good run blocker, he was not as skilled at pass blocking and was cut by the team three years after he was drafted. Any time a first round pick (not to mention a Top 5 one) doesn’t work out, it sets the team back immensely. Unfortunately for the Bills, the rest of their draft didn’t go as well, with Josh Reed being the only real contributor to the team.

Grade: D -


San Diego Chargers: Quentin Jammer (CB), Toniu Fonoti (OG), Reche Caldwell (WR), Ben Leber (LB), Justin Peele (TE), Terry Charles (WR), Matt Anderle (OT), Seth Buford (QB)

Number of Pro Bowlers: 0

Number of quality players: 4 (Quentin Jammer, Reche Caldwell, Ben Leber, Justin Peele)

Number of disappointments: 1 (Toniu Fonoti)

Number of draft choices still actively playing in the NFL: 4

Number of those players still with San Diego: 1 (Quentin Jammer)

Number of quality late round picks: 2 (Third rounder: Ben Leber, Fourth rounder: Justin Peele)

Breakdown: The Chargers had a very productive 2002 draft, with Quentin Jammer panning out to be the anchor of the secondary for the defense, Reche Caldwell proving to be a skilled receiver (but never a number one), Ben Leber starting many games at linebacker, and Justin Peele proving to be a competent pass catching number two TE. Second round pick Toniu Fonoti, while a skilled player had injury problems and off the field issues that limited his stay in San Diego to a mere two years. You can’t really penalize San Diego for not foreseeing these problems at the time of the draft, though.

Grade: B +

Kansas City Chiefs: Ryan Sims (DT), Eddie Freeman (DE), Omar Easy (FB), Scott Fujita (LB), Maurice Rodriguez (LB)

Number of Pro Bowlers: 0

Number of quality players: 1 (Scott Fujita)

Number of disappointments: 2 (Ryan Sims, Eddie Freeman)

Number of draft choices still actively playing in the NFL: 2

Number of those players still with Kansas City: 0

Number of quality late round picks: 1 (Fifth rounder: Scott Fujita)

Breakdown: While Ryan Sims was not necessarily a bust, he certainly didn’t put up the numbers that a defensive lineman taken in the Top 10 should. In five seasons with the Chiefs he only had 75 tackles, 5 sacks and 1 interception. I’m even being nice and counting assisted tackles. The remainder of the Chiefs picks didn’t bode quite well, either. With the exception of Scott Fujita all of Kansas City’s picks did nothing to improve the team in any way. To add insult to injury, Fujita left after his third season with the team, leaving them with nothing at all to show for the 2002 draft at this point in time.

Grade: F


Minnesota Vikings: Bryant McKinnie (OT), Raonall Smith (LB), Willie Offord (SS), Brian Williams (DB), Ed Ta’amu (OG), Nick Rogers (LB), Chad Beasley (OT)

Number of Pro Bowlers: 0

Number of quality players: 2 (Bryant McKinnie, Brian Williams)

Number of disappointments: 0

Number of draft choices still actively playing in the NFL: 3

Number of those players still with Minnesota: 1 (Bryant McKinnie)

Number of quality late round picks: 1 (Fourth rounder: Brian Williams)

Breakdown: The Vikings first round selection of Bryant McKinnie is perhaps my favorite selection in the entire 2002 draft. In addition to being a fantastic blocker, he’s also been an absolute workhorse. He’s started every single Minnesota Vikings game since 2003. Every single one. The Vikings appeared to like him too, giving him a 7 year, $48.5 million dollar deal. Hopefully, nothing will come of his recent legal troubles. While most of the other picks paled in comparison to the McKinnie selection, the Vikings did find another gem in the fourth round: Brian Williams. Although he is currently on the Jacksonville Jaguars, he’s started every game he’s been able to when he’s not been injured (save for his rookie year). Although he’s not there, the Vikings still got a solid 4 years out of him.


You could make a strong argument that Bryant McKinnie was the finest choice in the entire 2002 NFL Draft.
You could make a strong argument that Bryant McKinnie was the finest choice in the entire 2002 NFL Draft.


Grade: B +


Dallas Cowboys: Roy Williams (FS), Andre Gurode ( C ), Antonio Bryant (WR), Derek Ross (CB), Jamar Martin (FB), Pete Hunter (CB), Tyson Walter ( C ), Deveren Johnson (WR), Bob Slowikowski (TE)

Number of Pro Bowlers: 2 (Roy Williams, Andre Gurode)

Number of quality players: 3 (Roy Williams, Andre Gurode, Antonio Bryant)

Number of disappointments: 0

Number of draft choices still actively playing in the NFL: 2

Number of those players still with Dallas: 2 (Roy Williams, Andre Gurode)

Number of quality late round picks: 1 (Sixth rounder: Tyson Walter)

Breakdown: The Cowboys struck gold with their first two selections in the 2002 draft, selecting two eventual Pro-Bowlers. Roy Williams wouldn’t waste any time, being sent to the Pro Bowl in just his second year. It took Andre Gurode a bit longer but he is currently on back to back Pro Bowl nominations for 2006 and 2007. Antonio Bryant was looking like a solid selection as well until he violated the NFL’s substance abuse policy in 2006. They also found a gem (but not a starter, apparently) in Tyson Walter in the sixth round.

Grade: A


Jacksonville Jaguars: John Henderson (DT), Mike Pearson (OT), Akin Ayodele (LB), David Garrard (QB), Chris Luzar (TE), Clenton Ballard (DT), Kendall Newson (WR), Steve Smith (DB), Hayden Epstein (K)

Number of Pro Bowlers: 1 (John Henderson)

Number of quality players: 3 (John Henderson, Akin Ayodele, David Garrard)

Number of disappointments: 0

Number of draft choices still actively playing in the NFL: 3

Number of those players still with Jacksonville: 2 (John Henderson, David Garrard)

Number of quality late round picks: 2 (Third rounder: Akin Ayodele, Fourth rounder: David Garrard)

Breakdown: The Jaguars selection of John Henderson in Round 1 proved to be a great one, with Henderson becoming a 2 time Pro Bowlers in 2004 and 2006. He along with Marcus Stroud would ensure the Jaguars had one of the most feared defensive lines up until 2007. Third rounder Akin Ayodele would prove to be a workhorse linebacker and improved the Jaguars defense greatly while he was there. David Garrard wouldn’t get his time to shine until 2005 and would eventually be named the starting quarterback over Byron Leftwich. Garrard led the Jaguars to an 11-5 record and a wild card playoff victory over the Pittsburgh Steelers.


David Garrard is making the Jacksonville Jaguars scouting team look like geniuses.
David Garrard is making the Jacksonville Jaguars scouting team look like geniuses.


Grade: A -


Cincinnati Bengals: Levi Jones (OT), Lamont Thompson (FS), Matt Schobel (TE), Travis Dorsch (K), Marquand Manuel (S), Joey Evans (DE)

Number of Pro Bowlers: 0

Number of quality players: 3 (Levi Jones, Matt Schobel, Marquand Manuel)

Number of disappointments: 0

Number of draft choices still actively playing in the NFL: 4

Number of those players still with Cincinnati: 1 (Levi Jones)

Number of quality late round picks: 2 (Third rounder: Matt Schobel, Sixth rounder: Marquand Manuel)

Breakdown: The tenth overall selection of Levi Jones in the 2002 Draft has proved to be a smart one. Save for an injury plagued 2006 season, Jones has started 74 out of 80 possible games. He was also a large part of Rudi Johnson’s 4,000+ yards from 2004-2006 and it could even be said he was key in Rudi’s Pro Bowl bid in 2004 as well. While Lamont Thompson contributed, he was released after one year with the team. Matt Schobel put in some work from 2002-2005, racking up 938 yards and 9 touchdowns. Marquand Manuel has also played sporadically with both the Bengals and several other teams who needed secondary help.

Grade: C +

Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
SSreportersLegend
573 days ago
Score 2+-
Great article Crack. But how is Carr not a disappointment? He is a bust IMO whether or not he has all the time in the world.
Permalink | Reply
CrackajgDraft Pick
573 days ago
Score 2+-
I know a lot of people don't like QB rating but I'd rather cite that instead of all his statistics. His QB rating in Houston was 75.0 -- Yes, yes I know that's mediocre but had he gotten a decent offensive line during his time there, who knows what it could have been? I guess it all depends on how you define bust. To me, a bust is someone who completely fails at a football career or severely falls short of what was expected of them. There was a lot expected out of David Carr, but he can't be that bad -- he's still in the league.
Permalink
OvertheedgeVarsity
573 days ago
Score -3+-
SSR, he is a disappointment
Permalink
SSreportersLegend
573 days ago
Score -2+-
Thanks Jamel wannabe.
Permalink
SSreportersLegend
573 days ago
Score 1+-
Fair enough... But notice Carr is with the Panthers and is on the bench.
Permalink
CrackajgDraft Pick
573 days ago
Score 2+-
It's because of those Michael Jackson gloves. david-white-gloves-carr.jpg
Permalink
CrackajgDraft Pick
573 days ago
Score 0+-
I'd bench him, too.
Permalink
KelsdadAll-Star
573 days ago
Score 2+-
Nice job, Crack, and for what it's worth, I agree with you on Carr. Give him some protection and another option or two and he's a pretty decent QB.
Permalink | Reply
CrackajgDraft Pick
573 days ago
Score 0+-
Thanks, KD. Luckily for Carr, the Panthers are one of the best teams to be on with it's lack of a talented QB on the depth chart. If he just throws away those gloves...
Permalink
Taytay 24All-American
573 days ago
Score 2+-
Given his draft position, is "decent" good enough? Particularly since we are still talking about his potential? Isn't six years in the league a bit long to still be waiting on potential?
Permalink
CrackajgDraft Pick
573 days ago
Score 0+-
Not when he was sacked 250 times in five of those six years.
Permalink
CrackajgDraft Pick
573 days ago
Score 0+-
I get what your saying though, Tay. The guy's had his chance and I agree -- I wouldn't bet on him to succeed if you gave me free money. But I do think it's worth mentioning the fact that most of his time in Houston was spent trying not to get a concussion instead of completing passes.
Permalink
Taytay 24All-American
573 days ago
Score 2+-
Up until a year ago I would have agreed. But when he didn't do anything in Carolina either, I'm ready to call him a bust.
Permalink
CrackajgDraft Pick
573 days ago
Score 2+-
Okay I concede. I can't defend him anymore. Although I refuse to call him a 'bust'.
Permalink
CrackajgDraft Pick
573 days ago
Score 2+-
lg_leaf_ap.jpg Bust - (adjective) [Buh-st] - The characteristic of failing to meet even 1/10th of your career potential. (See: Leaf, Ryan)
Permalink
Taytay 24All-American
573 days ago
Score 1+-
No question that Leaf takes bust to a whole new level. But as a number one overall draft pick, especially at QB, "decent" isn't going to cut it.
Permalink
CrackajgDraft Pick
573 days ago
Score 1+-
Okay, very true. He should have been a star, but he wasn't. He did however, start 75 of a possible 80 games. Granted, Houston didn't win anything in the time frame but again, the team that was being built around Carr wasn't very good.
Permalink
Taytay 24All-American
573 days ago
Score 1+-
Agreed, although the case could be made that the offense wasn't that bad--he had a good RB and some good WRs in his time there. But overall, yes, the team was bad. And as I said before, until last year I would agreed that he wasn't a bust. But after un unproductive year in Carolina, you have to wonder: was he part of the problem in Houston, rather than just the victim of a bad team?
Permalink
CrackajgDraft Pick
573 days ago
Score 1+-
And that my friend is why opinions are a beautiful thing. ;)
Permalink
CrackajgDraft Pick
573 days ago
Score 1+-
Anyway, you've swayed me a bit -- I still refuse to call him a bust but it never registered in my mind that he was indeed the #1 draft pick. Does it warrant mentioning that he went to an expansion team? A la a team that was filled with rag-tag, don't really want them that bad players from other teams?
Permalink
Taytay 24All-American
573 days ago
Score 1+-
All number one draft picks go to bad teams--that's how they got the number one pick. The Colts were terrible when Manning was drafted. They, and he, turned out all right.
Permalink
CrackajgDraft Pick
573 days ago
Score 0+-
I'll give you that, but an expansion team is an entirely different animal. Whereas bad teams with the #1 suck, they at least have been around a while and barring absolutely horrific management/scouting should at least have some different strong points and/or bright spots on the roster. For instance: The Miami Dolphins this year sucked ass, no doubt -- but they have Ronnie Brown, who was at the top of the league in rushing before he went down with an injury. They also still have Jason Taylor, a perennial Pro Bowler and future Hall of Famer. You just don't get those type of guys in an expansion supplemental draft.
Permalink
CrackajgDraft Pick
573 days ago
Score 0+-
And Peyton was drafted into the horrible Colts, true -- but those horrible Colts also had a Marshall Faulk in his prime in the backfield.
Permalink
CrackajgDraft Pick
573 days ago
Score 0+-
Carr had Jonathan Wells to look forward to in the backfield. Not a horrible RB by any means, but he's never exceeded 600 rushing yards in a season. And Andre Johnson, the best receiver Carr got to play with in Houston had yet to arrive until 2003.
Permalink
Taytay 24All-American
572 days ago
Score 0+-
No doubt they were going to struggle his first year. But over the next five years, some good players were added. They still sucked, and Carr has to take some of the blame for that, especially after he did nothing in Carolina. He might make a decent journeyman backup for the rest of his career, but that's not good enough for a number one overall pick.
Permalink
CrackajgDraft Pick
573 days ago
Score 0+-
I'm impressed with how many live player links there are... I wasn't expecting this much. The only non-live ones seem to be most of the supplemental draft guys who never even played.
Permalink | Reply
Ccampbell34All-American
573 days ago
Score 2+-
Um sorry to break it to you guys, but David Carr signed with the Giants a little while ago
Permalink | Reply
SSreportersLegend
573 days ago
Score 0+-
The who?
Permalink
CrackajgDraft Pick
573 days ago
Score 0+-
You, sir... are correct -- I saw it earlier but completely forgot to register it in my brain.
Permalink
DRE-LOAAA-er
573 days ago
Score 0+-
This is something I've maintained for a long time. We can sit here and listen to Mel Kiper Jr all we want. but we can only really predict how a draft really went a few years after it happened.
Permalink | Reply
DRE-LOAAA-er
573 days ago
Score 0+-
By the way, I don't want David Carr anywhere near the field. Let Lorenzen and Woodson handle the backup duties.
Permalink | Reply
TheSportsAppleAll-American
572 days ago
Score 0+-
Agreed Dre. They have Anthony Wright on the roster too. One of them isn't going to make it. I bet Carr will though because they just signed him and because of how many games he's played in in his career.
Permalink
CheezerAll-Star
572 days ago
Score 4+-
Sorry CrackaJack. You have too many intangibles in your rating for my taste. It's obvious that you've put a lot of thought and effort into this article and I appreciate that, but I need more than just your subjective, inexpert opinion to take this is any more than conjecture.

"Grades will take into account the preceding statistics as well as the intangibles, a la if the draft class had players who were key in a playoff or title run and the like." The problem I have with this is that even your "statistics" are basically intangibles. It's all your opinion on whether the player is a bust or not (ie. Carr).

The fact that you cite "what-if" to prove your point is a pretty good indicator that the actual performance does not support your conclusions.

Let me close by saying that I understand the difficulty you must have had in creating your ratings. In the game of football, there is an incredible amount of interdependence with regards to player performance. Even clear cut statistics like completion percentage for a quarterback are dependent upon the ability of the receiver to catch the ball. Some receivers have better hands (better routes, better separation, etc.) than others and as a result, their QBs tend to have better statistics. At the same time, if a QB throws at the receiver's feet all the time, it makes his job more difficult.
Permalink | Reply
CrackajgDraft Pick
572 days ago
Score 1+-
Yeah I definitely see what your saying. It was meant more along the lines of having the reader make their own decisions based upon all the stats, players taken etc. I figured going on the record with my own grades would spur some discussion, debate and/or controversy that's never a bad thing! :P
Permalink
TrizzAll-American
572 days ago
Score 1+-
The Cowboys always have some of the best drafts...im surprised teams dont try to hire within that camp
Permalink | Reply
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
572 days ago
Score 0+-
Tim Couch, Akili Smith and Cade McCown can't wait until you do this for their draft class so they can explain what the term "Bust" means...
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #1
484 days ago
Score 0+-
You gave the Detroit Lions an A-. You sir, are a failure.
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free
Categories: Opinions | Opinions by User Crackajg | May 4, 2008 | May 2008 | NFL Opinions | 2002 NFL Draft Opinions | Crackajg Opinions | Sport Crack Opinions | Draft Grades Opinions | A Look Back Opinions

Don't Miss

Phillies World Series 2009: A Year Later, and They Still Don't Want Us
Sorry, But I'm Not Sorry
2009 NHL Preview
In Which Ricketts Wins World Series
2009 Week 3: Let’s Talk About Your Favorite NFL Team

In the News

Hey ArmchairGM users! Want to help the admins update this news section? Click here to help us out.

Comments of the Day

0 LaDanian Tomlinson (check the QB rating)
0 Only because the voters are facking stupid. "Numbers" are...

Play the Quiz Game

Who has the 2nd Longest Hitting Streak in MLB History?

New Articles

How Can Fred McGriff Not Be Elected to the Hall of Fame?
Best African-American Quarterback Ever?
Ken Caminiti: National League's 1996 MVP
Winter Olympics 2010
Highlights from Dubai 7's

Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Article:A_look_back_at_the_2002_NFL_Draft"

This page was last modified 04:55, 5 May 2008. Content is available under the GFDL.

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise