armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan

About the Author

NutKracker

More By NutKracker

Maple Leaf Hell
7 votes, 3 comments
My Blue Jays
12 votes, 33 comments
View All

Other recent contributors

Make this page better by editing it.

Other recent voters

If you like the article, vote for it.
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

A New NHL

by NutKracker
created June 25, 2009, last edited September 15, 2009
11
Vote

Certain sports revamp, restructure, improve, innovate, and update themselves, while some don't. Baseball has its purists, yet a time comes when change is necessary to remain sexy, viable, profitable, etc. We've seen the changes and tweaks to rules in the NFL, NBA, MLB, and NHL, yet the latter has a long way to come still. I've been a huge hockey fan for 25 plus years, however, I, myself, am getting bored of a drawn out season and playoff run that isn't epic anymore its just outright outplays its shine in a given calendar year. Hear me out. Of the 3 major sports that have best-of-seven series, only baseball remains a valid structure for playoff excitement.

The NBA, quite honestly, I'd rather see adopt a 60 game season with playoff one-and-dones like the NCAA tourney. Believe you me, I know the owners would never agree to foregoing so much booty from their treasure chests. Never. It would never happen. Understood. Just think of the excitement. Change the playoff format to a 24 team bracket and watch the fireworks. I know their are exceptions such as the Bulls/Celtics 7 game marathons of this year. Those are exceptions. Not guaranteed excitement. The '09 NBA Finals was a joke. A sad foregone conclusion. Not fun at all to observe as a fan unless you were a Laker fan, but how fun is that? We all know if KG didn't go down, it was to be a rematch of '08. NBA upsets are just too rare. Not so much in baseball or the NFL. In baseball, anything can happen. The variables and tangibles and intangibles are so numerous that it is really a true testament to the winning team that wins the World series. Spring training, 162 games, getting into the playoffs albeit via the WildCard which is genius in itself to revamp, LCS-semis, LCS and World Series.

This is an opinion and you won't win me over with a rebuttal. It's a conclusion I've come to after watching all the angles of BCS, March Madness, 7 game marathons, epic titles runs over the last 25 years of my sport watching career.

So, to the crux: hockey, a major league sport, yet it is easily supplanted (in terms of viewership, fan base, TV contracts and filthy-stinkin'-cash-moula-generating revenues) in the fall by college football, NFL and the World Series. In the new year overthrown by the BCS championship, NFL playoffs, NASCAR and March Madness, not to mention the murmur of spring training and at least for myself the dreaded NBA playoffs. On a side note, I'm not sure what I'm bored to death by the NBA Finals or the Stanley Cup playoffs due to sheer absurdity in playoff season length. Don't get me wrong I love overtime playoff hockey in a game 7 but its too much. With a best-of-seven in the NBA and NHL, teams can decide when to bring their A-game, how they want to win the series when the match-up is lopsided (home or away). It creates a personality disorder. A team shows up for game 2, Dr. Jekyll, a team tanks game 3, Mr. Hyde. What nonsense. Don't you expect only the best game in game out from the athletes you watch, indirectly pay and root for. The 7 game cushion allows for athletes to cruise every now and then and we've seen it more often than not from Hockey and Basketball playoffs.

Back to hockey. In essence the season needs to be scaled back to a 60 game season similar to the NBA recommendation. Let 20 teams get into the playoff round from each conference based on best records regardless of conference because in hockey on any given night you can be beat. Hence the first round upsets when seed #1 plays #8 every 3-4 years would disappear (as fun as that is its not generating large volumes of cash) otherwise why play 82 games to get crowned and pissed on 8 days later. With that 20 team pool generate a 10-team bracket that is based on best overall regular season record and let them spectate for 2 days. The bottom 10, make them duke it out in one and dones. Determined in a matter of 2 days so the 10 teams aren't waiting long. You don't earn the right to play in a 7 game series and generate all that revenue for sneaking into the playoffs. Hell no. Now you have 15. President's trophy winner gets a bye. Now re-seed 2-14 in a simple top vs bottom in a best of 3. The best of 3 has first 2 games back-to-back with a one day layoff between 2nd and 3rd game. So the current math is the #1 seed has had a 7 day layoff including 2 days between end of regular season and the start of 10 team one and dones to the conclusion of the best of 3. Remember by watching this carnage the trophy winner of the regular season knows that they can't sleep when their turn comes with a 1st round bye. They will be chomping on the bit because of the shortened slack for error. It actually forces the the trophy winner to bring their A-game so they aren't easily upset and have to suffer the humiliation.

The carnage from the best of 3 round leaves 7 so re-enter the president's trophy winner with a pool of 8. Seeded again based on original seeding. You are almost guaranteed 4 elite teams if not 6 with a couple of upsets along the way. Let the 8 war it out in an epic best of 5 game series. With the final four remaining, return to a best of 3 format. Force the teams to bring their A-game every time. In the final return to a best of 5. The lack of consistency in the format ensures teams, players, coaches don't sleep and decide to take a game off like the pens did in game 6 of this year's cup final. That's absolutely unacceptable in a finals.

You would have a hockey season done, champs crowned, parades completed in late April not sweltering June and you would re-invigorate a lost fan base. The excitement generated would swell TV viewership and TV revenue not to mention new mammoth league contracts from ESPN and/or CBS. More teams in the playoffs generates the excitement in the a weak fan base in the sunbelts. You awaken a giant derth of revenue lost to NASCAR and such. Nobody cares about the NHL because the season is too long and so many games are meaningless. Then add potential 28 game playoff season for your team its not really exciting. It maybe so when you're team is in the run but for the remaining millions out their, they're too busy on the golf links, planning family road trips and attending June weddings.

NHL Changes necessary to remain profitable.

--No touch icing --penalty for any physical contact along the boards including hits, grappling i.e. wrestling, obstructions (I saw way to many during dump-ins in the playoffs) this means the only hits and physical play allowed in hockey are clean open ice checks and it makes the game faster much faster and more skilled --50 game suspension immediately (no appeals, no league cases) for any direct or indirect blow to the head of a player by any part of your body during your motion to deliver a bodycheck. Period even if the hit is deemed legal from purists. Accidental skates, tumbles and falls and such are excluded. Not acceptable, zero-tolerance policy. It ensures that skill is maintained and players don't have their careers shortened without mentioning their lives. --Short season, short playoffs, new format guaranteed excitement and new vigor

That's my take to revive, renew and ensure that the NHL is healthy, viable, current, exciting and profitable for another 50-100 yrs. Less is more. Less is more.


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
CheezerAll-Star
136 days ago
Score 2+-
Nice take. Not sure about the seeding idea, but I agree that he playoffs are too long. Potentially 28 games to get the Cup. I'd recommend the elimination of one round and switch the to a five and two sevens games series. That would never happen ($$$).

Not sure if you noticed, but game 7 between the Wings and Pens had the highest TV ratings in 36 years of NHL playoffs.
Permalink | Reply
Pittsburgh GunnyMajor Leaguer
136 days ago
Score 3+-
A. There is no way that the NHL or NHLPA would cut back the number games. The loss of revenue would cut the salary cap thereby cutting salaries.


B. I am soooooooooo glad the NHL is not on ESPN, I despise that network where sports journalism died many many years ago. I do not watch espn for my sporting news and if you are not an NHL fan than that's your loss, I don't really care.
C. Best of five series suck balls. This season's NHL playoffs were tremendous don't "fix" what ain't broke.

D. I don't really watch the NBA or MLB so I really do not care what they do, if what they do makes their fans happy then great. The NHL is fine the only thing that may help it out is if they can finally get a team in Toronto.
Permalink | Reply
CheezerAll-Star
136 days ago
Score 2+-
The NHL second season, 28 game playoffs, is extremely long. The ice gets terrible in warm weather cities.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
136 days ago
Score 0+-
I would definitely support shortening the regular season to 50 or 60 games. And this will NEVER happen. It's one of the few things both the owners and players can agree on.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
136 days ago
Score 3+-
I think the playoffs are the best thing the NHL has going this side of the Winter Classic. They get decent ratings (if on a real TV station), the games are extremely exciting. I think the NHL's playoff system rewards effort and hard play more than any of the other leagues, where raw talent is much more of a determining factor.


I don't think rewarding byes is a good idea (plus it would lead to rusty teams, having to wait 2 weeks to play). I think 16 total teams is enough. Best of 7 is perfect, not too, long not too short.


Of all the things about the NHL I'd like to see changed, the playoffs is on the bottom of the list, if on it at all.
Permalink | Reply
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
136 days ago
Score 2+-
But I would like to see an exhibition series between the Stanley Cup Champions, and the best team in Europe.
Permalink
Pittsburgh GunnyMajor Leaguer
136 days ago
Score 2+-
As would I Rawb. It is possible that the Victoria Cup may be that trophy. Right now the 2009 version, the 2nd overall, will be between the current Champions League winners ZSC Lions (Switzerland) and Chicago Blackhawks.


The first Victoria Cup was won by the New York Rangers prior to the start of last season when the beat Metallurg Magnitogorsk, winners of the final edition of the European Champions Cup.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
136 days ago
Score 0+-
Well there's bound to be a European Superleague in a few years. Take the two champs and have them play in London. It'll be sick.
Permalink
LASportsblogAAA-er
136 days ago
Score 1+-
How fun was it to see the Lakers win? Are you KIDDING me? It was the single best thing that happened in the last 2 years! Well until US/Spain. But that's another discussion.

Basketball should cut to 62 games from 82 and keep the playoff format the same. People enjoy the NBA Playoffs for the most part (Expect in Pittsburgh) and are only burned out because they have to suffer through watching their team play Minny or the Bucks or Washington 4 times a year.

As for the NHL, turn it on it's head, it's rubbish in it's current structure and has much more potential for interest and excitement....first I have to find it on my T.V. when it's not scheduled head-to-head with the NBA... dumb ass Gary Bettman
Permalink | Reply
Pittsburgh GunnyMajor Leaguer
136 days ago
Score 0+-
Exception noted and well spotted LASportsblog.
Permalink
LASportsblogAAA-er
136 days ago
Score 2+-
=D thanks Gunny. Like Rawbee and Sport Crack and them last season, I don't care if the Finals is a rout if my team is at the top! lol
Permalink
Steel TownDraft Pick
135 days ago
Score 6+-
first I have to find it on my T.V.


This annoys me so much. It is lazy journalism or opinion making. How stupid does one have to be to not be able to find a channel on their TV. YOU CAN SEARCH on your TV just like a computer. And I don't know about the rest of you, but VS is located with all of the other sports channels with my cable provider. Just because you haven't looked for it doesn't mean you can't find it.
Permalink
Pittsburgh GunnyMajor Leaguer
135 days ago
Score 1+-
Steel Town, that was just poetry to my ears.
Permalink
LASportsblogAAA-er
135 days ago
Score 0+-
Steel Town, read the deeper meaning of what you quoted

first I have to find it...

the fact I'm not already looking for it means I'm clearly not a regular NHL fan, rather a "casual fan" in the target demo. Well we have Sid and Malkin vs. Hockey's best franchise and how many TV ads did I see for it?

None.

While I was bombarded with NBA ads day and night. I found the finals because they found me. Hockey doesn't try to find the casual fan and then they put their finals head to head with a superior marketed league.

Where are the Sid the Kid and Malkin puppets? Where are the major advertisers with NHL player endorsements?

I can't find it cause they can't find me.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
135 days ago
Score 2+-
I know people who can find where Versus is on their TV, but only get a black screen when they switch to it because they don't get Versus.


I know many hate ESPN, but be honest, Versus does NOTHING to help the NHL grow.
Permalink
SSreportersLegend
135 days ago
Score 1+-
Joe Beninati.


Game over.


Versus does a piss poor job of covering hockey. I actually want ESPN to air the games again.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
136 days ago
Score 3+-
More teams in Arizona and Nashville is the answer.
Permalink | Reply
LASportsblogAAA-er
136 days ago
Score 2+-
Yes! We could put one here in the East Valley! Like the Mesa Gila Monsters. Then we could put a third team in So Cal, I'm thinking the San Diego County Mariners. Then, we could put teams in other places it never snows or gets cold like Orlando, Charleston SC, Waco TX, etc. etc.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
136 days ago
Score 0+-
Mexico City.
Permalink
Pittsburgh GunnyMajor Leaguer
136 days ago
Score 2+-
eff M*x*c*.
Permalink
DeutscherRed-Shirting
136 days ago
Score 3+-
You cant suspend a guy 50 games with no appeal process for something like a head shot. Its very subjective to as what was happening at the time where are his feet how tall is he? How tall was the opponent. Pronger would play one game then be out 50, not that its a bad thing to pick on Pronger. Take away 20 or so regular season games and you may as well pack up half the league and call it quits. Where in the hell do you think they make their money from? TV? Merch? Beer? (maybe) no its ticket sales and yeah while you may be adding to the amount of teams making the playoffs you are making everyone across the board well, poor.


Come NHL playoff time what do you hear the most? All those stupid talking heads on the sports radio and what not all stop and nod in agreement that while they may not watch the NHL regular season they all pay attention come playoff time. Its an ironman tourney of epic proportions that is unequalled in any sport. (Except the NFL, always the NFL but really sometimes those games are a bust like really lets be fair)They just need to speed it up and get it done before June 1 and its golden. How about everyone just take a breath and leave the NHL alone there's no reason to fix it, its not broken its just run by a.....well lets just leave it at that.
Permalink | Reply
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
136 days ago
Score 3+-
I don't think the NHL's broken, just that it could use some tinkering. But the playoffs are just about perfect the way they are.


The only thing I'd change is the way the NHL has a "cause" every year (this year was "no message sending") and it backs down at the first chance to enforce it.
Permalink
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free
Categories: Opinions | Opinions by User NutKracker | June 25, 2009 | June 2009 | NHL Opinions | MLB Opinions | NBA Opinions | NFL Opinions

Don't Miss

Phillies World Series 2009: A Year Later, and They Still Don't Want Us
Sorry, But I'm Not Sorry
2009 NHL Preview
In Which Ricketts Wins World Series
2009 Week 3: Let’s Talk About Your Favorite NFL Team

In the News

The Detroit Red Wings defeated the San Jose Sharks 2-1 ending their winning streak at six.

Comments of the Day

2 I don"t follow baseball and even I would recommend the swi...

Take a Poll

Would you boycott a game with a player who had been caught cheating on the roster?
Yes No

New Articles

Week 9 Postgame: Trick or Treat?
Dear FIFA, UEFA, & Football Fans... It is time.
Make it Number 27
Baseball players
Intercepted Season(s)

Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Article:A_New_NHL"

This page was last modified 21:38, 25 June 2009. Content is available under the GFDL.

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise