armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan

About the Author

Tmutchell

More By Tmutchell

Harold Baines for the Hall of Fame?
4 votes, 0 comments
Problems in Projecting C.C. Sabathia: The $140 Million Question
6 votes, 0 comments
Red Sox Pursuing Junichi Tazawa
2 votes, 0 comments
View All

Other recent contributors

Make this page better by editing it.

Other recent voters

If you like the article, vote for it.
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

2008 National League Awards

by Tmutchell
created October 02, 2008, last edited February 10, 2009
7
Vote

Well, this will be too late to preempt the NL and AL Comeback Player of the Year awards.

If you're interested, you can read my pick for the American league here.

The NL award went to the Philadelphia Phillies' Brad Lidge, who went 41-for-41 in save opportunities while posting a 1.95 ERA in 69 innings. This came a year after blowing 8 Saves in 27 chances with the Houston Astros last year, so it's seen as a major turnaround, I guess. I disagree. I think Lidge's real turnaround was from 2006 to 2007. He went 1-5 with a 5.28 ERA that year, even though he did save 32 games.

Image:Brad lidge.png

Christian Guzman, who hit .316 in 579 ABs after playing only 46 games last year, or Jorge Cantu would have been better choices. Cantu hit .277/29/95 with 41 doubles and 92 Runs after hitting a combined .252 with one homer in 52 games for Tampa and Cincy in 2007. Now that's a comeback! Ryan Dempster would have been a better choice, too, for going 17-6 with a 2.96 ERA in 200+ IP after several years of relieving, and not always well. Cantu would have been my pick, though.

Now on to the ones they haven't already named...

NL Most Valuable Player

An Albert Pujols love poem to the National League might read as follows:

How do I lead thee? Let me count the ways.

I lead thee in the depth and breadth and height

My bat can reach, to hit balls out of sight!

For though I seconded in the batting race,

I lead thee in runs created, times on base.

I lead in OPS, by sun and candle-light.

I lead thee in VORP, without much of a fight;

I lead thee in total bases and slugging,

I lead thee in walks intentional, just for fun,

I lead thee in percent, offensive winning,

In RCAA, adjusted batting runs,

In batting wins, though by threads my elbow's hanging.

I lead thee in WARP, the best I've ever done.

I shall but lead next year in everything.

Albert Pujols is, far and away, the best player in the National League, and it's not even close. Besides the stuff I could rhyme, he also led the league in EqA, RC/27 Outs, BB/AB, K/W, Fielding Percentage, Range Factor, Zone Rating, RZR and Double Plays Turned (for his position). In case you were wondering.

Image:05PujolsAlbert01.jpg

Discussions of Ryan Howard (because he leads in Homers and RBI) are laughable. The man also made 475 Outs, more than all but half a dozen men in the Senior Circuit. Chipper Jones was nearly as good as Pujols, with the bat if not the glove, but he played 20 fewer games. David Wright and Lance Berkman both had great years, but they're on a whole different plane from Pujols. Nobody else is even worth discussing, and for that matter, neither are these guys, but somebody's going to ask, so I figured I'd get this out of the way.

NL Cy Young Award

There are three main candidates for this award: Tim Lincecum, Johan Santana, and Brandon Webb. Santana leads the NL in innings pitched (by 7 over Cole Hamels) and ERA (by 0.09 over Lincecum). Lincecum leads in strikeouts, by 59(!) over Santana and Edinson Volquez, as well as Adjusted ERA (164 to 163 over Santana), K/9IP, and Hits/9IP. Also wild pitches, which admittedly does not help his case, but I thought I should mention it.

Image:Ac61ae03-6517-4830-942b-95bc2ce581c6 mn.jpg

He should lead in winning percentage, too, but they don't count innings for that, just decisions, so his 18-5 record is just barely edged out by Adam Wainright's 11-3, even though he tossed only 132 innings. Amazingly, C.C. Sabathia tossed 130 innings and went 11-2, but he's not listed there, so I guess the cutoff is 14 decisions. Sabathia, despite pitching only half the season in the NL, leads it in complete games (7) and shutouts (3 - tied with Ben Sheets). He also leads the majors with 253 innings, though he can't lead either league.

There's been some talk of C.C. getting the award, like Rick Sutcliffe did in 1984 when he was traded to the Cubs in mid season and won 16 games for them, but he went 16-1 in 150 innings, much gaudier than 11-2. And besides, that was an awful decision. Rick Rhoden and Dwight Gooden were both much more valuable than Sutcliffe had been that year. So were Rick Mahler and Larry McWilliams, for that matter. Let's not repeat the mistake.

Webb leads in wins, with 22, four more than Lincecum, his next closest rival. Sadly, many of the BBWAA voters still pay too much attention to this stat. There's just no precedent for a guy leading the league with 20+ wins, without anyone else close to him, and not winning the CYA, unless it goes to a reliever or something, and, with all due respect to Brad Lidge, there's nobody in the NL who's a viable candidate for that.

Bartolo Colon won it in 2005 with a 21-8 record, despite the fact that it was a demonstrably inferior performance to that of Johan Santana, who went 16-7, just like this year. Roger Clemens over Roy Oswalt in 2004 isn't quite the same, as there was only a 2-win difference, plus a 6-Loss difference. Webb's 22-7 looks a lot better than 20-10.

Image:Example HipsRotatingBeforeShoulders TimLincecum 2007 035.jpg

My vote would be for Lincecum, partially because in allowing fewer hits and striking out more batters, he did a lot more of his own laundry than Santana, but Santana would hardly be an undeserving candidate. If a precedent can be set to give the award to the best pitcher instead of the guy with the most W's next to his name, this is the year. My guess is that Webb wins his second CYA by a nose.

Rookie of the Year

There are quite a few candidates for this one, too. Chicago Cubs' catcher Geovany Soto is the most likely candidate, a rookie catcher who helped the team to the playoffs, hitting 23 homers and driving in 86 while playing impressive defense. He finished the season with an NL-rookie-leading 39.4 VORP and 7.0 WARP.

The Cincinnati Reds' Joey Votto is the only other hitter in the discussion, as he led the NL rookie field in all four of the 3-digit stats, AVG, OBP, SLG, and OPS, hitting .297/.368/.506/.874 with 24 homers, which also led all rookies. He also led in games played (151) hits, and at-bats. His 6.6 WARP was pretty close to Soto's, as was his 34 VORP.

The Atlanta Braves' pitcher Jair Jurrjens deserves some mention, as his 188 IP, 13 wins and 3.68 ERA led all NL rookies. Hiroki Kuroda was nearly as good, but won't get much attention because of his modest 9-10 record. No other rookie won more than 9 games or saved more than 7, so there's really nobody else to discuss.

My vote would be Soto, Votto, Jurrjens, in that order, and I suspect that for once the BBWAA will agree with me.


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
417 days ago
Score -1+-
How are you calculating outs? Ryan Howard = 610 AB, 153 hits, 81 walks. 610-153=457. 457-81=376. I'm sure I'm missing something. Where do the added 99 outs come from?


I don't think Howard is such a laughable choice. He was 5th in the voting last year, and he has more runs, hits homers and RBI than last year. And the same number of Ks. So it seems reasonable to assume that the same voters that overlooked the 199 Ks last year will do so again.


These voters might take into account his 11 homers, 32 RBI, .352 avg, .852 SLG and 1.274 OPS in September.


Pujols? 8 homers, 27 RBI, .321 avg, .702 SLG and 1.129 OPS in Sepetember. And no postseason play. Pujols is great, but people have short memories. Howard's September was very good.


And consider this: Would the Phils be in the playoffs without Howard? Probably not. Would the Cardinals be watching the playoffs without Pujols? Most likely.


Pujols is great and deserving of all the accolades he gets. But this unilateral dismissal of Howard as a legit MVP candidate is just nonsense. He'd get my vote.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #1
405 days ago
Score 0+-
Nice job trying to figure out Howard's outs SJ. The 610 ABs already have the 81 walks "subtracted" from them. You get ZERO ABs for a walk. It's Pujols and it's not even close.
Permalink
KelsdadAll-Star
417 days ago
Score 0+-
Howard was MVP of the month for September, for the year, not close. And the first three and a half months of the season, Howard was one of the WORST players in the league.
Permalink | Reply
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
417 days ago
Score 0+-
I'm also not necessarily arguing that Howard is/should be the MVP. I'm just saying that dismissing him outright is nonsense. He's going to get votes. And he will likely be in the top five of the vote-getters. This does not qualify as 'laughable' to me.
Permalink
KelsdadAll-Star
417 days ago
Score 0+-
Howard did make 475 outs this season
Permalink | Reply
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
417 days ago
Score 0+-
Not that it's your argument, but 2007 MVP Rollins made 527 outs.
Permalink
RomiezzoLegend
417 days ago
Score 1+-
That's true. However, you're talking about two very different players here. One guy, Jimmy Rollins, basically led his team to the playoffs from the very start. He played great defense (unlike Howard), and was a 30-30 man. Not only that, but he stepped up when Chase Utley was injured for a whole month, and was (in many people's eyes) the main reason why the Phillies got into the playoffs, winning the division on the last day... Ryan Howard, on the other hand, did well only during the second half of the season. Chase Utley did well during the first half, but then slowed down, which was the main reason (besides better pitching) that the Phillies were doing so good. A lot of people were saying, "Chase for MVP". That was until he started cooling down, and Howard started firing up. To be honest, I don't really see a guy who is mediocre on defense, a bad contact hitter, and a player who did well for half the season win the MVP... even if he does lead the league in homers and RBIs.
Permalink
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
417 days ago
Score 0+-
Romi, well argued. Thank you for at least acknowledging that a point was made. I will pull for Howard and be disappointed if he doesn't win. But that's because he's a Phillies guy.


Now I'm just enjoying the postseason!
Permalink
Tmil42AAA-er
417 days ago
Score 2+-
Howard shouldn't win because Pujols' batting average (.357) is 18 points higher than Howard's OBP (.339)
Permalink | Reply
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
417 days ago
Score 1+-
Again, I'm not necessarily arguing that Howard is/should be the MVP. I'm just saying that dismissing him outright is nonsense. He's going to get votes. And he will likely be in the top five of the vote-getters. This does not qualify as 'laughable' to me.


58 homers, 146 RBI (11 and 32 just in September) are not numbers that voters will throw out.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
416 days ago
Score 2+-
The argument made for Howard has been, while he is batting .250 (or so), the guy produced more runs than anyone else...

Its definitive value to me...

Besides MVP doesn't mean your the best player in the league. in 2007, do you believe Jimmy Rollins was the best player in the league?
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #2
416 days ago
Score 1+-
Although Howard had a 'poor' first half, remember that he led the majors in HRs and the NL in RBIs at the All-Star break. He was also the first player with those credentials to be left off an All-Star team since 1948....Define 'poor'. Lou From Philly
Permalink | Reply
KelsdadAll-Star
416 days ago
Score 3+-
Howard won his first MVP based on a hot six week end of the season, Justin Morneau won his for the same reason. Hot second halves carry more weight with voters than a big first half, which is why Utley and Josh Hamilton will not win. The best players this year came from non-playoff teams...Pujols, Berkman, Chipper, Adrian Gonzalez, Wright, etc. Howard likely will receive support, much more so than he deserves because of a lack of solid candidates.
Permalink | Reply
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
416 days ago
Score 0+-
This is more or less what I've been saying. Although I think he is more deserving than you think. When will they make the announcement on this?
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
416 days ago
Score 0+-
The voting is already done, the awards (Manager of the Year, RoY, CY, MVP) get announced one day at a time starting afew days after the World Series so they can create arguments, hold banquets for the fat asses and baseball lifers and extend baseball into the minds of people all the way into the winter meetings.
Permalink
KelsdadAll-Star
416 days ago
Score 0+-
Ballots just went out on Wednesday, how can the voting be done?
Permalink | Reply
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
416 days ago
Score 0+-
Come on, KD... you've been around a long time, you know the drill. Voting is ALWAYS completed before the playoffs begin. It's REGULAR season awards and the playoffs are to bear NO sway.

And the ballots usually go out when there's a week left on the schedule because someone ALWAYS bitches about it. Just like they do in the NBA as well.

The ballots were DUE on Wednesday.
Permalink
KelsdadAll-Star
416 days ago
Score 0+-
That explains why Matt Holliday didn't get the MVP last year, the writers didn't consider his last ten games because they had already returned their ballots.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #3
387 days ago
Score 1+-
No Holliday didn't win in 2007 because everybody realized that his numbers were greatly influenced by his home park. If you look at his home/away split, you see amazing stats at Coors Field, and good (but by no means great) stats on the road. Rollins had an amazing year and did something that is rarely seen these days (20-20-20-20 / 2Bs-3Bs-HRs-SBs AND 30-30 / HRs/SBs).
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #3
387 days ago
Score 0+-
PS : I don't root for the Phillies. And *HE* was the spark of his team for quite a bit in 2007, especially the run to the playoffs. Was he the *only* guy that deserved MVP scrutiny? Nope - but he DID deserve the award (as did a few other people - but only one can get it).
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free
Categories: Opinions | Opinions by User Tmutchell | October 2, 2008 | October 2008 | MLB Opinions | New York Mets Opinions | Philadelphia Phillies Opinions | Milwaukee Brewers Opinions | Chicago Cubs Opinions | Baseball Opinions | San Francisco Giants Opinions | Tim Lincecum Opinions | Brandon Webb Opinions | Johan Santana Opinions | Arizona Diamondbacks Opinions | Albert Pujols Opinions | St. Louis Cardinals Opinions | Houston Astros Opinions | Lance Berkman Opinions | David Wright Opinions | Jorge Cantu Opinions | Brad Lidge Opinions | Christian Guzman Opinions | Washington Nationals Opinions | Florida Marlins Opinions | Ryan Dempster Opinions | Ryan Howard Opinions | Chipper Jones Opinions | Atlanta Braves Opinions | Adam Wainwright Opinions | Rick Sutcliffe Opinions | Dwight Gooden Opinions | Joey Votto Opinions | Jair Jurrjens Opinions | Hiroki Kuroda Opinions | Rick Rhoden Opinions

Don't Miss

Phillies World Series 2009: A Year Later, and They Still Don't Want Us
Sorry, But I'm Not Sorry
2009 NHL Preview
In Which Ricketts Wins World Series
2009 Week 3: Let’s Talk About Your Favorite NFL Team

In the News

Hey ArmchairGM users! Want to help the admins update this news section? Click here to help us out.

Comments of the Day

0 +++++
0 Why will you get trashed for stating the obvious truth? &...
0 this is a really cool list. i like the idea of using ...

Play the Picture Game

Better Tongue

New Articles

Allie Reynolds' Amazing 1952 World Series
Manning vs. Brady
Enough of the SHEEEEET Talk
I can't believe how close-minded people are regarding the Belichick call!
Giants Showing Interest in Uggla, Damon

Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Article:2008_National_League_Awards"

This page was last modified 19:48, 2 October 2008. Content is available under the GFDL.

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise