armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

A Tough Game To Watch, Made Tougher

11
Vote

by user Lenora X

Shut Up.

Michael Kay is perhaps the most infuriating announcer in professional sports. I realize there is a lot of competition, but for Me Kay's aggressive stupidity, his refusal to let go of a "point," no matter how many different ways it is shown to be wrong and/or irrelevant, and his inability to stop doing radio even though he's been on TV for five years now, give him the crown.

Last night Kay was in rare form, even for him.

Pettitte couldn't hold a big lead and was taken out without being able to get the win. Now, in a situation like this . . . the scoring rules are clear. Edwar Ramirez came in, and by the time he left the Yankees had been tied, and then gone ahead again. Ramirez was thus in line to get the win if the score held.

Now there is one exception. If, in the opinion of the official scorer, the reliever who would technically be in line for the win was "brief and ineffective," the scorer can award the win to another pitcher.

It's very rare that that happens. And while there is no strict definition of "brief and ineffective," it's generally assumed that's it really brief and really ineffective, like . . . 1/3 of an inning and four runs allowed. Ramirez wasn't great last night but was nowhere near brief and ineffective -- 1-1/3 innings, one run allowed. Yet Kay several times said that Ramirez was in line for the win but that it would be up to the official scorer. Does he really not know, after all these years, that there was basically zero chance of Ramirez not getting the win?

Infuriating. Aggressively stupid.


Shut Up Shuttin' Up.

But Kay was in rare form already last night. When Ramirez came into the game, he talked about Ramirez' changeup, calling it a "Bugs Bunny changeup."

The reference comes from a Bugs Bunny cartoon in which Bugs is pitching and throws his special pitch, a very slow pitch at which the hitter swings three times and strikes himself out. It's a classic, but if you're going to talk about in on a baseball telecast, you have to have all the facts, namely, what the pitch was actually called.

Say it with me, Michael: The Paralyzin' Palooka Pitch.

Maybe it's sad that I know that, I don't know. But Kay has to know it if he's going to talk about it on TV. Calling it the "Bugs Bunny Changeup" is lame, and sad. And of course in typical Kay fashion, he mentions it over and over. Then to complete the self-humiliation he explains the reference! "For those of you who don't know what I'm talking about, there was a Bugs Bunny cartoon . . . "

Stop, Michael, please. Just . . . stop.


And A Special "Shut Up" To The Rules and The Scoring Rules.

Two little odd things from last night. One from the game, one from the box score.

Cano apparently missed third base en route to scoring on Cairo's gapper and was called out when Anaheim appealed. The appeal play last worked in 1967, I think. It's time to take it out of the rules. If the guy left too early, or missed the base, have some guts and make it the umpire's job to call it. A system whereby the other team's mistake/cheating gets penalized only if you notice it, is ridiculous. What are umpires for?

The second thing is that in looking at the box score I see that Edwar Ramirez, in addition to getting the win last night, gets tagged with a Blown Save.

In the sixth inning?

Not that it matters except I suppose in arbitration hearings, but there should be no blown saves given out prior to the eighth inning. Too much can still happen.


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
ApriscoWaterboy
875 days ago
Score 1+-
You hit on a couple of things that drive me crazy. First off, the win should be an official scorer's decision period. Let's say that Pettitte pitch 7 scoreless innings and the games is tied at zero. He leaves and Ramirez gives up two runs in an inning but then the Yanks score three in the bottom of the inning. Ramirez will get the win, and you are right, the "brief and ineffective" rule almost never gets used. That is stupidity. And it is a big part fo the reason why wins have become almost meaningless. Second, the blown save is given out anytime a relief pitcher gives up the lead at any point in the game, ridiculous. Is anyone checking the blown saves of middle relief pitchers. Clearly, it only matters with regard to the closer.
Permalink | Reply
JCantRootWaterboy
875 days ago
Score 1+-
Hey. Big Bugs Bunny fan here and you blew the pitch name yourself. It the "powerful, paralyzing, perfect, pachydermous percussion pitch" and Bugs uses it to paste a pathetic palooka. Other than that - great job - I hate Michael Kay too.
Permalink | Reply
Lenora XWaterboy
875 days ago
Score 1+-
Thanks. I was off on the name, it appears. Serves me right for not looking first. As for Kay, I just scratched the surface. I could write 20 columns on how horrible he is but that would get boring, I'm afraid. I think My favorite though, is when Kay screams "GONNA BE A TOUGH PLAY!!!!" and the guy is then thrown out by three steps at first. The man simply won't stop doing radio. I think he learned a lot of bad habits from John Sterling, truthfully.
Permalink
Moritz WollertWaterboy
874 days ago
Score 0+-
You gave me some nice laughs, good job!
Permalink | Reply
MegECass110AAA-er
874 days ago
Score 0+-
Michael Kay is pretty awful (and I would still say that if I wasn't Red Sox fan), but I would put Joe Morgan ahead of him. ESPN shouldn't even call him an analyst, because he contributes close to nothing to the broadcast. Morgan is worse by a nose.
Permalink | Reply
Lenora XWaterboy
874 days ago
Score 0+-
Tough call. Morgan (and John Miller) are both pretty horirble. I'll be talking about them soon -- maybe after tonight, depending upon how many gems they produce during the bradcast.
Permalink
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/A_Tough_Game_To_Watch%2C_Made_Tougher"

This page was last modified 20:04, 7 July 2007. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise