armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

A Lesson in Running Up the Score

20
Vote

by Corey Kempf

What do you know? The New England Patriots won by 46 again this past Sunday.

Do I at least seem surprised?

In a scene that's becoming all too familiar in the NFL this year, the Patriots are dominating, destroying and degrading their opponents at an alarming rate, chewing them up and spitting them out like a piece of bubble gum that loses its flavor within five minutes. And that's just the first half.

But the Patriots' preeminence has sparked and, with each passing week, fueled a raging firestorm of backlash from New England to the West Coast. And while these cries of foul continue to ring out across the NFL landscape, one has to wonder if Bill Belichick hired some sound engineer to create his hoodies to withstand the uprising, like a stone castle surrounding its king, oblivious to the helpless, revolutionist peasants trying futilely to breach the gate.

"Score-board! Score-board!"
"Score-board! Score-board!"

Monday through Saturday, the debates continue, with the football purists protesting that the Patriots are ruining the integrity of the game while showing not an ounce of sportsmanship or class in the process. But on Sunday, Belichick stalks the sidelines, ordering an all-out aerial offensive from his arsenal, an assemblage of weapons comparable only to the Israeli Air Force.

But is Belichick really that evil? To answer, we must complete a small, mostly recent, history lesson.

Earlier this year, on October 30 to be exact, the Smith Center (Kan.) High School football team scored 72 points in the first quarter of a first round playoff game against Plainville High on their way to an 86-0 win.

At the time, Smith Center was 9-0 with every single one of their victories coming by way of a shutout. In fact, they had outscored their opponents 640-0 and hadn't punted once. But the coach insists the team had no intentions of piling up such lopsided scores.

"I didn't think it was nearly as entertaining as some folks did," said Head Coach Roger Barta in an interview with ESPN's Wayne Drehs. "I guess it's a record or something, but not one that we're proud of. We're not here to embarrass kids. We're not here to run up the score. We want our kids to play hard and get ready for the next round of the playoffs. This just sort of happened. And once it started, I didn't know what to do."

He may be right.

Smith Center forced six turnovers in their record first quarter, and ran all but one run play on offense. Their only pass? A 14-yard touchdown that made it 46-0. Fourteen different Smith Center players ran the ball, and they only passed three times all game.

Two months earlier, Mount Union College, ranked No. 1 in the nation in Division III, hung 72 points on Averett University in the first half on their way to a 75-7 win.

Purple Raider back Nate Kmic scored from 70 yards out on the first play from scrimmage and added three more in the first quarter, which ended with a 52-0 Raider advantage. Mount scored two defensive touchdowns and also scored off a blocked punt in the half.

Is it running up the score? Well, if your definition is passing with a huge lead, then yes. Mount's eighth touchdown of the game was a 39-yard pass, but it was thrown by Raider second string quarterback Kurt Rocco.

Now let's head in a different direction, one that closest resembles any Patriot evildoing.

Super Bowl XXIV. The San Francisco 49ers, led by Super Bowl MVP Joe Montana, crush John Elway and the Denver Broncos, 55-10, in what still stands as the most lopsided victory in Super Bowl history.

Up 27-3 at half, the 49ers score two touchdowns in the third quarter, both by way of Montana passes to push the score to 41-3. Of course, in this case, it doesn't matter much if the 49ers replace Montana with their second stringer, as that man happens to be future Hall of Famer Steve Young. The Niners scored two more times in the fourth, both on rushing plays.

But all of these pale in comparison to the ultimate example of running up the score.

On October 7, 1916, Georgia Tech defeated Cumberland University 222-0. (No, that's not a typo.)

Belichick's got nothing on John Heisman.
Belichick's got nothing on John Heisman.

Aside from the score itself, what makes this unique under this realm is the fact that Georgia Tech Head Coach John Heisman (yes, of that fame) actually encouraged his team to continue the massacre even after the Yellow Jackets had built a 126-0 at halftime.

"You're doing all right, team," Heisman said during his halftime speech. "We're ahead. But you just can't tell what those Cumberland players have up their sleeves. They may spring a surprise. Be alert, men! Hit 'em clean, but hit 'em. hard!"

Those tricky 127-point touchdowns...

But the real kicker was that Heisman was sending two separate teams onto the field during the game, swapping one for the other at the end of each quarter. The players were told that the team that scored the most points would win a steak dinner compliments of Heisman himself.

After the game, Heisman decided to take the entire team out, and Cumberland got their cut of $500 for the guarantee game.

So, what lessons can be learned from not only our brief history lesson, but also from the 2007 New England Patriots?

1. It doesn't matter if you run up the score if you, at the very least, pretend like it was unintentional.
2. Rushing touchdowns in the third and fourth quarters don't count.
3. Likewise if your second string quarterback throws a touchdown pass.
4. Look, you can't please everyone. You know you're better, so have fun doing it. Who knows, you may even have a prestigious trophy named after you someday.


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
720 days ago
Score 3+-
Excellent and interesting examples of running up the score. The fact that Smith Center outscored opponents 640-0 made me laugh because it's just so ridiculous.

Connecticut high school football attempted to curb running up the score by implementing a bizarre rule. Any team winning at half-time by 50 or more points would have their head coach suspended for the next game. The rule was aimed at then New Britain head coach Jack Cochran, notorious for keeping starters in late and destroying his opposition.

In a game that New Britain led 51-0 near half-time, he ran an interesting play. His RB got a hand off and immediately turned 180 degrees, running toward his own end zone, giving the opposing team a safety to end the half, making the score 51-2, and saving the coach from suspension. The other team's head coach was so embarrassed that he and his team refused to play the 2nd half.

If one looks closely at this Bills/Pats game, one can see that the Patriots were not running up the score. The second half saw a great many carries by Heath Evans and Kyle Eckel, who started the year at 4th and 5th on the runningback depth chart, respectively. Then there was a 4th and inches situation near the 30 yard line. In a close game, Belichick will go for it 99% of the time, but instead opted to punt. Had the Patriots been trying their hardest to put up meaningless points, they would have scored 80 points or more. Buffalo's defense simply had no answer for anything the Pats did on offense.
Permalink | Reply
CoreyisarealboyMajor Leaguer
720 days ago
Score 3+-
In Kansas high school football there is actually a rule that states if a team is leading by more than 40 points I believe it is, the clock will continuously run without stoppage. I've actually witnessed a few of these blowout games. A few years ago, my college's football team beat another team 75-7 and in that game they racked up 738 yards of total offense, but 594 of it was rushing, and all 11 touchdowns were on the ground (one shy of a Division III record). If I remember correctly, the second leading rusher in the game was the third string running back, who happened to bust off two touchdown runs of over 40 yards. Sometimes teams just can't stop the easy plays.
Permalink
MetsJetsDevilsDraft Pick
720 days ago
Score 0+-
The facts don't support your argument. After building a 35-7 halftime lead, the Patriots came out and had a 12 play drive. They ran the ball 5 times and passed the ball 7, including for a TD. From the Buffalo 9 they passed the ball 3 straight times, including on 4th down where they scored the TD. With a 28 point lead not only did they pass the ball, they went for it on 4th down and passed the ball again.

Then, with a 35 point lead and tom brady still in the game, they had a 10 play drive where they ran the ball 5 times, passed 4 times, and dropped back to pass another in which Brady scrambled.

I am not engaging in a debate about whether it is right or wrong to run up the score. I am merely pointing out that your assertion that they did not run up the score because they had Eckel in the game, yet were still passing on 4th down with a 28 point lead and then again with a 35 point lead, was false.
Permalink
ASwaffAll-American
720 days ago
Score 0+-
Not only that, but it wasn't with their second-string QB, as in one of the examples that was cited. They still had their starter in when the game was wrapped up, stamped and mailed home.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
720 days ago
Score -3+-
MJD, if they wanted to run up the score, they would have thrown downfield to Moss or Welker or Stallworth or Watson or Gaffney instead of handing the ball off to former Navy Midshipman Kyle Eckel. They wouldn't have 10 or 12 play drives, they would be 5 or 6 play drives. And going for it on 4th down inside the 10 yard line I don't really see as running up the score. Kicking a field goal there is more of an insult to an opposing team. Ask any coach.
Permalink
ASwaffAll-American
720 days ago
Score -1+-
I don't see that how they did it such a huge difference. Not to mention the fact that they WERE still throwing long passes with a 45 point lead in the fourth quarter. How about a 35 yard pass to Randy Moss? Does that not count? Go back and look. And the second fourth down conversion they attempted was 4th and 2 from the Washington 37. Would it have been an insult to pooch punt or try a long field goal in THAT situation?


Give it up, Raw - you don't have a leg to stand on. Your boys ran it up, plain, nasty and simple.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
720 days ago
Score 0+-
http://image..._MSlAxTrriTw
Permalink
MetsJetsDevilsDraft Pick
720 days ago
Score -1+-
I don't think there is much of an argument. The ultimate question is whether the Patriots were trying to score or not. I can understand your point if they just kept handing the ball off and the Bills were unable to stop them. A team not trying to run up the score would hand the ball off. Period. However, a team trying to run up the score would come out and throw the ball more than they ran the ball. A team trying to run up the score would throw the ball three straight times when they had 2 and 7 inside Buffalo's 10. The Patriots were running up the score. its not like this is a debate. They have done it every single game. It is intentional.
Permalink
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
720 days ago
Score 0+-
Correct me if I am wrong but wasn't the last Patriots TD against the Bills courtesy of an interception returned for a touchdown?
Permalink
MetsJetsDevilsDraft Pick
720 days ago
Score 0+-
Yes it was. Not sure what your point is. It doesn't change the fact that New England was still throwing the ball with a 4 touchdown and later more than a 4 touchdow lead.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
720 days ago
Score 0+-
TB, he should have stopped running at the 1 yard line, gotten tackled, then the Patriots should have kneeled the ball 3 times and kicked a meaningless field goal.
Permalink
ASwaffAll-American
720 days ago
Score 1+-
I like Raw putting up the crybaby, and then giving minuses to everyone just for disagreeing. You've done nothing to dispute our points, just come with attacks. That's weak.
Permalink
ASwaffAll-American
720 days ago
Score 1+-
Raw, I proved you wrong. Absolutely wrong. Do you have nothing to say for yourself at all?
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
720 days ago
Score 1+-
I think you're a baby if you're whining about the Patriots scoring a lot of points. If they were trying onside kicks and going for 2 point conversions, then I'd understand your beef. But you clowns are still bitching about a team going for it on 4th and short when the opposing team had done NOTHING to stop them. Grow up, it's the fucking NFL.

Do you guys remember who Randy Moss is? He's the guy that is known to give up on plays if he's not involved. So why not get him involved in the offense? Why not keep Welker and Stallworth in the game and get them some reps? There may be a game down the road that will require the Patriots to play hard for all 4 quarters (like the Indy game) so if everyone is used to playing only 3 quarters they'll be rusty and worn out by the 4th.

And you realize that Kyle Eckel went to Navy and spent the last two years IN the Navy, right? He's hardly a star, and he got 10 carriers. We pulled Maroney, we had Jackson returning kicks, Faulk returning punts, and we punted on a 4th and inches play. We could have put 80 points on the board with ease and didn't. But you continue to bitch. It's pathetic.
Permalink
ASwaffAll-American
720 days ago
Score 0+-
Again, this wasn't about scoring a lot of points. That happens. It's about going for unnecessary fourth down conversions, keeping in starters for too long (it was ONE game - I don't think that'll make players forget how to play four quarters) and passing with a HUGE lead in the fourth quarter. And yes, despite your assertion, they WERE making long passes. I already showed that. And they were passing to their stars. Look at the play-by-play. And I don't know what game you're talking about, but in the Washington game that I assumed was the one in dispute, Eckel got FOUR carries, not ten. Evans got five. They combined for NINE carries, which is just one more than the number of passing plays the Patriots ran in the fourth quarter. Here, do your homework: http://score...Id=271028017
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
720 days ago
Score 0+-
I was talking about the Buffalo game. And in the Washington game, Matt Cassel played pretty much the entire 4th quarter.
Permalink
ASwaffAll-American
719 days ago
Score 0+-
What do you qualify as "pretty much the entire fourth quarter"? True, Tom Brady only played one drive in the fourth (completing the drive he started in the third). However, Brady was in for 11 plays consuming 5:41 in the fourth. Cassell and Gutierrez were in for 10 plays and 4:53 in the fourth (including 1 play and 22 seconds for the game-ending kneel). So, Brady was in for more plays and more time. I have a hard time saying Cassell played pretty much the entire fourth quarter.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
719 days ago
Score 0+-
What is it you want the Patriots to do? Pull Brady in the middle of the drive because it's the 4th quarter? Kneel the ball 4 straight times every drive?
Permalink
ASwaffAll-American
719 days ago
Score -1+-
I never said anything of the sort. I'm merely pointing out that you're wrong when you say that Cassell played almost all of the fourth quarter. That wasn't true. You can make your case that they weren't running up the score, but you don't get to make up facts. Cassell did not play almost all of the fourth quarter. I don't understand how you can say the Patriots weren't running up the score when they were passing the ball with a 6 touchdown lead, playing the starters well into the fourth quarter, and going for it on fourth downs. Are you listening to your justifications for this? They didn't go for two-points conversions. Duh. Who does that?

They didn't score 80. I can't imagine that you're possibly serious when you say that a team held back just because they didn't get up to 80. That's just absurd.

Their drives were 12 plays instead of 5. What difference does that make when you're already doing the things I listed above?

You can argue that it's not wrong to do what they did. I can live with that. But I don't know how you can say the team wasn't running up the score. Everyone in the sporting world that doesn't cheer for New England knew what they were doing. Take off your homer glasses for a minute and come to grips with reality.
Permalink
Davis21wylieMVP
720 days ago
Score 3+-
Our win over Cumberland was a classic revenge game. The year before, Cumberland's baseball team brought in professionals -- ringers -- to dominate the Jackets (also coached by John Heisman), and Coach was none too pleased about it. So even though CU didn't even have a football team anymore, Heisman insisted that they play us in football, lest they incur a $3,000 fine (which was a lot in 1916). They were using a scrub team of 14 players, many of whom simply played for their fraternity's team in pickup games, but Heisman was bent on revenge and the rest is history.
Permalink | Reply
CoreyisarealboyMajor Leaguer
720 days ago
Score 4+-
Right, the baseball score was 22-0 right?
Permalink
Davis21wylieMVP
720 days ago
Score 4+-
Yeah, and I'm not sure if it was a coincidence or not that the football score was 222-0.
Permalink
FrugolfVarsity Captain
720 days ago
Score 3+-
I'm a Giants fan so this comes from a non partisan . This is Pro football, not high school, college, or even pee wee.The Giants have to play the Pats their last game. If the Pats win by 50 I say shame on the Giants.The Pats going for it on 4th down when they have a big lead tells me they are giving the other team a chance to stop them from scoring any points.Man-up and stop them or shut up and take your beating like professionals.
Permalink | Reply
XinophDraft Pick
720 days ago
Score 1+-
Exactly. People are spending so much time whining about Belichick and the Pats that they miss wondering how their team in god's name allowed them to score so much. What happened to the rest of the NFL's defenses? Do they all just want me to win my fantasy league this year? I mean, that's fine with me, but I'd rather see some close games, thank you very much.
Permalink
Niteowl049AAA-er
720 days ago
Score 1+-
Very informative article...well done. One of these days a team is going to be ahead 75-0 and stop the clock so they can try a Hail Mary pass from their own 49 yard line so they can win 82-0 or be ahead by that same margin and try an onside kick so they can recover the ball and have a chance to add to their lead.
Permalink | Reply
XinophDraft Pick
720 days ago
Score 1+-
What about the Carlisle Indian School, led at the turn of the century by Jim Thorpe and Pop Warner? On Sept. 30, 1899, they beat Susquehanna 56-0. In 1911 They outscored their opponents 298 to 49 (a margin of 249 points), going 11-1 in 12 games. The Patriots this year are 11-0 and have outscored their opponents 411-157, a margin of 254 points - barely more than the '11 Indians, arguably one of the greatest teams in college football history.

Has anyone ever accused the great Pop Warner, one of the fathers of modern football, of running up the score? Even though he was playing a squad of Native Americans against largely all-white teams, that accusation was rarely, if ever, launched. Instead, even in turn-of-the-century, rascist America, even the losing team's fans revelled in Carlisle's athletic prowess.

Whatever this phenomenon is, it's been going on for almost as long as modern football has existed. It's not unique to the '07 Patriots, and it hasn't been considered poor sportsmanship in the past. I'm making no judgement on the people who are making that claim - in fact, I don't much care what non-Pats fans think about the team. But the fact is that this has been happening for a long time in football at all levels, and it hasn't been controversial before.
Permalink | Reply
XinophDraft Pick
720 days ago
Score 1+-
The season stats were fore 1911, BTW, not 1899, sorry if that was confusing. :)
Permalink
MetsJetsDevilsDraft Pick
720 days ago
Score 1+-
The Patriots are 10-0, not 11-0.
Permalink
XinophDraft Pick
720 days ago
Score 0+-
So right. Darn typo, all those 1's and 0's messing me up :)
Permalink
BMurriettaSoccer Kid
720 days ago
Score 1+-
hahaha number 1 is so true.
Permalink | Reply
PSU ROCKSVarsity Captain
720 days ago
Score 0+-
Maybe the Eagles will stop them
Permalink | Reply
Oh No RomoDraft Pick
720 days ago
Score -2+-
Patriots (Suck) This user thinks that the Patriots (Suck) and doesn't care what any Boston fans think about it.
Permalink | Reply
Oh No RomoDraft Pick
720 days ago
Score 0+-
My opinion stays the same.
Permalink
JamelAll-American
720 days ago
Score -1+-
The Pats do suck- and Tom Brady is overrated- you know what I'm gonna write a quick article sayin this
Permalink
ASwaffAll-American
720 days ago
Score 0+-
I don't think the Patriots suck or that Brady is overrated. Clearly he's a great player. I'm just tired of obnoxious New England sports fans.
Permalink
False ProphetAll-Star
720 days ago
Score 2+-
It's not running up the score when they can score on their first 7 posessions. That just means your defense sucks
Permalink | Reply
JamelAll-American
720 days ago
Score 0+-
I hate to agree with FP here but that's true- that other game they ran up the score but this game they really didn't
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #1
712 days ago
Score 0+-
222-0

The Story of The Game of the Century by G. Frank Burns, Cumberland University Historian

The world immediately recognizes three sets of figures: 2001, December 7, and 222 to 0. The first is a movie, the second is a day that lives in infamy, and the third is indissolubly connected with Cumberland football, a veritable landmark of American sports. On October 7, 1916, Georgia Tech played Cumberland in Atlanta. Tech won 222 to 0, the worst walloping in the history of American college football. There was a worse defeat in prep school records but the 227 to 0 win by Dickinson over Haverford is suspect.

From the beginning of football at Cumberland in 1894, an ambitious schedule had each season included Southern football powers: Sewanee, Vanderbilt, the University of Mississippi, Mississippi A. & M. (now Mississippi State), Alabama, Tulane, South Carolina, Louisiana State, Tennessee, and Georgia Tech. In 1902 Cumberland's 16 to 5 win over A. & M. attracted attention. In 1903 there was the 6-0 victory over Vanderbilt, the five-day road trip that on November 14, 16, and 18 furnished consecutive victories over Tulane, Louisiana State, and Alabama, and the post-season game with Clemson, arranged by Coach John Heisman for the championship of the South, which ended with the score 11 to 11. Cumberland was proclaimed the Southern champion.

Incidentally, John Heisman's Clemson team beat Georgia Tech 73 to 0 in 1903; the next season Heisman was coaching at Georgia Tech.

The sport was dropped at Cumberland in 1906, resumed in 1912, dropped in 1915, and resumed briefly in 1916 when the memorable 222-0 game with Georgia Tech was played in Atlanta.

There is no such thing as a true account of this game. There is a contemporary play-by-play record, without color, in the files of an Atlanta newspaper. But no matter who tells the story, the temptation to embroider is irresistible.

Errors abound. It is said that Cumberland's regular football players had left that fall to "go into the trenches." Obviously the U.S. had not entered World War I in October 1916. There were enough football players on campus even to have a scrub team which played three games. George Allen, Cumberland student manager who led the troops to Atlanta, in his book says the team that played Tech also played "four or five games." There is a newspaper account of the 100 to 0 loss to Sewanee; also contemporary newspaper reports of a game at Bowling Green - score not given, but it may have been 0-0. Cumberland also played either a town team from Hartsville or the Nashville Athletic Club. The newspaper article says: "There are two other games scheduled to be played in Lebanon."

Were there ringers? It has been said that Allen "borrowed" some Vanderbilt players. This is not true, although he may have tried. The manager did recruit some of his Kappa Sigma brothers to go, and apparently one reporter for The Nashville Tennessean used a phony name and made the trip. However, the names of most of those listed are found in the university register. Robert Engler may have been the last survivor. A student in the College of Arts & Sciences, he became a nationally syndicated writer and attended college reunions regularly, receiving the Award of the Phoenix in 1976.

The players did not have to borrow uniforms from Castle Heights, as has been said; a photo of Gentry Dugat, made just before the Atlanta trip, shows him wearing the same kind of uniform Cumberland used in 1913-15. Dugat was the only Cumberland player to stay in the entire game. He later helped organize a 40-year reunion of the players of both teams in Atlanta.

Allen did not receive the nickname "Fullback" after this game. In the yearbook of 1915, he is called by this name. Another error is often repeated: Cumberland's longest gain was NOT a two-yard loss; there was one forward pass completed for a ten-yard gain. Unfortunately it was fourth and 22 at the time. The truth is bad enough. Neither team made a first down. Cumberland couldn't, and Tech scored every time it got the ball.

Quarterbacks Morris Gouger and Leon McDonald completed two passes out of eleven for fourteen yards. But Cumberland's total net yardage was minus 28. Except for touchdown runs, every play in the game was run by the Cumberland team.

The second half was cut short, by fifteen minutes.

One story that is true concerns a Cumberland fumble late in the game. It rolled toward B. F. "Bird' Paty, later a prominent attorney. The fumbler shouted, "Pick it up!" Paty replied, "Pick it up yourself, you dropped it."

How did it happen?

John Burns, student manager for 1915-16, wrote letters in the winter of 1916, making out a schedule for the coming season. At that time student managers were responsible for the correspondence to schedule athletic contests. He lacked one course to graduate in June 1916, but since he got a job he didn't return to school. (He finally took the course in 1923, graduated and became a teacher and basketball coach). President Samuel A. Coile resigned in the spring of 1916. Dr. Homer Hill, acting president, and the board of trustees trimming the budget decided to eliminate football.

Allen, student manager of the baseball team, was elected football manager in September, was told to write schools with contracts and cancel. He did so, but overlooked Georgia Tech, which insisted on performance of the contract, or a cash forfeiture. There was a guarantee and Allen offered to take the team if he could get half of that sum. (It is believed that the story that this was an "informal" team was a device to justify cancellation of the schedule without penalty.)

In a way the game was revenge: the Cumberland baseball team had beaten Georgia Tech 22 to 0 in the spring of 1915. That must have smarted.

A book about the game, You Dropped It, You Pick It Up by Marcel and Jim Paul, contains exactly 222 pages.

Cumberland resumed football in the fall of 1919.

SOURCES CONSULTED

Allen, George. Presidents Who Have Known Me. New York, 1950.

Armstrong, 0. K. "The Funniest Football Game Ever Played" in Readers Digest, October 1955, 53-57

Astor, Gerald, "Football's Glorious Slaughter" in Yesterday in Sport, Charles Osborne, editor. A Sports Illustrated Book. New York, 1968.

Baker, Dr. L. H. Football: Facts and Figures. New York, 1945. (This book, an authoritative source, mentions the Cumberland-Georgia Tech game and score in connection with Jim Preas, whose 18 goals after touchdown in the first half are an all-time record.)

Paul, Jim (and Marcel). You Dropped It, You Pick It Up! Baton Rouge, La., 1983.

The Phoenix, 1915,1916.
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/A_Lesson_in_Running_Up_the_Score"

This page was last modified 13:41, 20 November 2007. Content is available under the GFDL.

Categories: Opinions | Opinions by User Coreyisarealboy | November 20, 2007 | November 2007 | NFL Opinions | New England Patriots Opinions | Bill Belichick Opinions | College Football Opinions

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise