armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

A.L. Predictions, 2006

10
Vote

by user Xinoph

With Spring Training beginning, and baseball fans eagerly anticipating the daily box scores with their coffee and donuts, it's a good time to make some AL guesses. Mostly consistent with last year - but new faces begin to emerge...


East

  • Boston Red Sox - While the BoSox made some wonderful offseason additions, watching this young, untested team come together in the battle for first may be a trial for manager Terry Francona and indeed all of New England. Still, the Sox seem well-positioned to improve on last year and perhaps finally beat out NYY for the top spot in the division.
  • New York Yankees - Haven't improved much over last year. Does Johnny Damon really count as an improvement? Can their injury-riddled pitching staff hold it together? If you answered "No", they'll be fighting for second. If you answered "Yes", and the BoSox fall apart, they'll be gunning for the division title...again...
  • Toronto Blue Jays - The most improved team in the division was much better last year; look for that trend to continue. If the Yankees falter like last year, they won't be battling Boston for first place, but Toronto for second.
  • Baltimore Orioles - Certainly haven't improved; if anything they've slid down from 2005. While they should still managed to finish ahead of the D-Rays, they won't hold first for more than a single day this year.
  • Tampa Bay Devil Rays - They finally have decent ownership, but there's not much they can do in a single year. Look for them to finish with an improved record and greater respect than last year, though.

Central

  • Cleveland Indians – After catching on fire in late 2005, the Tribe set themselves up with a good off-season for a better 2006. This could be the closest division race in baseball all year.
  • Chicago White Sox – While the ChiSox won't repeat, they'll almost certainly make it to the playoffs again - whether as the wild-card team or Division Champion may come down to one final game.
  • Minnesota Twins - Not enough improvements; the Twins have sunk from perpetually playoff-bound to middling mediocre in just a few years. How they'll rise back up is anybody's guess.
  • Detroit Tigers – Some interesting moves - but probably not enough to launch them into contention, though they might be in third instead of fourth.
  • Kansas City Royals – Their improvements might mean they're not the absolute worst team in baseball, but they sure weren't enough to rise much in their division. If they're lucky they'll fight the Tigers for fourth.

West

  • Oakland Athletics – They didn't make a lot of improvements, just more than anyone else in their division. Even making the playoffs won't be very satisfactory to Oakland fans, who will probably watch their team get bounced in the first round again.
  • Texas Rangers - Their improved pitching should move them up in a generally weak division. Injuries, however, could send them right back to the bottom.
  • Los Angeles Angels – While they made some good moves, they didn't do enough to stay a playoff team. Expect them to battle Texas for second place.
  • Seattle Mariners – With a plethora of bad, controversial, or overrated players, there won't be many bright spots for Seattle fans. The franchise is without leadership and direction, despite its logo.


Date

Fri 2/24/2006 9:41 PM <pageTools></pageTools>

Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
PeanMajor Leaguer
1227 days ago
Score -3+-
I think the Angels are very good...how can they not "do enough to become a playoff" team when they made the ALCS last year?
Permalink | Reply
XinophDraft Pick
1227 days ago
Score -2+-
You're right, should be stay a playoff team; I was thinking of another. But them getting in the ALCS last year was really a fluke, as they proved when they rolled over and died for the ChiSox, scoring only an average 2 runs a game. In comparison, the Yankees and Red Sox in the 2004 ALCS scored an average of about 3.4 and 6.4 runs a game, respectively. Chicago's 2005 ALCS average was somewhere in between at around 5. I would say that last year's Angels went much farther than they should have, and will probably fall apart this year, much like the NFL's Philadelphia Eagles after amazingly getting close to beating the Pats in SB XXXVIII.
Permalink | Reply
XinophDraft Pick
1227 days ago
Score -1+-
Yankees scored 6.4, BoSox 3.4, the other way around from what I wrote, I believe. :)
Permalink | Reply
Awrigh01All-Star
1227 days ago
Score 3+-
I tend to agree with this prediction, except I think the Angels are a little bit better than the Rangers in the AL West.
Permalink | Reply
PeanMajor Leaguer
1227 days ago
Score -2+-
Yeah Vlad was pretty bad in the playoffs, which was very surprising...they have the pitching to stay on top though..i think Ervin Santana might breakout this year
Permalink | Reply
Awrigh01All-Star
1226 days ago
Score 1+-
the worst thing about Ervin is his first name. I expect him to have a good year too.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #1
1217 days ago
Score -3+-
Please explain to me how the Orioles have "slid down" from 2005. Yes they lost their closer, but that's about it cause Sosa and Raffy were garbage. They added an arm to their rotation, brought in the best pitching coach in baseball and signed some character guys for the clubhouse. Strange analysis.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #1
1217 days ago
Score -4+-
Please explain to me how the Orioles have "slid down" from 2005. Yes they lost their closer, but that's about it cause Sosa and Raffy were garbage. They added an arm to their rotation, brought in the best pitching coach in baseball and signed some character guys for the clubhouse. Strange analysis.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #2
1216 days ago
Score -4+-
The Blue Jays are much better on paper this year than last year, but sometimes it takes a year or so to gel. They will win the World Series in 2007.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #3
1216 days ago
Score -4+-
the yanks r going to be good witth their new guys they have some young guys too like philp huges yanks = world series
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #4
1198 days ago
Score -3+-
The Red Sox will place third behind the Yankees and Bluejays
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #5
1193 days ago
Score -4+-
I think the White Sox will start 2006 as a better team than the one that started 2005. They have the BEST rotation in the game and Thome protecting Paulie Konerko and Jermaine Dye? Cleveland can vahgetaboutit!
Permalink | Reply
XinophDraft Pick
1187 days ago
Score -1+-
Anybody who really thinks the Jays are better than the Sox is probably from Toronto. Are you kidding? They spent some money, but they didn't do nearly enough to improve. The analysis on the Orioles isn't that strange - they haven't added much (Kevin Millar is not a missing piece of anyone's puzzle), and the Jays have. The O's will definitely place fourth, maybe last, if the DRays have really improved as much as it seems.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #6
1130 days ago
Score -2+-
... no changes ... no changes ... no changes ... no changes ... no changes ... no changes ... no changes ... no changes ... no changes ... no changes ... no changes ... Thanks!!! Links: <a href='http://www.areaseo.com'>pagerank main</a> : improve pagerank default - [HTTP://www.areaseo.com improve pagerank default] : [PageRank 11|http://www.areaseo.com] - [PageRank 11|HTTP://www.areaseo.com] : http://www.a...m/improvepr/ : [google rank 20] : [| pagerank 5] : "online pr16" http://www.areaseo.com : pr
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #7
1130 days ago
Score -2+-
... no changes ... no changes ... no changes ... no changes ... no changes ... no changes ... no changes ... no changes ... no changes ... no changes ... no changes ...
Permalink | Reply
XinophDraft Pick
1098 days ago
Score 0+-
Wow. How wrong was I about the Tiger?
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/A.L._Predictions%2C_2006"

This page was last modified 16:49, 3 July 2006. Content is available under the GFDL.

Categories: Opinions | MLB Opinions | American League Opinions | New York Yankees Opinions | Boston Red Sox Opinions | Toronto Blue Jays Opinions | Tampa Bay Devil Rays Opinions | Baltimore Orioles Opinions | Cleveland Indians Opinions | Chicago White Sox Opinions | Minnesota Twins Opinions | Detroit Tigers Opinions | Kansas City Royals Opinions | Oakland Athletics Opinions | Los Angeles Angels Opinions | Seattle Mariners Opinions | Texas Rangers Opinions | February 24, 2006 | Opinions by User Xinoph

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise