armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

2007 BBall's MLB Busts

18
Vote

by user Timothy Moreland (Bball3345)

BBall's 2007 MLB Preview
2007 Team of the Future: National League
2007 Team of the Future: American League
2007 BBall's MLB Breakout Players
2007 BBall's MLB Busts
2007 BBall's MLB Mock Auction
My How Time Flies: A Look Back at 1997
2007 BBall's NL West Preview
2007 BBall's AL East Preview
2007 BBall's NL East Preview
2007 BBall's AL West Preview
2007 BBall's AL Central Preview
2007 BBall's NL Central Preview

Here are the players who are going to fail to meet expectations and/or decline substantially from last season.

---------------------------
1. Jeremy Sowers
2. Gary Sheffield
3. Anibal Sanchez
4. Chuck James
5. Brian Roberts
---------------------------


Jeremy Sowers

Reasons for Optimism: In 14 starts last season, Sowers recorded a 3.57 ERA and went 7-4. Not bad for a 23-year-old. He also walked only 20 batters in 88.3 innings.

Reasons for Concern: Sowers also struck out only 35 batters in those 88.3 innings. The list of successful pitchers with that low of a strikeout rate is not very long. Sowers has become less and less dominant each level he moves too. His ERA can only go up from here.

Gary Sheffield

Reasons for Optimism: Sheffield should be healed from last season's injuries, which limited him to 39 games. He will also be playing DH, a much less demanding position than the outfield. Last season, Sheffield still managed to hit .298, one point above his career average.

Reasons for Concern: 38-year-olds tend to decline quickly, especially ones with potential lingering injuries. His line of .298/.355/.450 was the worst for Sheffield since, well, a very very long time. If healthy, Sheffield will hit well enough to justify a starting spot; however, that is a big "if." The future Hall-of-Famer's days of All-Star games and sheer dominance at the plate are over.

Anibal Sanchez

Reasons for Optimism: Sanchez was flat-out effective last season. His 2.83 ERA and 10-3 record were future-ace-potential numbers, especially for a 22-year-old.

Reasons for Concern: Sancez's batting average on balls in play(BABIP) was a miniscule .243, which points to luck being on his side. This number will trend back toward .290-.300 in 2007. Sanchez does not have major control problems, but he doesn't exactly have pinpoint control. In his future, Sanchez could be an All-Star pitcher, but 2007's regression to the mean will push his ERA over 4.00.

Chuck James

Reasons for Optimism: In 124.7 major league innings, James has a 3.68 ERA, with an 11-4 record. James has had impressive ERAs throughtout the minors, which was a quick trip for him. He went from Rookie ball to the Majors in two years.

Reasons for Concern: James' three peripheral stats were not especially strong. His HR rate was high, his control, which he has had issues with in the past, was iffy, and his strikeout rate was barely high enough. James was also helped by a low BABIP of .250. If James' pitches like he did last year, and his BABIP regresses, then we are looking at a pitcher with an ERA closer to 5.00 than 4.00.

Brian Roberts

Reasons for Optimism: In 2005, Roberts was one of the most valuable players in the league. He slugged .515, with 45 doubles and 18 HRs, and had a stellar .387 OBP. At 29-years-old, Roberts is in the prime of his career.

Reasons for Concern: In 2006, Roberts' line dropped down to a solid, but not spectacular .286/.347/.410. The question is, was the true Roberts the 2006 version or the 2005 version? The power does not seem to be real. 2005 was Roberts' only season with an Isolated Power number above average. Also, his BABIP was much higher than normal for Roberts in 2005. 2005 was a fluke, and the future looks to be a further decline, rather than a rebound to 2005. Those expecting 2007 to be a bounceback season for Roberts will be highly dissapointed.

Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
KelsdadAll-Star
1012 days ago
Score -1+-
Sheffield is not close to being a Hall of Famer
Permalink | Reply
Bball3345Draft Pick
1012 days ago
Score 1+-
I don't think a .297/.398/.525 career line and 455 HRs with several years of dominance add up to "not close to being a Hall of Famer."
Permalink
BU ICEMANJV Squad
1012 days ago
Score 0+-
As far as Sheff goes, another reason for concern: he's hitting in Comerica! Where home run hitters go to die!!!
Permalink
TartanVarsity Captain
1012 days ago
Score 1+-
Tell that to Fred McGriff when he doesn't get into the Hall
Permalink
I am a cpcpMajor Leaguer
1012 days ago
Score 1+-
Hmm.. so by declaring them busts for 2007 before the season starts, you've technically set a very low bar for them. So for them to fail to meet expectations they'll more or less need to post negative stats to be a bust....


...or something like that.
Permalink | Reply
Bball3345Draft Pick
1012 days ago
Score 1+-
something like that...
Permalink
ChristofMVP
1012 days ago
Score 0+-
How did Soriano not make this list? He got his paid day. He is done.
Permalink | Reply
KelsdadAll-Star
1012 days ago
Score 1+-
Remind me BBall, how many votes did Albert Belle receive last year? How long have Jim Rice and Dale Murphy been on the ballot? These players are all better than Sheffield, and, to my knowledge, steriod free. So there are TWO reasons why Sheffield won't get in..he's not good enough and he's a cheater.
Permalink | Reply
Bball3345Draft Pick
1012 days ago
Score 0+-
Belle did not play nearly as long as Sheffield.
Permalink
KelsdadAll-Star
1012 days ago
Score 1+-
Agreed, and his numbers are pretty similar with alot more games played, which further emphasizes his non-qualifications.
Permalink | Reply
Bball3345Draft Pick
1012 days ago
Score 0+-
I think the voters seem to place a bigger emphasis on longevity than peak performance. Also, while neither one was loved by the media, Belle has hated moreso than Sheffield. That was another factor that hurt Belle's chances.
Permalink
KelsdadAll-Star
1012 days ago
Score 0+-
Again, I agree. But we're in an age now where 455 homers just dont have the same meaning as they used too. EVERYONE hits homers now. McGriff, Frank Thomas, Jeff Bagwell, are all 400+ plus homer guys who have little chance of getting to Cooperstown. Their numbers will be taken into the context of the era they played.
Permalink | Reply
Bball3345Draft Pick
1012 days ago
Score 0+-
Frank Thomas and Jeff Bagwell are All-Time Greats and in the class of Ripken and Gwynn as far as playing careers go. It would be a crime if they did not make the Hall. I can see an argument for Sheffield not making, even though he is First-Ballot Hall-of-Famer in my book, and I can definitely see why McGriff wouldn't make it, but Thomas and Bagwell have to be Hall-of-Fame worthy.
Permalink
Bball3345Draft Pick
1012 days ago
Score 1+-
Here is Thomas' line from 1994: .353/.487/.729. THAT IS AMAZING. Thomas had a run of 6-7 years where he was the next Ted Williams. He has also had some real nice seasons lately.
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
1012 days ago
Score 1+-
Kelsdad doesn't want anyone lese in the Hall of Fame! Lock it up, throw away the key...
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
1012 days ago
Score 0+-
BBall, I wouldn't put Thomas and Bagwell in the same sentence as Gwynn or Ripken. gwynn was an amazing hitter and Ripken was the original prototype big SS
Permalink
KelsdadAll-Star
1012 days ago
Score 0+-
Oh, good one! I just don't want players voted in because some writers who never played the game feel that they have an obligation to do so. And Frank Thomas and Jeff Bagwell were good in the era in which they played (offensive) but are not close to being "All-time greats."
Permalink | Reply
Bball3345Draft Pick
1012 days ago
Score 1+-
What? Frank Thomas has a .424 career OBP! That's great no matter what era, or league, or planet you play on. Thomas and Bagwell played in an era where batting stats were inflated, but their's STILL stood out.
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
1012 days ago
Score 0+-
I agree that Bagwell doesn't "feel" like a Hall of Famer, but I strongly believe Fred McGriff IS...
Permalink
KelsdadAll-Star
1012 days ago
Score 0+-
I feel Thomas will eventually get in, although it wont be close to first ballot. The other two have no shot.
Permalink | Reply
KelsdadAll-Star
1012 days ago
Score 0+-
My main argument with Thomas is this. He's played 1095 career games at DH, and 971 at first base. Tim is right in quoting his numbers but you have to play 10 years to qualilfy for the Hall, and seven years of HOF numbers isn't enough. So the added numbers he's put up is as a result of pinch-hitting for the last 10 years, and 10 years he's pretty much sucked by the way. And if Pujols blows out his knee tomorrow and spends the next 10 years DH'ing in Seattle hitting .265 he ain't gettin' in either.
Permalink | Reply
SashaDiv-I Stud
1012 days ago
Score 0+-
Where is Russ Ortiz?!?!?!?!
Permalink | Reply
Davis21wylieMVP
1012 days ago
Score 4+-
Tim is listing players who won't meet expectations next season. Seeing as how there are no expectations for Ortiz, he doesn't really qualify for the list. Actually, no, check that -- the expectation is that Ortiz will realize how bad he sucks and just retire already. So there you go... If he doesn't retire, we can retroactively add him to the list for failing to meet our expectations.
Permalink
Bball3345Draft Pick
1012 days ago
Score 1+-
Russ Ortiz was a 20-game winner with a decent ERA not too long ago. Quite the fall these last couple seasons. Yeah, for Ortiz to fail to meet his expectations, his ERA would have to be like 15.98 over 100 innings. Then you could say, "Man, Ortiz was even worse than I thought." An ERA in the 7.00s is just the norm for Ortiz.
Permalink
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/2007_BBall%27s_MLB_Busts"

This page was last modified 22:18, 3 February 2007. Content is available under the GFDL.

Categories: Opinions | MLB Opinions | Jeremy Sowers Opinions | Gary Sheffield Opinions | Anibal Sanchez Opinions | Chuck James Opinions | Brian Roberts Opinions | February 2, 2007 | Opinions by User Bball3345

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise